Political consumerism is the intentional buying or abstention from buying specific products for political, social, or ethical purposes. We develop and test hypotheses regarding the individual sources of political consumerism in the United States. Analysis of survey data shows that similar to voting, education, political interest, and citizen duty promote political consumerism. Akin to protest behavior, political consumerism is enhanced by political distrust and general discontent. In contrast to turnout, political consumerism significantly decreases with age. Given the extraelectoral and self-initiated nature of political consumerism, citizen initiative and a proclivity for individualized forms of activism are significant sources of political consumerism.
AbramsonPaul R.AldrichJohn H.RohdeDavid W.2007. Change and continuity in the 2004 and 2006 elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2.
AlmondGabriel A.VerbaSidney. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AndersenJorgen G.TobiasenMette. 2004. Who are these political consumers anyway? In Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present, eds. MichelettiMicheleFollesdalAndreasStolleDietlind203–22. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
4.
ArnouldEric J.2007. Should consumer citizens escape the market?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science611: 96–111.
5.
BeckUlrich. 1997. The reinvention of politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
6.
BeckUlrichBeck-GernsheimElisabeth. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BennettW. Lance. 1998. The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics31: 740–61.
8.
BennettW. Lance. 2004. Branded political communication: Lifestyle politics, logo campaigners, and the rise of global citizenship. In Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present, eds. MichelettiMicheleFollesdalAndreasStolleDietlind101–26. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
9.
BennettW. LanceEntmanRobert M.2000. Mediated politics: An introduction. In Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, eds. BennettW. LanceEntmanRobert M.1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BradyHenry E.VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay Lehman. 1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review89: 271–94.
11.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
12.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1980. The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review74 (1): 78–91.
13.
CitrinJack. 1974. Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review68: 973–88.
14.
CreyerElizabeth HRossWilliam T.1997. The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics?Journal of Consumer Marketing14: 421–32.
15.
DaltonRussell J.2008. The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington DC: CQ Press.
16.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
DoaneDeborah. 2001. Taking flight: The rapid growth of ethical consumerism. London: New Economics Foundation.
18.
EmmelhainzMargaret A.AdamsRonald J.1999. The apparel industry response to “sweatshop” concerns: A review and analysis of codes of conduct. Journal of Supply Chain Management35 (3): 51–57.
19.
FriedmanEmily2009. Health care stirs up Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, customers boycott organic grocery store. ABC News Online/Money, August14, 2009. Available at http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=8322658&page=1.
20.
FriedmanMonroe1985. Consumer boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary events in historical perspective. Journal of Consumer Affairs19: 96–117.
21.
FriedmanMonroe. 1999. Consumer boycotts: Effecting change through the marketplace and the media. New York: Routledge.
22.
FriedmanMonroe. 2004. Using consumer boycotts to stimulate corporate policy changes: Marketplace, media, and moral considerations. In Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present, eds. MichelettiMicheleFollesdalAndreasDietlindStolle45–62. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
23.
GarnerRoberta. 1997. Fifty years of social movement theory: An interpretation. In Social movement theory and research: An annotated bibliographical guide, eds. GarnerRobertaTenutoJohn1–58. Pasadena, CA: Scarecrow Press.
24.
GarrettDennis E.1987. The effectiveness of marketing policy boycotts: Environmental opposition to marketing. Journal of Marketing51 (2): 46–57.
25.
GiddensAnthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
GinsbergBenjaminShefterMartin. 1990. Politics by other means: The declining importance of elections in America. New York: Basic Books.
27.
GlickmanLawrence B.2009. Buying power: A history of consumer activism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
GurrTed R.1970. Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
HetheringtonMarc J.2005. Why trust matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
HowardMarc MorjéGibsonJames L.StolleDietlind. 2005. United States Citizenship, Involvement, Democracy Survey. Washington, DC: Center for Democracy and Civil Society, Georgetown University. Available at www.icpsr.umich.edu/, the Web site of the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Study No 4607..
31.
InglehartRonald. 1971. The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review65: 991–1017.
32.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
JenkinsJ. CraigWallaceMichael. 1996. The generalized action potential of protest movements: The new class, social trends, and political exclusion explanations. Sociological Forum11: 183–207.
34.
JordanAndrewWurzelRudiger K. W.ZitoAnthony R.BrucknerLars. 2004. Consumer responsibility-taking and eco-labeling schemes in Europe. In Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present, eds. MichelettiMicheleFollesdalAndreasStolleDietlind161–80. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
35.
KamCindy D.2007. When duty calls, do citizens answer?The Journal of Politics69: 17–29.
36.
KeckMargaret E.SikkinkKathryn. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9: 137–63.
38.
KlandermansBert. 2003. Collective political action. In Oxford handbook of political psychology, eds. SearsDavid O.HuddyLeonieJervisRobert670–709. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.JacobyWilliamNorpothHelmutWeisbergHerbert F.2008. The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
LichtermanPaul. 1996. The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
LyonSarah. 2006. Evaluating fair trade consumption: Politics, defetishization and producer participation. International Journal of Consumer Studies30: 452–64.
42.
MainieriTinaBarnettElaine G.ValderoTrisha R.UnipanJohn B.OskampStuart. 1997. Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. Journal of Social Psychology137: 189–204.
43.
MasonTania. 2000. The importance of being ethical. Marketing, October27, 27.
44.
McAdamDoug. 1982. Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
MichelettiMichele. 2003. Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
MichelettiMicheleFollesdalAndreasStolleDietlind, eds. 2004. Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
47.
NelsonMichelle R.RademacherMark A.PaekHye-Jin. 2007. Downshifting consumer = upshifting citizen? An examination of a local freecycle community. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science611: 141–56.
48.
NorrisPippa. 2002. The democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
OstromMary A.2008. Prop. 8: The fight goes on. San Jose Mercury News, Article ID: 1038241.
50.
PattieCharlesSeydPatrickWhiteleyPaul. 2003. Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies51: 443–68.
51.
PruittStephan W.FriedmanMonroe. 1986. Determining the effectiveness of consumer boycotts: A stock price analysis of their impact on corporate targets. Journal of Consumer Policy9: 375–87.
52.
PruittStephan W.WeiK. C. JohnWhiteRichard E.1988. The impact of union-sponsored boycotts on the stock prices of target firms. Journal of Labor Research9: 285–89.
53.
RimmermanCraig A.2001. The new citizenship: Unconventional politics, activism, and service, 2nd ed.Boulder, CO: Westview.
54.
RockMichael T.2003. Public disclosure of the sweatshop practices of American multinational garment/shoe makers/retailers: Impacts on their stock prices. Competition & Change7: 23–38.
55.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
56.
SapiroVirginia. September2000. Economic activity as political activity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
57.
SchatzRobert T.LavineHoward. 2007. Waving the flag: National symbolism, social identity, and political engagement. Political Psychology28: 329–55.
58.
SchudsonMichael. 2007. Citizens, consumers, and the good society. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science611: 236–49.
59.
ShahDhavan V.McLeodDouglas M.KimEunkyungLeeYoung SunGotliebMelissa R.HoShirley S.BreivikHilde. 2007. Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive “lifestyle politics.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science611: 217–35.
60.
SklarKathryn K.1998. The consumers’ white label campaign of the National Consumers League, 1898–1918. In Getting and spending: European and American consumer societies in the twentieth century, eds. StrasserSusanMcGovernCharlesJudtMatthias17–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SmelserNeil. 1963. Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
62.
SmithBarbara C.1994. Food rioters and the American Revolution. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series51: 3–38.
63.
SmithN. Craig. 2001. Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest advocacy and actions: The role of consumer boycotts and socially responsible consumption in promoting corporate social responsibility. In Handbook of marketing and society, eds. BloomPaul N.GundlachGregory T.140–61. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
StolleDietlindHoogheMarcMichelettiMichele. 2005. Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review26: 245–69.
65.
StoneGregory P.1954. City shopper and urban identification: Observation on the social psychology of city life. American Journal of Sociology60: 36–45.
66.
TimponeRichard J.1998. Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review92: 145–58.
67.
VerbaSidneyNieNorman H.1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.
68.
WestbrookRobert A.BlackWilliam C.1985. A motivation-based shopper typology. Journal of Retailing61: 78–103.
69.
WollebakDagSellePer. 2003. The importance of passive membership for social capital formation. In Generating social capital, eds. HoogheMarcStolleDietlind67–88. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
