In this paper we consider how political ideology, attitudes toward historically-marginalized groups, and identification with grievance groups shape Americans’ self-reported participation in political consumerism (i.e., political boycotts and buycotts). Using data from the 2016 and 2020 American National Election Studies (ANES) surveys, we find that ideological intensity has an asymmetrical effect on boycott behavior in 2016, with strong liberals considerably more likely to engage in boycott behavior than strong conservatives. In 2020 the effect of ideological intensity shifts upward dramatically for conservatives, with both liberals and conservatives likely to engage in boycott behavior. We also find mixed results for the effects of attitudes toward and identification with historically-marginalized groups, though we do find that general political participation (and related variables) are strongly related to boycott activity. We discuss the implications of our findings, particularly as they relate to the effects of ideological intensity for liberals and conservatives.
AckermannK.GundelachB. (2020). Psychological roots of political consumerism: Personality traits and participation in boycott and buycott. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120959683
2.
AndersenJ. G.TobiasenM. (2004). Who are these political consumers anyway? Survey evidence from Denmark. In MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. Routledge Press.
BennettW. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500053270
5.
BennettW. L. (2004). Branded political communication: Lifestyle politics, logo campaigns, and the rise of global citizenship. In MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 101–126). Routledge Press.
6.
BennettW. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
7.
BennettW. L.IyengarS. J. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
CopelandL. (2014). Value change and political action: Postmaterialism, political consumerism, and political participation. American Politics Research, 42(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x13494235
10.
CopelandL.BoulianneS. (2020). Political consumerism: A meta-analysis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120905048
11.
DaltonR. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.
12.
De MoorJ. (2017). Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation. Acta Politica, 52(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2015.27
13.
EndresK.PanagopoulosC. (2017). Boycotts, buycotts and political consumerism in America. Research & Politics, 4(4), Article 205316801773863. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017738632
14.
FriedmanM. J. (2004). Using consumer boycotts to stimulate corporate policy changes: Marketplace, media, and moral considerations. In MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 45–62). Routledge Press.
15.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
16.
HoogheM. (2014). Defining political participation: How to pinpoint an elusive target?Acta Politica, 49(3), 338–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.7
17.
HoogheM.GoubinS. (2022). The democratic potential of political consumerism: The effect of visibility bias and social stratification. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120935931
18.
InglehartR. (1997a). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.
19.
InglehartR. (1997b). Modernization, postmodernization, and changing perceptions of risk. International Review of Sociology, 7(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.1997.9971250
20.
InglehartR. (2020). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 Wocieties. Princeton university press.
21.
KeckM. E.SikkinkK. (2014). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
McAdamD. (2010). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press.
24.
MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (Eds.), (2008). Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. Transaction Books.
25.
NewmanB. J.BartelsB. L. (2011). Politics at the checkout line: Explaining political consumerism in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379232
26.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In LaneC.LockhartC. (Eds.), Culture and politics: A reader (pp. 223–234). Palgrave-McMillan.
27.
SapiroV. (2000). Economic activity as political activity. Paper presented at the annual meeting: American Political Science Association.
28.
SchudsonM. J. (2007). Citizens, consumers, and the good society. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207299195
29.
ShahD. V.McLeodD. M.KimE.Sun Young LeeGotliebM. R.HoS. S.BreivikH. (2007). Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive “lifestyle politics”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206298714
30.
StolleD.HoogheM.MichelettiM. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053784
31.
StolleD.MichelettiM. (2013). Political consumerism: Global responsibility in action. Cambridge University Press.
