Despite the negative rhetoric surrounding the immigration issue, recent policy in many states has provided significant benefits to both legal and undocumented immigrants. Previous scholarship on state-level immigrant policy suggests that differences in the degree of public animosity toward this group may help to explain variation in state policy, but that work largely neglects the influence that industries that employ immigrants may have on state policy decisions. This essay develops the argument that industries that employ immigrants have a substantial impact on policy decisions in some states. It also suggests that the response of state policy makers to public pressure for more restrictive immigrant policy may be moderated by the political and economic importance of those industries. The authors test specific assertions drawn from this argument in an analysis of immigrant policy making in the American states between 2005 and 2007.
AlvarezR. MichaelButterfieldTara. 2000. The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of Proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly81:167-79.
2.
BachRobert L.1978. Mexican immigration and the American state. International Migration Review12:538-66.
3.
BaileyMichaelRomMark. 2004. A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics66:326-47.
4.
BarrilleauxC. J.MillerM. E.1988. The political economy of state Medicaid policy. American Political Science Review82:1089-1107.
5.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. The American Political Science Review84:395-415.
6.
BerryWilliamRingquistEvanFordingRichardHansonRussell. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science42:327-48.
7.
BorjasGeorge. 2001. Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BursteinPaul. 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly56:29-40.
9.
CalavitaKitty. 1996. The new politics of immigration: Balanced budget conservatism and the symbolism of Proposition 187. Social Problems43:284-305.
10.
CaldeiraG.PattersonS.1982. Bringing home the votes: Electoral outcomes in state legislative races. Political Behavior4:33-67.
11.
CardenasJose. 2007. Illegal workers on state agenda. St. Petersburg Times, December17, 1a.
12.
CitrinJackReingoldBethWaltersEvelynGreenDonald P.1990. The “official English” movement and the symbolic politics of language in the United States. Western Political Quarterly43:535-59.
13.
CohenJeffrey E.KingJames D.2004. Relative unemployment and gubernatorial popularity. Journal of Politics66:1267-82.
14.
DomhoffG. William. 1998. Who rules America? Power and politics in the year 2000. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
15.
DyeThomas. 1966. Politics, economics, and the public. Chicago: Rand McNally.
16.
EriksonRobert. 1976. The relationship between public opinion and state policy: A new look based on some forgotten evidence. American Journal of Political Science20:25-36.
17.
EriksonRobertWrightGeraldMcIverJohn. 1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FellowsMathewWolfPatrick. 2004. Funding mechanisms and policy instruments: How business campaign contributions influence congressional votes. Political Research Quarterly57:315-24.
19.
FentonJohn. 1966. People and parties in politics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Co.
20.
GarciaRuben J.1995. Critical race theory and Proposition 187: The racial politics of immigration law. Chicano-Latino Law Review17:118-54.
21.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavid. 1988. Interest group politics and economic growth in the U.S. states. American Political Science Review82:109-31.
22.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.MeierKenneth J.1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics58:332-49.
23.
HansenJohn Mark. 1991. Gaining access: Congress and the farm lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
HeroRodneyTolbertCaroline J.1996. A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S. American Journal of Political Science40:851-71.
25.
HeroRodneyPreuhsRobert. 2007. Immigration and the evolving American welfare state: Examining policies in the American states. American Journal of Political Science51:498-517.
26.
HofferbertRichard. 1966. The relationship between public policy and some structural and environmental variables. American Political Science Review60:73-82.
27.
HoodM. W.IIIMorrisIrwin L.1998. Give us your tired, your poor, . . . but make sure they have a green card: The effects of documented and undocumented migrant context on Anglo opinion toward immigration. Political Behavior20:1-15.
28.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.2001. Variability in state policy priorities: An empirical analysis. Journal of Politics63:544-68.
29.
JonesBryan D.1994. Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
KinderDonald R.MendelbergTali. 1995. Cracks in American apartheid: The political impact of prejudice among desegregated whites. Journal of Politics57:402-24.
31.
KoniskyDavid M.2007. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom?American Journal of Political Science51:853-72.
32.
LeydenKevin M.BorelliStephen A.1995. The effect of state economic conditions on gubernatorial elections: Does unified government make a difference?Political Research Quarterly48:275-90.
33.
LlanaSara Miller. 2008. New pressures force U.S. farmers south of the order. Christian Science Monitor, July15th, p.1.
34.
McClainPaula D.CarterNiambi M.DeFrancesco SotoVictoria M.LyleMonique L.GrynaviskiJeffrey D.NunnallyShayla C.ScottoThomas J.KendrickJ. AlanLackeyGerald F.CottonKendra Davenport. 2008. Racial distancing in a southern city: Latino immigrants’ views of African Americans. Journal of Politics68:571-84.
35.
NgaiMae M.2004. Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
NiceDavid. 1984. Interest groups and policymaking in the American states. Political Behavior6:183-96.
37.
NiemiRichard G.StanleyHarold W.VogelRonald J.1995. State economies and state taxes: Do voters hold governors accountable?American Journal of Political Science39:936-57.
38.
OliverJ. EricWongJanelle. 2003. Inter-group prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science47:567-82.
39.
PasselJeffrey. 2006. The size and characteristics of the unauthorized migrant population in the U.S.: Estimates based on the March 2005 Current Population Survey. Research report. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/61.pdf.
40.
PlotnickRobertWintersRichard. 1985. Party, political liberalism, and redistribution. American Politics Research18:430-58.
41.
PreuhsRobert R.2005. Descriptive representation, legislative leadership, and direct democracy: Latino influence on English only laws in the states, 1984–2002. State Politics and Policy Quarterly5:203-24.
42.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2):137-74.
43.
QuillianLincoln. 1996. Group threat and regional change in attitudes towards African Americans. American Journal of Sociology102:816-60.
44.
QuinnDennis P.ShapiroRobert Y.1991. Business political power: The case of taxation. American Political Science Review85:851-74.
45.
SaxtonAlexander. 1975. The indispensable enemy: Labor and the anti-Chinese movement in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
SchildkrautDeborah J.2001. Official English and the states’ influence on declaring English the official language in the United States. Political Research Quarterly54:445-57.
47.
SmithRichard. 1995. Interest group influence in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly20:89-139.
48.
TatalovichRaymond. 1995. Nativism reborn? The official English language movement and the American states. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
49.
TeskePaul. 1991. Interests and institutions in state regulation. American Journal of Political Science35:139-54.
50.
ThomasCliveHrebenarRonald. 2004. Interest groups in the states. In Politics and policy in the American states: A Comparative analysis, 8th ed., ed. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell, 100-28. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
51.
TichenorDaniel J.2002. Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
VoldenCraig. 2002. The politics of competitive federalism: A race to the bottom in welfare benefits?American Journal of Political Science46:352-63.
53.
WeberRonaldShafferWilliam. 1972. Public opinion and American state policymaking. Midwest Journal of Political Science16:633-99.
54.
WelchSusanSigelmanLeeBledsoeTimothyCombsMichael. 2001. Race and place: Race relations in an American city. New York: Cambridge University Press.
WongCarolyn. 2006. Lobbying for inclusion: Rights politics and the making of immigration policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
WrightGeraldEriksonRobertMcIverJohn. 1987. Public opinion and policy liberalism in the American states. American Journal of Political Science31:980-1001.
58.
WrightJohn R.1996. Interest groups & congress. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
