Does the partisanship of officeholders affect environmental outcomes? The popular perception is that Republicans are bad for the environment, but complicating factors like federalism may limit this outcome. Using a dataset that tracks toxic releases over 20 years, we examine how partisan control of executive and legislative branches at both state and federal levels affect environmental policy. Moving beyond the passage of policies or environmental program spending allows us to fully understand the impact of Republicans on the environment. In addition, we take into account structural complications that may shape the relationship between Republican control and environmental outcomes. We find that the conventional wisdom that Republicans are bad for the environment has some validity, but it is dependent on what offices Republican elected officials occupy. More specifically, Republicans significantly affect toxic chemical releases when occupying governorships and controlling Congress. Our conclusions provide further insight into understanding how partisanship affects environmental outcomes, including how partisanship composition across the federal system matters.
BacotA. HunterDawesRoy A. 1997. “State Expenditures and Policy Outcomes in Environmental Program Management.” Policy Studies Journal25 (3): 355–70.
3.
BarrilleauxCharles. 1999. “Governors, Bureaus, and State Policymaking.” State and Local Government Review31 (1): 53–59.
4.
BarrilleauxCharlesBerkmanMichael. 2003. “Do Governors Matter? Budgeting Rules and the Politics of State Policymaking.” Political Research Quarterly56 (4): 409–17.
5.
BawnKathleenCohenMartinKarolDavidMasketSethNoelHansZallerJohn. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics10 (3): 571–97.
6.
BellAndrewJonesKelvyn. 2015. “Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional Panel Data.” Political Science Research and Methods3 (1): 133–53.
7.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 327–48.
8.
BeyleThadFergusonMargaret. 2008. “Governors and the Executive Branch.” In Politics in the American States, 9th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 192–228.
9.
BowenWilliam M.WellsMichael V. 2002. “The Politics and Reality of Environmental Justice: A History and Considerations for Public Administrators and Policy Makers.” Public Administration Review62 (6): 688–98.
10.
Bromley-TrujilloRebeccaHolmanMiryaSandovalAndres. 2019. “Hot Districts, Cool Legislation: Evaluating Agenda Setting in Climate Change Bill Sponsorship in US States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly19 (3): 375–95.
11.
CarleySanya. 2011. “The Era of State Energy Policy Innovation: A Review of Policy Instruments.” Review of Policy Research28 (3): 265–94.
ChangHoward F.SigmanHilaryTraubLeah G. 2014. “Endogenous Decentralization in Federal Environmental Policies.” International Review of Law & Economics37:39–50.
14.
ClarkTom S.LinzerDrew A. 2015. “Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects?” Political Science Research and Methods3 (2): 399–408.
15.
CoffeyDaniel J.2014. “Federal Parties and Polarization.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Politics, eds. GreenJohn CliffordCoffeyDaniel J.CohenDavid B. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 137–53.
16.
CrottyPatricia McGree. 1987. “The New Federalism Game: Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy.” Publius17 (2): 53–67.
17.
DaleyDorothy M.GarandJames C. 2005. “Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989-1998.” American Politics Research33 (5): 615–44.
18.
DanielsDavid P.KrosnickJon A.TichyMichael P.TompsonTrevor. 2012. “Public Opinion on Environmental Policy in the United States.” In Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy, eds. KraftMichaelKamienieckiSheldon. New York: Oxford University Press, 461–86.
19.
DietzThomasFrankKenneth A.WhitleyCameron T.KellyJenniferKellyRachel. 2015. “Political Influences on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112 (27): 8254–59.
DometriusNelson C.2002. “Gubernatorial Approval and Administrative Influence.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (3): 251–67.
22.
DunlapRiley E.McCrightAaron M. 2008. “A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development50 (5): 26–35.
23.
FowlerLuke. 2016a. “Local Governments: The ‘Hidden Partners’ of Air Quality Management.” State and Local Government Review48 (3): 175–88.
24.
FowlerLuke. 2016b. “The States of Public Opinion on the Environment.” Environmental Politics25 (2): 315–37.
25.
FowlerLuke. 2019. “Problems, Politics, and Policy Streams in Policy Implementation.” Governance32:403–20.
26.
FoxJohn Georges Monette. 1992. “Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics.” Journal of the American Statistical Association87 (417): 178–83.
27.
FranciaPeter L.MorrisJonathan S. 2014. “The Divided Republicans?Tea Party Supporters, Establishment Republicans, and Social Networks.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Politics, eds. GreenJohn C.CoffeyDaniel J.CohenDavid B. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 175–90.
28.
GromleyWilliam T.2006. “Money and Mandates: The Politics of Intergovernmental Conflict.” Publius36 (4): 523–40.
29.
GrossmannMattDominguezCasey B. K. 2009. “Party Coalitions and Interest Group Networks.” American Politics Research37 (5): 767–800.
30.
HowellWilliam G.LewisDavid E. 2002. “Agencies by Presidential Design.” Journal of Politics64 (4): 1095–1114.
31.
HuberJohn D.ShipanCharles R.PfahlerMadelaine. 2001. “Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 330–45.
32.
JohnsonMartinBracePaulArceneauxKevin. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly86 (1): 87–108.
33.
KamienieckiSheldon. 1995. “Political Parties and Environmental Policy.” In Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence, 2nd ed., ed. LesterJames P. Durham: Duke University Press, 146–67.
34.
KimSung EunUrpelainenJohannes. 2018. “Environmental Public Opinion in the U.S. States, 1973-2012.” Environmental Politics27 (1): 89–114.
35.
KogerGregoryMasketSethNoelHans. 2010. “Cooperative Party Factions in American Politics.” American Politics Research38 (1): 33–53.
36.
KoniskyDavid M.2007. “Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom?” American Journal of Political Science51 (4): 853–72.
37.
KoniskyDavid M.MilyoJeffreyRichardsonLilliard E. 2008. “Environmental Policy Attitudes: Issues, Geographical Scale, and Political Trust.” Social Science Quarterly89:1066–85.
38.
KoniskyDavid M.WoodsNeal D. 2010. “Exporting Air Pollution? Regulatory Enforcement and Environmental Free Riding in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly63 (4): 771–82.
39.
KoniskyDavid M.WoodsNeal D. 2012. “Measuring State Environmental Policy.” Review of Policy Research29 (4): 544–69.
40.
KoniskyDavid M.WoodsNeal D. 2016. “Environmental Policy, Federalism, and the Obama Presidency.” Publius46 (3): 366–91.
41.
KoniskyDavid M.WoodsNeal D. 2018. “Environmental Federalism and the Trump Presidency: A Preliminary Assessment.” Publius48 (3): 345–71.
42.
KoskiChris. 2007. “Regulatory Choices: Analyzing State Policy Design.” Law & Policy29 (4): 407–34.
43.
LayzerJudith A.2012. Open for Business: Conservatives’ Opposition to Environmental Regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
LesterJames P.1995. “Federalism and State Environmental Policy.” In Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence, 2nd ed., ed. LesterJames P. Durham: Duke University Press, 39–60.
45.
McCrightAaron M.XiaoChenyangDunlapRiley E. 2014. “Political Polarization on Support for Government Spending on Environmental Protection in the USA, 1974-2012.” Social Science Research48:251–60.
O’TooleLaurence J.YuChilikCooleyJamesCowieGailCrowSusanDeMeoTerryHerbertStephanie. 1997. “Reducing Toxic Chemical Releases and Transfers: Explaining Outcomes for a Voluntary Program.” Policy Studies Journal25 (1): 11–26.
PotoskiMatthew. 1999. “Managing Uncertainty through Bureaucratic Design: Administrative Procedures and State Air Pollution Control Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9 (4): 623–40.
51.
PotoskiMatthew. 2001. “Clean Air Federalism: Do States Race to the Bottom?” Public Administration Review61 (3): 335–42.
52.
PotoskiMatthew. 2002. “Designing Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Administrative Procedures and Agency Choice in State Environmental Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (1): 1–23.
53.
PotoskiMatthewWoodsNeal D. 2000. “Designing State Clean Air Agencies: Administrative Procedures and Bureaucratic Autonomy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11 (2): 203–21.
54.
PrimoDavid M.JacobsmeierMatthew L.MilyoJeffrey. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (4): 446–59.
55.
RabeBarry. 2007. “Environmental Policy and the Bush Era: The Collision between the Administrative Presidency and State Experimentation.” Publius37 (3): 413–31.
56.
RabeBarry. 2008. “States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Climate Change Policy.” Review of Policy Research25 (2): 105–28.
57.
RabeBarry. 2011. “Contested Federalism and American Climate Policy.” Publius41 (3): 494–521.
58.
RuckelshausWilliam D.1985. “Environmental Protection: A Brief History of the Environmental Movement in America and the Implications Abroad.” Environmental Law15 (3): 455–69.
59.
SapatAlka. 2004. “Devolution and Innovation: The Adoption of State Environmental Policy Innovations by Administrative Agencies.” Public Administration Review64 (2): 141–51.
60.
ScheberleDenise. 2004. Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
61.
ScheberleDenise. 2005. “The Evolving Matrix of Environmental Federalism and Intergovernmental Relationships.” Publius35 (1): 69–86.
62.
ScicchitanoMichael J.HedgeDavid M. 1993. “From Coercion to Partnership in Federal Partial Preemption: SMCRA, RCRA, and OSH Act.” Publius23 (4): 107–21.
63.
ShipanCharles R.LowryWilliam R. 2001. “Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly54 (2): 245–63.
64.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–51.
65.
SkocpolThedaHertel-FernandezAlexander. 2016. “The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism.” Perspective on Politics14 (3): 681–99.
66.
TravisRickMorrisJohn C.MorrisElizabeth D. 2004. “State Implementation of Federal Environmental Policy: Leveraging in the State Clean Water Revolving Fund.” Policy Studies Journal32 (3): 461–80.
67.
TurnerJames M.IsenbergAndrew C. 2018. The Republican Reversal: Conservatives and the Environment from Nixon to Trump. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
VandeweerdtClaraKerremansBartCohnAvery. 2016. “Climate Voting in the US Congress: The Power of Public Concern.” Environmental Politics25 (2): 268–88.
76.
WoodB. DanBohteJohn. 2004. “Political Transaction Costs and the Politics of Administrative Design.” Journal of Politics66 (1): 176–202.
77.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review85 (3): 801–28.
78.
WoodsNeal D.2006a. “Interstate Competition and Environmental Regulation: A Test of the Race-to-the-Bottom Thesis.” Social Science Quarterly87 (1): 174–89.
79.
WoodsNeal D.2006b. “Primacy Implementation of Environmental Policy in the U.S. States.” Publius36 (2): 259–76.
80.
WoodsNeal D.2008. “The Policy Consequences of Political Corruption: Evidence from State Environmental Programs.” Social Science Quarterly89 (1): 258–71.
81.
WoodsNeal D.BaranowskiMichael. 2007. “Governors and the Bureaucracy: Executive Resources as Sources of Administrative Influence.” International Journal of Public Administration30 (11): 1219–30.
82.
WoodsNeal D.KoniskyDavid M.BowmanAnn O’M. 2009. “You Get What You Pay For: Environmental Policy and Public Health.” Publius39 (1): 95–116.
83.
WoodsNeal D.PotoskiMatthew. 2010. “Environmental Federalism Revisited: Second-Order Devolution in Air Quality Regulation.” Review of Policy Research27 (6): 721–39.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
