We examine the role that local parties play in responding to and equipping local volunteers to work during campaign seasons. We use a field experiment during the 2020 U.S. general election to investigate whether local parties are more likely to respond to certain types of volunteers and to examine what factors are associated with local parties’ responsiveness. We find that both Democratic and Republican local parties in competitive counties are more likely to respond to volunteers. Moreover, we find that both parties are more likely to respond to white volunteers and Democratic parties are more likely to respond to women. These differential response rates may be contributing to the increased demographic sorting between the parties.
AldrichJohn. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. University of Chicago Press.
2.
BatesonRegina.2020. “Strategic Discrimination.” Perspective on Politics18 (4): 1068–1087.
3.
BawnKathleenCohenMartinMasketSethNoelHansZallerJohn. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics10 (3): 571–97.
4.
BeckPaul A.HeidemannErik D.. 2014. "Changing Strategies in Grassroots Canvassing: 1956–2012." Party Politics20 (2): 261–274.
5.
BeckPaul A.GuntherRichardNisbetErik. 2018. “What Happened to the Ground Game in 2016?” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, edited by GreenJohn C.CoffeyDaniel J.CohenDavid B., 263–277. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
6.
BlumbergMelanie J.BinningWilliam C.LewisSarah K.GreenJohn C.. 2011. “Party on the Periphery: The 2008 Presidential Campaign in Mahoning County.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, 6th Ed, edited by GreenJohn C.CoffeyDaniel J., 101–114. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
7.
BroockmanDavid E. 2013. “Black Politicians are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 521–536.
8.
BrooksJohnChatfieldSarah. 2020. “Mind the Gap: Examining the Role of Gender in Campaign Staffing and Compensation.” Electoral Studies67: 1–10.
ButlerDaniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ButlerDaniel M.BroockmanDavid E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 463–77.
12.
ButlerDaniel M.PreeceJessica Robinson. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly69 (4): 842–851.
13.
ChewningTaylor KGreenJonHassellHans J.G.MilesMatthew R.. 2021. “Campaign Voters as Faithful and Representative Agents.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Conference.
14.
ClarkAlistair. 2004. “The Continued Relevance of Local Parties in Representative Democracies.” Politics24 (1): 35–45.
15.
ClarkJohn A.LockerbieBradWielhouwerPeter W.. 1998. “Campaign Activities.” In Party Organization and Activism in the American South, edited by SteedRobert P.ClarkJohn A.BowmanLewisHadleyCharles D., 119–133. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
16.
CotterCBibbyJohn F.GibsonJames L.HuckshornRobert J.. 1984. Party organizations in American politics. University of Pittsburgh Press.
17.
CostaMia. 2017. “How Responsive Are Political Elites? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on Public Officials.” Journal of Experimental Political Science4: 241–54.
18.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2011. “The Party’s Still Going: Local Party Strength and Activity in 2008.” In State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, 6th Ed, edited by GreenJohn C.CoffeyDaniel J., 115–134. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
19.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender9: 390–413.
DohertyDavidDowlingConor M.MillerMichael G.. 2019. “Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Journal of Politics81 (4): 1282–1297.
22.
DohertyDavidDowlingConor M.MillerMichael G.. 2021. “The Conditional Effect of Local Party Organization Activity on Federal Election Outcomes.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties31 (3): 368–387.
23.
DownsAnthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
EinsteinKatherine LevineGlickDavid. 2016. “Does Race Affect Access to Government Services?: An Experiment Exploring Street-Level Bureaucrats and Access to Public Housing.” American Journal of Political Science61 (1): 100–116.
25.
EnosRyan D.HershEitan D.. 2015. “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem.” American Political Science Review109 (2): 252–78.
26.
FeigertFrank B.ToddJohn R.. 1998. “Party Maintenance Activities.” In Party Organization and Activism in the American South, edited by SteedRobert P.ClarkJohn A.BowmanLewisHadleyCharles D., 105–118. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
27.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.. 2010. “If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics72 (2): 310–326.
28.
FranklinDanielRicheySeanYonkRyan M.. 2013. "Battlegrounds and Budgets: State-Level Evidence of Budget Manipulation in Competitive Presidential Election States." State and Local Government Review45 (2): 108–115.
29.
GaddisS. Michael. 2018. “An Introduction to Audit Studies in the Social Sciences.” In Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance, edited by GaddisS. M.. Springer.
30.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review94 (3): 653–663.
31.
GibsonJames L.FrendreisJohn P.VertzLaura L.. 1989. “Party Dynamics in the 1980s: Change in County Party Organizational Strength, 1980-1984.” American Journal of Political Science33 (1): 67–90.
32.
GillionDaniel Q.LaddJonathan. MMeredithMarc. 2020. “Party Polarization, Ideological Sorting and the Emergence of the US Partisan Gender Gap.” British Journal of Political Science50 (4): 1217–1243.
33.
GreenDonald P.GerberAlanNickersonDavid W.. 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results From Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” Journal of Politics65 (4): 1083–1096.
HassellHans J. G. 2020. “It’s Who’s on the Inside That Counts: Campaign Practitioner Personality and Campaign Electoral Integrity.” Political Behavior42 (4): 1119–1142.
38.
HayesThomas J.BishinBenjamin G.. Do Elected Officials Serve the Poor on Health Care? Evidence From a Field Experiment on Members of Congress and State Legislators. The Social Sciences Journal2020; 1–17.
39.
HersheyMarjorie R. 2017. Party Politics in America: 17th Edition. Routledge.
40.
HulbaryWilliam E.BowmanLewis. 1998. “Recruiting Activists.” In Party Organization and Activism in the American South, edited by SteedRobert P.ClarkJohn A.BowmanLewisHadleyCharles D., 13–31. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
LandgraveMichelangelo. 2020. “Can We Reduce Deception in Elite Field Experiments? Evidence from a Field Experiment with State Legislative Offices.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly20: 1–19.
45.
LandgraveMichelangeloWellerNicholas. 2020. “Do More Professionalized Legislatures Discriminate Less? The Role of Staffers in Constituency Service.” American Politics Research48 (5): 571–578.
46.
LandgraveMichelangeloWellerNicholas. 2022. “Do Name-Based Treatments Violate Information Equivalence? Evidence from a Correspondence Audit Experiment.” Political Analysis30 (1): 142–148.
MaycekoMelissa. 2021. “Political Campaigns, Voter Outreach, and American Democracy: Socializing Effective Participation and Citizen Agency in the United States.” American Anthropologist123 (3): 539–551.
RoscoeDouglas D.JenkinsShannon. 2016. Local Party Organizations in the Twenty-First Century. SUNY Press.
54.
RoscoeDouglas D.JenkinsShannon. 2021. "Amateur Hour: The dominance of Purposive Benefits Among Local Political Party Chairs." Social Science Quarterly102 (4): 1602–1614.
ShawDaron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
SinclairBetsyMcConnellMargaretMichelsonMelissa R.. 2013. “Local Canvassing: The Efficacy of Grassroots Voter Mobilization.” Political Communications30 (1): 42–57.
58.
Social Security Administration. 2020. “National Data on the Relative Frequency of Given Names in the Population of U.S. Births Where the Individual Has a Social Security Number.” https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html
59.
SoraufFrank J. 1960. “The Silent Revolution in Patronage.” Public Administration Review20 (1): 28–34. DOI: 10.2307/974064
60.
TzioumisKonstantinos. 2018. “Demographic Aspects of First Names.” Scientific Data5: 180025.
ZingherJoshua N. 2018. “Polarization, Demographic Change, and White Flight from the Democratic Party.” Journal of Politics80 (3): 860–872.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
