Utilizing quantitative genetic models, the authors examine the sources of party identification and the intensity of that identification. The results indicate genes exert little, if any, influence on party identification, directly or indirectly through covariates. However, we find that genes appear to play a pivotal role in shaping the strength of an individual’s party identification. Together with recent examinations of political attitudes and vote choice, these findings begin to provide a more complete picture of the source of partisanship and the complex nature of the political phenotype.
Achen, Christopher H.2002. Parental socialization and rational party identification . Political Behavior24 (2): 151-70.
2.
Alford, John, Carolyn Funk, and John Hibbing.2005. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review99 (2): 153-67.
3.
Alford, John, Carolyn Funk, and John Hibbing.2008. "Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes." Perspectives on Politics6(2): 321-326.
4.
Allen, Elizabeth, Jon Beckwith, Barbara Beckwith, Steven Chorover, David Culver, and Margaret Duncan .1975. Against "sociobiology."The New York Review of Books22 (18).
5.
Beckwith, Jon.1993. A historical view of social responsibility in genetics . BioScience43:327-33.
6.
Bouchard, Thomas, Jr. , and Matt McGue .2003. Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology54 (1): 4-45.
7.
Caprara, G.V., and Cervone, D.2000. Personality: Determinants, dynamics and potentials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes .1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.
9.
Charney, Evan.2008. Genes and ideologies. Perspectives on Politics6 (2): 292-319.
10.
Darwin, Charles.1872. The expression of emotions in man and animals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Depue, Richard A., and Paul F. Collins .1999. Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion . Behavioral Brain Science22 (3): 491-517.
12.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius.1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher35:125-29.
13.
Eaves, Lindon J.1977. Inferring the causes of human variation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society140 (3): 324-55.
14.
Eaves, Lindon J.1982. The utility of twins. In Genetic basis of the epilepsies, ed. V. E. Anderson, W. A. Hauser, J. K. Penry, and C. F. Sing, 249-76. New York: Raven.
15.
Eaves, Lindon J., H.J. Eysenck, and N.G. Martin.1989. Genes, culture and personality: An empirical approach. London: Academic Press .
16.
Eaves, Lindon J., and Peter K. Hatemi .2008. Transmission of attitudes toward abortion and gay rights: Parental socialization or parental mate selection?Behavior Genetics38: 247-56.
17.
Eaves, Lindon J., Peter K. Hatemi, E.C. Prom, and E.L. Murrelle.2008. Social and genetic influences on adolescent religious attitudes and practices. Social Forces86 (4): 1621-46.
18.
Eaves, Lindon J., Andrew Heath, Nicholas Martin, Hermine Maes, Michael Neale, Kenneth Kendler, Katherine Kirk, and Linda Corey.1999. Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Research2:62-80.
19.
Eysenck, H.J.1990. Biological dimensions of personality. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, ed. L. A. Pervin, 249-276. New York: Guilford .
20.
Eysenck, H.J., and M.W. Eysenck.1985. Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
21.
Fiorina, Morris P.1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Fowler, James H., Laura A. Baker, and Christopher T. Dawes.2008. Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review102 (2): 233-48.
23.
Francis, L.J., L.B. Brown, and P.R. Pearson.1991. The dual nature of the EPQ lie scale among university students in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences12 (10): 989-91.
24.
Glass, Jennifer, Vern L. Bengtson, and Charlotte C. Dunham .1986. Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, reciprocal influence?American Sociological Review51 (5): 685-98.
25.
Goren, Paul.2005. Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 881-96.
26.
Hatemi, Peter K.2006. The genetics of party identification and vote choice. Paper presented at the Hendricks Conference on Biology, Evolution, and Political Behavior, Lincoln, NE.
27.
Hatemi, Peter K.2007. The genetics of political attitudes. PhD diss., University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
28.
Hatemi, Peter K.2008. The pathway from biology to political behavior: initial findings of genetic association and linkage studies for political preferences . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Assocaition, Boston.
29.
Hatemi, Peter K., Cary L. Funk, Sarah E. Medland, Hermine H. Maes, Judy Silberg, Nicholas G. Martin, and Lindon J. Eaves .2008. Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes across the life-course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Paris.
30.
Hatemi, Peter K., Sarah E. Medland, and Lindon J. Eaves . Forthcoming. Genetic sources for the gender gap?Journal of Politics.
31.
Hatemi, Peter K., Sarah E. Medland, Katherine I. Morley, Andrew C. Heath, and Nicholas G. Martin .2007. The genetics of voting: An Australian twin study. Behavior Genetics37:435-448.
32.
Holzinger, Karl J.1929. The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin differences. Journal of Educational Psychology20:241-48.
33.
Hyman, Herbert.1959. Political socialization. Glencoe, IL : Free Press.
34.
Jennings, Kent M., Laura Stoker, and Jake Bowers.2001. Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Institute of Governmental Studies paper WP2001-15. http://repositories.cdlib.org/igs/WP2001-15 .
35.
Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger .1992. The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Kendler K.S., and J. Gardner.1998. Win studies of adult psychiatric and substance dependence disorders: are they biased by differences in the environmental experiences of monozygotic and dizygotic twins in childhood and adolescence ? Psychological Medicine28:625-33.
37.
Lakatos, Imre.1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91-196. London: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Loehlin, John C.1996. The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note. Behavior Genetics26 (1): 65-69.
39.
Loehlin, John C., and R.C. Nichols.1976. Heredity, environment, and personality: A study of 850 sets of twins. Austin: University of Texas Press.
40.
Maes, Hermine H., Michael C. Neale, and Lindon J. Eaves .1997. Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behavior Genetics27: 325-51.
41.
Martin, N.G., L.J. Eaves, A.C. Heath, R. Jardine, L.M. Feingold, and H.J. Eysenck.1986. Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science83:4364-68.
42.
McClosky, Herbert.1958. Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review52:27-45.
43.
Medland, Sarah E., and Peter K. Hatemi .2008. Political science, behavior genetics and twin studies: A methodological primer. SSRN working paper http://ssrn.com/abstract=1276483
44.
Medland, Sarah E., and Peter K. Hatemi . Forthcoming. Political science, behavior genetics and twin studies: A methodological primer. Political Analysis .
45.
Mednick, S.A., W.F. Gabrielli, and B. Hutchings.1984. Genetic influences in criminal convictions: Evidence from an adoption cohort. Science224:891-94.
46.
Moeller, Gerard, Ernest S. Barratt, Donald M. Dougherty, Joy M. Schmitz, and Alan C. Swann .2001. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity . American Journal of Psychiatry158:1783-93.
47.
Murphy, Nancy.1997. Anglo-American post-modernity, philosophical perspectives on science, religion, and ethics. New York: Westview.
48.
Neale, M., S. Boker, G. Xie, and H. Maes.2003. Mx: Statistical modeling. 5th ed. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry.
49.
Neale, Michael C., and Lon R. Cardon .1992. Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
50.
Neale, Michael C., Lindon J. Eaves, Kenneth S. Kendler, and John K. Hewitt .1989. Bias in correlations from selected samples of relatives. Behavior Genetics19:163-69.
51.
Niemi, Richard G., and M. Kent Jennings .1991. Issues and inheritance in the formation of party identification. American Journal of Political Science35:970-88.
52.
Page, Benjamin, and Calvin Jones.1979. Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review73:1071-90.
53.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
54.
Purcell S.2002. Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research5 (6): 554-71.
55.
Russell, Bertrand.2004. History of Western philosophy. New York: Routledge.
56.
Schattschneider, Elmer E.1957. Intensity, visibility, direction and scope. American Political Science Review51 (4):933-42.
57.
Suhay, Elizabeth, Nathan Kalmoe, and Christa McDermott .2007. Why twin studies are problematic for the study of political ideology: Rethinking "Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?"Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Portland, OR.
58.
Urbach, P.1974. Progress and degeneration in the IQ debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science25: 93-135.
59.
Visscher, Peter M.2008. Sizing up human height variation. Nature Genetics40(5):489-490
60.
Wilson, G., and Patterson, J.1968. A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology7:264-69.
