However boldly Francis Bacon might praise Machiavelli, he nevertheless formulates a powerful critique of his mentor's views regarding the means and aims of empire. Oriented by a prudential and normative commitment to philanthropia, Bacon reassesses the role of glory in political affairs and rejects key elements of Machiavelli's imperial vision. By deploying inversions of three Machiavellian images associated with empire—King Solomon rather than King David, the lowly mustard seed rather than Nebuchadnezzar's tree, and Themistocles rather than Fabius Maximus—Bacon signals his rejection of an imperial model based on violent conquest, a centralized and hierarchical structure, and conservative social and political values. In its place, he erects a new imperial model dedicated in principle to humanity, prosperity, and cosmopolitanism.
Armitage, David.2000. The ideological origins of the British Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bacon, Francis.1858-1874. The works of Francis Bacon, ed. J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, and D. D. Heath.London: Longman.
3.
Botero, Giovanni.1949. Ragion di Stato [Practical politics] by Giovanni Botero / Religion and the virtues of a Christian prince and against Machiavelli [Abridged] by Pedro Ribadeneyra, trans. G. A. Moore. Chevy Chase, MD: Country Dollar.
4.
Box, Ian.1996. Bacon's moral philosophy. In The Cambridge companion to Bacon, ed. Markku Peltonen.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Coby, J. Patrick.1999. Machiavelli's Romans: Liberty and greatness in the discourses on Livy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
Faulkner, Robert K.1988. Visions and powers: Bacon's two-fold politics of progress . Polity21:111-36.
7.
---. 1993. Francis Bacon and the project of progress. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Fischer, Markus.2006. Prologue: Machiavelli's rapacious republicanism. In Machiavelli's liberal republican legacy, ed. Paul A. Rahe, xxxi-lxii. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Hulliung, Mark.1983. Citizen Machiavelli. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
10.
Kennington, Richard.2004. Bacon's humanitarian revision of Machiavelli. In On modern origins: Essays in early modern philosophy, ed. P. Kraus and F. Hunt.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books .
11.
Livy, Titus.1982. Rome and Italy: Books VI-X of the history of Rome from its foundation, trans. Betty Radice. New York: Penguin.
12.
Machiavelli, Niccolò.1985. The prince, trans. H. Mansfield. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
13.
---. 1988. The Florentine histories, trans. L. Banfield and H. Mansfield . Chicago: Chicago University Press .
14.
---. 1996. Discourses on Livy, trans. H. Mansfield and N. Tarcov . Chicago: Chicago University Press .
15.
Mantena, Karuna. Forthcoming. Alibis of empire: Social theories and ideologies of late imperialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Mehta, Uday Singh.1999. Liberalism and empire: A study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
17.
Muthu, Sankar.2003. Enlightenment against empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Orsini, Napoleone.1936. Bacone e Machiavelli. Genova: E. degli Orfini.
19.
Orwin, Clifford.1978. Machiavelli's unchristian charity. American Political Science Review72:1217-28.
20.
Pagden, Anthony.1998. Lords of all the world: Ideologies of empire in Spain, Britain and France, c. 1500-c. 1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Paterson, Timothy.1987. On the role of Christianity in the political philosophy of Francis Bacon. Polity19:419-42.
22.
---. 1989. The secular control of scientific power in the political philosophy of Francis Bacon. Polity21:457-80.
23.
Peltonen, Markku.1992. Politics and science: Francis Bacon and the true greatness of states. The Historical Journal35:279-306.
24.
---. 1995. Classical humanism and republicanism in English political thought, 1570-1640. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
---. 1996. Bacon's political philosophy. In The Cambridge companion to Bacon, ed. Markku Peltonen.New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Pitts, Jennifer.2006. A turn to empire: The rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Plutarch.1992. Themistocles . In The lives of the noble Grecians and Romans, vol. I, trans. J. Dryden, ed. A. H. Clough.New York: Modern Library.
28.
Prior, Moody E.1954. Bacon's man of science. Journal of the History of Ideas15:348-70.
29.
Rahe, Paul A.1994. Partisans of humanity. In Republics ancient and modern, vol. II, New modes and orders in early modern political thought, 19-60. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
30.
---. 2006. Machiavelli and the English revolution. In Machiavelli's liberal republican legacy, ed. Paul A. Rahe, 9-35. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Strauss, Leo.1958. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
32.
Sullivan, Vickie B.1994. The civic humanist portrait of Machiavelli's English successors . History of Political Thought15:73-96.
33.
---. 1996. Machiavelli's threeRomes: Religion, human liberty, and politics reformed. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
34.
---. 2000. In defense of the city: Machiavelli's bludgeoning of the classical and Christian traditions. In Instilling ethics, ed. Norma Thompson.New York : Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
---. 2004. Machiavelli, Hobbes, and the formation of a liberal republicanism in England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Thucydides.1972. History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Red Warner. New York: Penguin.
37.
Weinberger, Jerry.1985. Science, faith, and politics: Francis Bacon and the utopian roots of the modern age. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
White, Howard.1958. Bacon's imperialism. American Political Science Review52:470-89.
39.
---. 1968. Peace among the willows: The political philosophy of FrancisBacon. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff .
40.
Zagorin, Perez.1998. Francis Bacon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
