This article offers a reading of Machiavelli’s il Principe and its relationship to his Discorsi which defends, first, the coherence of Machiavelli’s appeal to the figure of the one-man ordinatore and, second, a republican interpretation of il Principe. Its particular focus is on the pivotal role played in Machiavelli’s text-act by ‘love of worldly glory’. It is argued, first, that it is through love of glory that Machiavelli can coherently aim to produce an effective one-man ordinatore and, second, that the political education that il Principe provides to this figure leads them ineluctably to the conclusion that lasting glory can only be achieved through the foundation of a republic.
Aristotle (2009) Nichomachean Ethics, Ross D (ed.), Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
2.
Aristotle (1981) The Politics, Sinclair T (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
3.
BreinerP. Machiavelli’s “New Prince” and the primordial moment of acquisition. Political Theory2008; 36(1): 66–92.
4.
BennerE. Machiavelli’s Prince, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
5.
CoxV. Machiavelli and the Rhetorica as Herennium: Deliberative rhetoric in The Prince. The Sixteenth Century Journal1997; 28(4): 1109–1141.
6.
DietzM. Trapping the prince: Machiavelli and the politics of deception. The American Political Science Review1986; 80(3): 777–791.
7.
FallonS. Hunting the fox: Equivocation and authorial duplicity in The Prince. PMLA1992; 107(5): 1181–1195.
8.
HamptonT. Writing from history: The rhetoric of exemplarity in renaissance literature, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
9.
KahnV. Virtù and the example of Agathocles in Machiavelli's Prince. Representations1986; 13: 63–83.
10.
LangtonJDietzM. Machiavelli’s paradox: Trapping or teaching the prince. The American Political Science Review1987; 81(4): 1277–1288.
11.
LefortC. Machiavelli in the making, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2012.
12.
Lukes. Lionizing Machiavelli. American Political Science Association2001; 95(3): 561–575.
13.
Nietzsche F (2005) The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols and Other Writings, edited by Ridley A and translated by Norman J, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
OwenD. Pluralism and the pathos of distance: (or How to Relax with Style): Connolly, agonistic respect and the limits of political theory. British Journal of Politics and International Relations2008; 10(2): 210–226.
15.
PocockJGA. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
16.
PriceR. The theme of Gloria in Machiavelli. Renaissance Quarterly1977; 30(4): 588–631.
17.
ScottJTSullivanVB. Patricide and the plot of The Prince: Cesae Borgia and Machiavelli’s Italy. American Political Science Review1994; 88(4): 887–900.
18.
SkinnerQ. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought1978; Vol. 1Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
SkinnerQIntroduction. In: SkinnerQPriceR (eds). Machiavelli - The Prince, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. ix–xxiv.
20.
SkinnerQ. Visions of Politics (vol.2): Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
21.
TinklerJF. Praise and advice: Rhetorical approaches in More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s Prince. The Sixteenth Century Journal1988; 19(2): 187–207.
22.
WilliamsBPolitics and moral character. In: HampshireS (eds). Public and Private Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 55–74.
