Leftists seem to be on the rise in Latin America, but it is unclear to what extent this impacts policy. Thus, a crucial question hangs over this apparent “shift” in regional preferences: does the left have any real options to offer? Or in Latin America in an age of globalization, “what's left for the left?” The contending perspectives are compared, and then the evidence is evaluated using a series of econometric models. In sum, no discernible policy differences between the left and the rest were found. In the conclusion, the implications of this result for Latin American democracy are discussed.
Achen, Christopher H.2000. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, UCLA, July 20-22.
2.
Armijo, Leslie.2005. Mass democracy: The real reason that Brazil ended inflation ? World Development33: (12): 2013-28
3.
Avelino, George, David Brown, and Wendy Hunter.2005. The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980-1999. American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 625-41.
4.
Baker, Andy.2005. Who wants to globalize? Consumer tastes and labor markets in a theory of trade policy beliefs. American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 925-39.
5.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz .1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89:634-47.
6.
Beck, Thorstern, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh.2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15 (1): 165-76.
7.
Biglaiser, Glen, and Michelle Danis.2002. Privatization under democracy versus authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies35 (1): 83-102.
8.
Biglaiser, Glen, and Karl DeRouen.2004. The expansion of neoliberal economic reforms in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly48 (3): 561-78.
9.
Boix, Carles.1998. Political parties, growth and equality: Conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Brown, David S., and Wendy A. Hunter .1999. Democracy and social spending in Latin America, 1980-92. American Political Science Review93 (4): 779-90.
11.
Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum.2001. Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945-1998. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Casteneda, Jorge G.2006. Latin America's left turn. Foreign Affairs . May/June.
13.
Cohen, Benjamin.1998. The geography of money. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
14.
Coppedge, Michael.1997. A classification of Latin American political parties . Kellogg Institute Working Paper No. 244.
15.
Corrales, Javier.2000. Presidents, ruling parties, and party rules. Comparative Politics32 (2): 127-50.
16.
Corrales, Javier.2006a. The many lefts of Latin America. Foreign Policy. November/December.
17.
Corrales, Javier.2006b. Hugo Boss. Foreign Policy. January/February.
18.
Etchemendy, Sebastian.2001. Constructing reform coalitions: The politics of compensations in Argentina's economic liberalization. Latin American Politics and Society43 (3): 1-35.
19.
Frieden, Jeffry.1991. Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization45 (4): 425-51.
20.
Garrett, Geoffrey.1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Peter Lange.1991. Political responses to interdependence: "What's `left' for the Left." International Organization45 (4): 539-64.
22.
Geddes, Barbara.1995. The politics of economic liberalization. Latin American Research Review30 (2): 195-214.
23.
Golder, Matt.2005. Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000 . Electoral Studies24 (1): 103-21.
24.
Green, Duncan.2003. Silent revolution: The rise and crisis and market economics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
25.
Haggard, Stephen, and Robert Kaufman.1995. The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Haggard, Stephan, and Mathew D. McCubbins, eds. 2001. Presidents, parliaments and policy. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hausmann, Ricardo, Michael Gavin, Carmen Pages-Serra, and Ernesto Stein.1999. Financial turmoil and the choice of exchange rate regime. Working Paper No. 400. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank. http://www.iadb.org.
28.
Kaufman, Robert, and Alex Segura-Ubiergo.2001. Globalization, domestic politics and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-1997. World Politics53 (4): 553-87.
29.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers.2003. Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2003.
30.
Martinez, Juan, and Javier Santiso.2003. Financial markets and politics: The confidence game in Latin American emerging economies. International Political Science Review243: 363-95.
31.
Maxfield, Sylvia.1998. Understanding the political implication of financial internationalization in emerging market countries. World Development26 (7): 1201-19.
32.
Montero, Alfred.1998. State interests and the new industrial policy in Brazil: The privatization of steel, 1990-1994. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs40 (3): 27-62.
33.
Morley, Samuel A., Roberto Machado, and Stefano Pettinato .1999. Indices of structural reform in Latin America. ECLAC Serie Reformas Economicas12. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.
34.
Murillo, Victoria.2002. Political bias in policy convergence. Privatization choices in Latin America. World Politics54 (4): 462-93.
35.
Oatley, Thomas.1999. How constraining is capital mobility? The partisan hypothesis in an open economy. American Journal of Political Science43 (4): 1003-27.
36.
Plümper, Thomas, and Vera E. Troeger .2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis15 (2): 124-39.
Santiso, Javier.2005. The political economy of emerging markets: Actors, institutions and financial crises in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
39.
Schamis, Hector.1999. Distributional coalitions and the politics of economic reform in Latin America. World Politics51 (2): 236-68.
40.
Smith, Dale, Joseph K. Young, and Quan Li.2005. The non-linear politics of capital liberalization in Latin America. Paper Presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association.
41.
Stokes, Susan.2001. Mandates and democracy: Neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Strange, Susan.1996. The retreat of the State: The diffusion of power in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Strange, Susan.1997. Casino Capitalism. University of Manchester Press.
44.
Tornell, Aaron.1995. Are economic crises necessary for trade liberalization and fiscal reform: The Mexican experience. In Reform, recovery, and growth: Latin America and the Middle East, ed. Rudiger Dornbusch and Sebastian Edwards.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Weyland, Kurt.2002. The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Wibbels, Erik, and Moises Arce.2003. Globalization, taxation, and burden-shifting in Latin America. International Organization57:111-35.
