The role of ideas has been neglected, in comparison with the role of interests and institutions, in the literature on neoliberal reform in Latin America. While ideas were not the primary cause of neoliberal reform, their development, articulation, and dissemination are a significant part of the story of the rise and fall of the “Washington Consensus.” The neoliberalism of the 1980s and 1990s lost credibility and capacity to provide politically feasible policy guidelines because it was based on an elitist, exclusionary pact among small groups of experts and elites representing the interests of transnational capital. Only by understanding the origins and limitations of the ideas behind neoliberal reform can a new, more inclusive economic model for Latin America be created.
Armijo, Leslie Elliot and Philippe Faucher2002 “We have a consensus: explaining political support for market reforms in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society44 (2).
2.
Barry, Christian and Sanjay Reddy2005 “Just linkage: international trade and labor standards .” August 25. Draft 1.61. http://www.alternatefutures.org (accessed September 27, 2005).
3.
Biersteker, Thomas J.1990 “Reducing the role of the state in the economy: a conceptual exploration of IMF and World Bank prescriptions.” International Studies Quarterly34: 477—492.
4.
1992 “The triumph of neoclassical economics in the developing world: policy convergence and bases of governance in the international economic order,” pp. 102—132 in James Rosenau and Ernst-OttoCzempiel (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Birdsall, Nancy and Augusto de la Torre2001Washington Contentious: Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Inter-American Dialogue.
6.
Broad, Robin2003The Washington Consensus Meets the Global Backlash: The Shifting Debate Over Development in Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the International Studies Association meeting , Portland, OR, February.
7.
Broad, Robin and John Cavanagh1999 “The death of the Washington Consensus?” World Policy Journal17 (Fall): 79—88.
8.
Burki, Shahid Javed and Guillermo E. Perry1997The Long March: A Reform Agenda for Latin America and the Caribbean in the Next Decade. Washington, DC: World Bank.
9.
1998Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. Washington, DC: World Bank.
10.
Cartapanis, André and Michel Herland2002 “The reconstruction of the international financial architecture: Keynes' revenge?” Review of International Political Economy9: 257—283.
11.
Centeno, Miguel A. and Patricio Silva (eds.) 1998The Politics of Expertise in Latin America . Houndmills and London: Macmillan.
12.
Clark, Ian D.1996Should the IMF Become More Adaptive? International Monetary Fund Working Paper 17-EA .
13.
Drake, Paul2000 “ The hegemony of U.S. economic doctrines in Latin America.” Paper delivered at the Seminar on Latin American Political Economy, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, September.
14.
Economist2005 “Poverty in Latin America: New thinking about an old problem.” September 17—23, 36—38.
15.
Edwards, Sebastian1995Crisis and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank.
16.
Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo2000Reforming the Reforms in Latin America: Macroeconomics, Trade, Finance. New York: St. Martin's Press.
17.
Friedman, Thomas L.1999The Lexus and the Olive Tree. New York : Anchor Books.
18.
Goldstein, Judith and Robert O. Keohane1993 “Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework,” pp. 3—30 in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
19.
Goldstein, Morris2000 “IMF structural conditionality: how much is too much ?” MS, revision of paper presented at NBER Conference “Economic and Financial Crises in Emerging Market Economies,” Woodstock,VT, October 19—21.
20.
Gore, Charles2000 “The rise and fall of the Washington Consensus as a paradigm for developing countries.” World Development28: 789—804.
21.
Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman1995 “The challenges of consolidation ,” pp. 1—12 in Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner (eds.), Economic Reform and Democracy. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
Haggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman (eds.) 1992The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
Hagopian, Frances2004 “Authoritarian legacies and market reforms in Latin America,” pp. 88—158 in Katherine Hite and Paola Cesarini (eds.), Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe . Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
Hall, Peter A. (ed.) 1989The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
Hardt, Michael2002 “Today's Bandung?” New Left Review14 (March/April): 112—118.
26.
Hayek, Friedrich A.1944The Road to Serfdom. Chicago : Phoenix Books/University of Chicago Press .
27.
Held, David1995Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
Held, David and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (eds.) 2003Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
Held, David and Anthony McGrew (eds.) 2002Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Huber, Evelyne and Fred Solt2004 “Successes and failures of neoliberalism.” Latin American Research Review39 (3): 150—163.
31.
Kahler, Miles1992 “External influence, conditionality, and the politics of adjustment,” pp. 89—132 in Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
Krueger, Anne O.1998 “Whither the World Bank and the IMF?” Journal of Economic Literature36: 1983—2020.
33.
Krugman, Paul1995 “Cycles of conventional wisdom on economic development .” International Affairs71: 717—732.
34.
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo and John Williamson (eds.) 2003After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics .
35.
Lora, Eduardo and Ugo Panizza2002Structural Reforms in Latin America under Scrutiny. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper Series 470.
36.
Mann, Michael2002 “Globalization after September 11.” New Left Review15 (November/December): 75—92.
37.
Margheritis, Ana2003 “ Foreign policy and domestic restructuring in Latin America: recent achievements and future challenges,” in Ana Margheritis (ed.), Latin American Democracies in the New Global Economy . Coral Gables, FL.: North-South Center Press/Lynne Rienner.
38.
Melanson, Richard A.1991Reconstructing Consensus: American Foreign Policy since the Vietnam War. New York: St. Martin's Press.
39.
Micklethwait, John and Adrian Wooldridge2003 “Rebuilding the alliance to rebuild globalization.” New York Times, April 13.
40.
Naím, Moisés1995 “Latin America: the second stage of reform,” pp. 28—44 in Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner (eds.), Economic Reform and Democracy. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
1999 “Fads and fashion in economic reforms: Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion?” Paper prepared for the IMF Conference on Second-Generation Reforms, Washington, DC, October 26.
42.
Peeler, John A.1998Building Democracy in Latin America. Boulder and London : Lynne Rienner.
43.
Phillips, Nicola and Richard Higgott1999Global Governance and the Public Domain: Collective Goods in a “Post-Washington Consensus” Era. University of Warwick Center for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Working Paper 47/99.
44.
Polanyi, Karl 2001 (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston : Beacon Press.
45.
Przeworski, Adam et al. 1997Sustainable Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Reddy, Sanjay2005 “Safety nets for the poor: a missing international dimension.” MS, UNRISD Program on Social Policy in a Development Context, New York.
47.
Robinson, William I.1999 “Latin America in the age of inequality: confronting the new `Utopia.'” International Studies Review1 (3): 41—67.
48.
2001“Social theory and globalization: the rise of a transnational state.” Theory and Society30: 157—200.
49.
2004 “Global crisis and Latin America” Bulletin of Latin American Research23: 135—153. 2005 “Global capitalism: the new transnationalism and the folly of conventional thinking.” Science & Society69: 316—328.
50.
Rodrik, Dani2000 “Has globalization gone too far?” pp. 298—305 in J. Timmons Roberts and Amy Hite (eds.), From Globalization to Development . Malden, MA: Blackwell .
51.
Sen, Amartya1999Development asFreedom. New York: Anchor Books.
52.
Silva, Eduardo2004 “ The structural power of capital, social mobilization, and neoliberal order in Latin America.” Paper prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, October 8—10.
53.
Simmons, Beth A. and Zachary Elkins2004 “The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy.” American Political Science Review98: 171—189.
54.
Soederberg, Susanne2001 “The Emperor 's new suit: the new international financial architecture as a reinvention of the Washington Consensus.” Global Governance7: 453—467.
55.
Stallings, Barbara1992 “ International influence on economic policy: debt, stabilization, and structural reform,” pp. 41—88 in Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
Stallings, Barbara and Wilson Peres2000Growth, Employment, and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: UN Economic Commission for Latin America/ Brookings Institution.
57.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.1998More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture . Helsinki, Finland.
58.
2002Globalization and Its Discontents. New York and London: W. W. Norton .
59.
Taylor, Lance1999After Neoliberalism: What Next for Latin America ? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
Teichman, Judith A.2001The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America. Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.
61.
Wade, Robert2003 “The disturbing rise in poverty and inequality: is it all a `big lie'?” pp. 18—46 in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (eds.), Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge : Polity Press.
62.
Waldron, Jeremy2002 “Justice,” pp. 266—285 in IraKatznelson and Helen V. Milner (eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline . New York: W. W. Norton/ American Political Science Association.
63.
Wall Street Journal Americas1999 “The free market still scores highly among Latin Americans.” Spring, 1, 6.
64.
Walton, Michael2004 “Neoliberalism in Latin America: Good, bad, or incomplete? ” Latin American Research Review39 (3): 165—183.
65.
Waltz, Kenneth1999 “Globalization and governance.” (James Madison Lecture.) PS Online, 1—13.
66.
Weyland, Kurt1996 “Risk-taking in Latin American economic restructuring .” International Studies Quarterly40: 185—207.
67.
2004 “Assessing Latin American neoliberalism: introduction to a debate.” Latin American Research Review39 (3): 143—149.
68.
Williamson, John1999 “What should the bank think about the Washington Consensus?” Paper prepared as a background to the World Bank's World Development Report2000.
69.
2002 “Did the Washington Consensus Fail?” Outline of remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 6. http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson1102.htm.
70.
Williamson, John (ed.) 1990Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
71.
Zoellick, Robert2002 “Unleashing the trade winds.” Economist. December 7, 27—29.
