This article describes the mechanisms by which small design changes in medical tools can improve physicians’ job performance. It focuses on a new type of urine bag used in hospitals, which is easier to read from a distance because it has a floating marker, bigger numbers, and color labels. The study found that doctors made fewer mistakes and felt more comfortable using the new bag compared to the usual one. These outcomes indicate that improving how tools look and work can make healthcare safer and faster, helping both doctors and patients.
CarayonP.Schoofs HundtA.KarshB. T.GursesA. P.AlvaradoC. J.SmithM.BrennanP. F. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl 1), i50–i58. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015842
3.
Della TorreV.NaculF.RosseelP.BaidH.BhowmickK.SzawarskiP.SahooT. K.UtkuT.WongA.MalbrainM. L. N. G. (2021). Human factors and ergonomics to improve performance in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 53(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2021.105760
4.
EklundA.VanderLindenJ. (2014). A new automatic urinometer shows lower bias, no loss of precision due to temporal deviation and higher user evaluation when compared with a manual standard urinometer in an ICU setting. Critical Care, 18(Suppl 1), P163. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13353
5.
HerschM.KanterL. (2005). A new electronic urine meter (UREXACT) is more accurate in measuring urine output than the standard urinometer: A comparative study. Critical Care, 9(Suppl 1), P409. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3640
6.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2000).KohnL. T.CorriganJ. M.DonaldsonM. S. (Eds.), To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9728
7.
MasulliF.GalluccioM.GerardC. L.PeyreH.RovettaS.BucciM. P. (2018). Effect of different font sizes and of spaces between words on eye movement performance: An eye tracker study in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. Vision Research, 153, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.008
8.
MinorJ.SmithA.DeutschF.KellumJ. A. (2021). Automated versus manual urine output monitoring in the intensive care unit. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 17429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97026-8
9.
RosenfieldM. (2016). Computer vision syndrome: A review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 36(5), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12313
10.
SchmidK. L.HilmerK. S.LawrenceR. A.LohS. Y.MorrishL. J.BrownB. (2005). The effect of common reductions in letter size and contrast on accommodation responses in young adult myopes and emmetropes. Optometry and Vision Science, 82(7), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000171337.02376.60
11.
SheppardA. L.WolffsohnJ. S. (2018). Digital eye strain: Prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 3(1), Article e000146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146
12.
TianP.XuG.HanC.ZhengX.ZhangK.DuC.WeiF.ZhangS. (2022). Effects of paradigm color and screen brightness on visual fatigue in light environment of night based on eye tracker and EEG acquisition equipment. Sensors, 22(11), 4082. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22114082
13.
WestbrookJ. I.CoieraE.DunsmuirW. T. M.BrownB. M.KelkN.PaoloniR.TranC. (2010). The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(4), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.039255
