The impact of climate change should be a key concern of those in the human factors/ergonomics (HF/E) discipline. Our specialized knowledge and expertise can be applied toward mitigating the effects of climate change. In this article, we unite two perspectives to illustrate how HF/E can more productively contribute to the research and practice of sustainability. First, we describe differing forms of cross-disciplinary research, with a particular focus on the notion of transdisciplinary research and the concept of hedonomic design. Second, we unite these ideas to illustrate how they provide a set of complementary concepts that can guide HF/E sustainability research.
BrandtP.ErnstA.GrallaF.LüderitzC.LangD.NewigJ.ReinertF.AbsonD.von WehrdenH. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15.
3.
BuczynskiB. (2013, August15). Passengers trade trash for subway tickets in Beijing. Earth Techling. Retrieved from http://www.earthtechling.com/
4.
ChakrabortyJ.BahrP. H. (2009, June). Sizzling green: Integrated design process for greener institutional kitchens. Paper presented at the 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Quebec City, Canada.
5.
ChapmanP. (2012, March7). Entire nation of Kiribati to be relocated over rising sea level threat. Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk
6.
CutterS. L.BoruffB. J.ShirleyW. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242–261.
7.
DarbellayF.CockellM.BillotteJ.WaldvogelF. (Eds.). (2008). A vision of transdisciplinarity: Laying foundations for a world knowledge dialogue. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
8.
DunneJ. P.StoufferR. J.JohnJ. G. (2013). Reductions in labour capacity from heat stress under climate warming. Nature Climate Change. Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/nclimate1827
9.
EasterlinR. A.McVeyL. A.SwitekM.SawangfaO.Smith ZweigJ. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 22463–22468.
10.
FioreS. M.SchoolerJ. W. (2004). Process mapping and shared cognition: Teamwork and the development of shared problem models. In SalasE.FioreS. M. (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 133–152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
FlemmingS. A.HilliardA.JamiesonG. A. (2008, September). The need for human factors in the sustainability domain. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting (pp. 748–752). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
GansW.AlberiniA.LongoA. (2013). Smart meter devices and the effect of feedback on residential electricity consumption: Evidence from a natural experiment in northern Ireland. Energy Ergonomics, 36, 729–743.
13.
GillisJ. (2013, January8). Not even close: 2012 was hottest ever in U.S. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
GroseT. (2013, August). Urban ski slope to raise profile of Europe’s waste-to-energy drive. National Geographic. Retrieved from http://www.nationalgeographic.com
16.
HadornG. H.PohlC.BammerG. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In FrodemanR.Thompson KleinJ.MitchamC. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity (pp. 431–452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
HallK. L.VogelA. L.StipelmanB. A.StokolsD.MorganG.GehlertS. (2012). A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: Goals, team processes, and strategies. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2, 415–430.
18.
HancockP. A.PepeA. A.MurphyL. L. (2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design, 13(1), 8–14.
19.
HolmesT. G. (2007). Eco-visualization: Combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 153–162). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1254960.1254982
20.
HustedB. W. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45, 349–371.
21.
InglesB. (2011). Bjarke Ingels: Hedonistic sustainability [Technology, Entertainment, and Design (TED) talk]. Available from http://www.ted.com/talks
22.
International Living Future Institute. (2012). Living building challenge 2.1: A visionary path to a restorative future. Retrieved from https://ilbi.org/lbc/LBC%20Documents/lbc-2.1
23.
KesselheimA. (2010). Twin Bridges: Rural friendliness pays dividends. Adventure Cyclist. Retrieved from http://www.adventurecycling.org/
24.
KjellstromT.GabryschS.LemkeB.DearK. (2009). The “Hothaps” programme for assessing climate change impacts on occupational health and productivity: An invitation to carry out field studies. Global Health Action, 2, 1–7. doi:10.3402/gha.v2i0.2082
25.
KleinJ. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515–526.
26.
KleinJ. T. (2005). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S116–S123.
27.
KleinJ. T. (2005). Humanities, culture, and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
KleinJ. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In FrodemanR.KleinJ. T.MitchamC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
LangD. J.WiekA.BergmannM.StauffacherM.MartensP.MollP.SwillingM.ThomasC. J. (2011). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
30.
McCartyJ. A.ShrumL. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 20, 93–104.
31.
MooreD.BarnardT. (2012). With eloquence and humanity? Human factors/ergonomics in sustainable human development. Human Factors, 54, 940–951. doi:10.1177/0018720812468483
32.
National Academies, Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
33.
NickersonR. S. (1995). Emerging needs and opportunities for human factors research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
34.
PazM.SellersB. C.FioreS. M.RichardsL. (2012). Integrating principles of environmental sustainability into human factors education: A recommendation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting (pp. 1832–1836). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi:10.1177/1071181312561369
35.
PhillipsE.SellersB.FioreS. M. (2010). Human-centric environmentalism: Opportunities for the human factors community to contribute to global environmental solutions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting (pp. 793–797). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi:10.1177/154193121005401112
36.
PohlC.HadornG. H. (2008a). Core terms in transdisciplinary research. In HadornG. H.Hoffmann-RiemH.Biber-KlemmS.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.JoyeD.PohlC.WiesmannU.ZempE. (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 427–432). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
37.
PohlC.HadornG. H. (2008b). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 111–121.
SamsonJ.BerteauxD.McGillB. J.HumphriesM. M. (2011). Geographic disparities and moral hazards in the predicted impacts of climate change on human populations. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 532–544.
40.
SellersB. C.FioreS. M. (2013). Sustainability through user-centered design: Applying human factors analyses to improve the effectiveness of “green” buildings. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting (pp. 550–554). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. doi:10.1177/1541931213571118
41.
SellersB. C.FioreS. M.SzalmaJ. (2013). Developing a scale of environmental efficacy. International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice, 8, 169–195.
42.
StokolsD. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63–77.
43.
StokolsD. (2010). Training the next generation of transdisciplinarians. In O’RourkeM.CrowleyS.EigenbrodeS. D.WulfhorstJ. D. (Eds.), Enhancing communication and collaboration in interdisciplinary research (pp. 56–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
StokolsD.HallK. L.TaylorB.MoserR. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 35(2S), S77–S89.
45.
StokolsD.MisraS.RunnerstromM.G.HippJ.A. (2009). Psychology in an age of ecological crisis: From personal angst to collective action. American Psychologist, 64, 181–193.
46.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (2009). National Household Travel Survey. Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov
47.
WagnerC. S.RoessnerJ. D.BobbK.KleinJ. T.BoyakK. W.KeytonJ.RafolsI.BörnerK. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 14–26.
48.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
