Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hedonomic design aims to make products not just easy to use, but pleasurable. Toward this goal, designers often use mood boards of abstract visual images to represent the aesthetic and affective response they would like their designs to evoke. We studied the effect of aging on viewers' ability to understand the meanings of abstract images selected by designers to express specific affective concepts. Young adult and older adult participants made visual judgment on the affective images. Data showed no age-related differences in the judgment accuracy. Results suggest that elderly adults can extract emotional meanings from young designers' mood boards as well as do young adults, and that affective product semantics may communicate similar meanings to users of different age group.

Keywords

Visual communication Aging Affective Design Hedonomics Product Design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Charles

S. T.

Mather

Carstensen

L. L.

(2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132 (2), 310–324.

Demirbilek

Sener

(2003). Product design, semantics, and emotional response. Ergonomics, 46, 1346–1360.

Hancock

P. A.

Pepe

A. A.

Murphy

L. L.

(2005). Hedonomics: The power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 13 (1), 8–14.

Helander

M. G.

Tham

M. P.

(2003). Hedonomics-affective human factors design. Ergonomics, 46, 1269–1272.

Luce

R. D.

(1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.

Mather

Carstensen

L. L.

(2003). Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychological Science, 14, 409–415.

Mather

Carstensen

L. L.

(2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9 (10), 496–502.

McDonagh

(2008). Do it until it hurts!: Empathic design research. Design principles and practices: an international journal, 2 (3), 103–110.

McDonagh

Denton

(2005). Exploring the degree to which individual students share a common perception of specific mood boards: Observations relating to teaching, learning and team-based design. Design Studies, 26, 35–53.

10.

Norman

D. A.

(2005). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Smith

J. E. K.

(1982). Simple algorithms for M-alternative forced-choice calculations. Perception & Psychophysics, 31 (1), 95–96.

Transgenerational communication through affective imagery in mood boards

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References