Comparison of Intensive Care Unit Medication Errors Reported to the United States’ MedMarx and the United Kingdom’s National Reporting and Learning System
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2014
Comparison of Intensive Care Unit Medication Errors Reported to the United States’ MedMarx and the United Kingdom’s National Reporting and Learning System
The objective was to compare the characteristics of medication errors reported to 2 national error reporting systems by conducting a cross-sectional analysis of errors reported from adult intensive care units to the UK National Reporting and Learning System and the US MedMarx system. Outcome measures were error types, severity of patient harm, stage of medication process, and involved medications. The authors analyzed 2837 UK error reports and 56 368 US reports. Differences were observed between UK and US errors for wrong dose (44% vs 29%), omitted dose (8.6% vs 27%), and stage of medication process (prescribing: 14% vs 49%; administration: 71% vs 42%). Moderate/severe harm or death was reported in 4.9% of UK versus 3.4% of US errors. Gentamicin was cited in 7.4% of the UK versus 0.7% of the US reports (odds ratio = 9.25). There were differences in the types of errors reported and the medications most often involved. These differences warrant further examination.
LeapeLLBrennanTALairdN, The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377-384.
2.
BrennanTALeapeLLLairdNM, Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370-376.
3.
BondCARaehlCLFrankeT. Medication errors in United States hospitals. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:1023-1036.
PhamJCStoryJLHicksRW, National study on the frequency, types, causes, and consequences of voluntarily reported emergency department medication errors. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:485-492.
8.
DeanBSAllanELBarberNDBarkerKN. Comparison of medication errors in an American and a British hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52:2543-2549.
9.
WirtzVTaxisKBarberND. An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25:104-111.
10.
CousinsDHSabatierBBegueDSchmittCHoppe-TichyT. Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and France. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:190-195.
11.
CullenDJSweitzerBJBatesDWBurdickREdmondsonALeapeLL. Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1289-1297.
12.
PhamJCColantuoniEDominiciF, The harm susceptibility model: a method to prioritise risks identified in patient safety reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:440-445.
13.
MartinezEAShoreAColantuoniE, Cardiac surgery errors: results from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:151-158.
PhamJCAndrawisMShoreADFaheyMMorlockLPronovostPJ. Are temporary staff associated with more severe emergency department medication errors?J Healthc Qual. 2011;33:9-18.
ValentinACapuzzoMGuidetB, Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1591-1598.
18.
CalabreseADErstadBLBrandlKBarlettaJFKaneSLShermanDS. Medication administration errors in adult patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1592-1598.
19.
Kane-GillSLJacobiJRothschildJM. Adverse drug events in intensive care units: risk factors, impact, and the role of team care. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(6, suppl):S83-S89.
20.
BenkiraneRRAbouqalRHaimeurCC, Incidence of adverse drug events and medication errors in intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. J Patient Saf. 2009;5:16-22.
21.
GallagherTHWatermanADEbersAGFraserVJLevinsonW. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003;289:1001-1007.
22.
PanesarSSClearyKSheikhA. Reflections on the National Patient Safety Agency’s database of medical errors. J R Soc Med. 2009;102:256-258.
23.
SarvadikarAPrescottGWilliamsD. Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66:843-853.
24.
NealeGVincentCDarziSA. The problem of engaging hospital doctors in promoting safety and quality in clinical care. J R Soc Promot Health. 2007;127:87-94.
25.
CapuzzoMNawfalICampiMValpondiVVerriMAlvisiR. Reporting of unintended events in an intensive care unit: comparison between staff and observer. BMC Emerg Med. 2005;5:3.
26.
WaldML. Fatal airplane crashes drop 65%. New York Times. October1, 2007:C1.
27.
KeelingPScalesKKeelingSBorthwickM. Towards IV drug standardization in critical care. Br J Nurs. 2010;19:S30-S33.
28.
FreyBBuettikerVHugMI, Does critical incident reporting contribute to medication error prevention?Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161:594-599.
