Research on sexual objectification has mostly taken a heterosexual perspective and has studied gay men to understand when they become victims rather than agents of this phenomenon. In three studies we investigated gay men as agents of sexual objectification and the underlying motives that guide their biased perceptions. In Study 1, using electroencephalography, gay men showed to objectify women more than men. In Study 2a and Study 2b, results confirmed this tendency and demonstrated that exposure to sexually objectified depictions of women on content-rather than relational-based (social) media was positively related to the sexual objectification of women. Media exposure to female sexualization can increase and explain why women remain the target of sexual objectification regardless of one’s sexual orientation.
AndersonJ. R.HollandE.KocY.HaslamN. (2018). iObjectify: Self- and other-objectification on Grindr, a geosocial networking application designed for men who have sex with men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(5), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2350
2.
BartkyS. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Psychology Press.
3.
BernardP.CogoniC.CarnaghiA. (2020). The sexualization–objectification link: Sexualization affects the way people see and feel toward others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419898187
4.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23(5), 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434748
5.
BevensC. L.LoughnanS. (2019). Insights into Men’s sexual aggression toward women: Dehumanization and objectification. Sex Roles, 81(11-12), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01024-0
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3, 1909–1912. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613
8.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992
9.
CogoniC.CarnaghiA.MitrovicA.LederH.FantoniC.SilaniG. (2018). Understanding the mechanisms behind the sexualized-body inversion hypothesis: The role of asymmetry and attention biases. PLoS One, 13(4), Article e0193944. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193944
10.
CogoniC.CarnaghiA.SilaniG. (2018). Reduced empathic responses for sexually objectified women: An fMRI investigation. Cortex, 99, 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.020
11.
CogoniC.CarnaghiA.SilaniG. (2021). Reduced shared emotional representations toward women revealing more skin. Cognition & Emotion, 35(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1826409
12.
DavidsC. M.WatsonL. B.NilssonJ. E.MarszalekJ. M. (2015). Body dissatisfaction among gay men: The roles of sexual objectification, gay community involvement, and psychological sense of community. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000127
13.
De GelderB.Van den StockJ.MeerenH. K. M.SinkeC. B. A.KretM. E.TamiettoM. (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008
14.
DetersF. GMehlM. R. (2013). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469233
15.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
16.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-6402.1997.Tb00108.X
GrayK.KnobeJ.SheskinM.BloomP.BarrettL. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883
19.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.PuviaE. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
20.
HollandE.KovalP.StratemeyerM.ThomsonF.HaslamN. (2017). Sexual objectification in women’s daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12152
21.
JeffreysS. (2014). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. Routledge.
22.
KovalP.HollandE.ZyphurM. J.StratemeyerM.KnightJ. M.BailenN. H.ThompsonR. J.RobertsT.-A.HaslamN. (2019). How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women’s emotions in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000161
23.
KozakM.FrankenhauserH.RobertsT. A. (2009). Objects of desire: Objectification as a function of male sexual orientation. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10(3), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016257
24.
KrasnovaH.WenningerH.WidjajaT.BuxmannP. (2013). Envy on Facebook: A hidden threat to users’ life satisfaction? In Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings, (Vol. 92). https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2013/92
25.
LanzieriN.HildebrandtT. (2016). Using objectification theory to examine the effects of media on gay male body image. Clinical Social Work Journal, 44(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0562-1
26.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.MurnaneT.VaesJ.ReynoldsC.SuitnerC. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.755
27.
PeciniC.GuizzoF.BonacheH.Borges-CastellsN.MoreraM. D.VaesJ. (2023). Sexual objectification: Advancements and avenues for future research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 50, Article 101261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101261
28.
PeciniC.RuzzanteD.ValtortaR. R.CrapolicchioE.CoccoV. M.AndrighettoL.Di BernardoG. A. (2023). Why might women justify dating violence? The role of men’s sexual objectification of their romantic partners within heterosexual relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(19-20), 10664–10685. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231175515
29.
PiccoliV.ForoniF.CarnaghiA. (2013). Comparing group dehumanization and intra-sexual competition among normally ovulating women and hormonal contraceptive users. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1600–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499025
30.
PlantA.DevineP. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
31.
PuviaE.VaesJ. (2013). Being a body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Sex Roles, 68(7-8), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0255-y
32.
PuviaE.VaesJ. (2015). Promoters versus victims of objectification: Why women dehumanize sexually objectified female targets. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28(1), 63–93. https://www.cairn.info/revue--2015-1-page-63.htm
33.
RussellE. M.IckesW.TaV. P. (2018). Women interact more comfortably and intimately with gay men—but not straight men—after learning their sexual orientation. Psychological Science, 29(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617733803
34.
SanchezD. T.KieferA. K.YbarraO. (2006). Sexual Submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282154
35.
SinghD. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
36.
SouleymanovR.BrennanD. J.GeorgeC.UtamaR.CerantoA. (2020). Experiences of racism, sexual objectification and alcohol use among gay and bisexual men of colour. Ethnicity and Health, 25(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2018.1439895
37.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200
38.
SzymanskiD. M.MikorskiR.DunnT. L. (2019). Predictors of sexual minority men’s sexual objectification of other men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11-12), 3631–3650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519832669
39.
VaesJ.CogoniC.CalcagnìA. (2020). Resolving the human–object divide in sexual objectification: How we settle the categorization conflict when categorizing objectified and nonobjectified human targets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875142
40.
VaesJ.CristoforettiG.RuzzanteD.CogoniC.MazzaV. (2019). Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 6699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42928-x
41.
VaesJ.LoughnanS.PuviaE. (2013). The inhuman body: When sexual objectification becomes dehumanizing. In BainP. G.VaesJ.LeyensJ.-P. (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 186–204). Psychology Press.
42.
VaesJ.PaladinoP.PuviaE. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.824
43.
VaillancourtT.SharmaA. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413
44.
VerduynP.LeeD. S.ParkJ.ShablackH.OrvellA.BayerJ.YbarraO.JonidesJ.KrossE. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057
WatsonL. B.DispenzaF. (2014). Experiences of objectification and sexual risk behaviors among sexual minority men. Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity, 1(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000014
47.
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010a). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018937
48.
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010b). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018937
49.
WrightP. J.TokunagaR. S. (2016). Men’s objectifying media consumption, objectification of women, and attitudes supportive of violence against women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0644-8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
