JacobiJRaySDanelichI, et al. Impact of the pharmacy practice model initiative on clinical pharmacy specialist practice. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:e40-e49.
7.
SmithM. Primary care pharmacist services align with payment reform and provider “joy of practice.”Ann Pharmacother. 2019;53:311-315.
EcclesMPMittmanBS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1:1.
11.
WensingM. Implementation science in healthcare: introduction and perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109:97-102.
12.
LivetMHainesSTCurranGM, et al. Implementation science to advance care delivery: a primer for pharmacists and other health professionals. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38:490-502.
13.
NilsenP. Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
14.
TabakRGKhoongECChambersDABrownsonRC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:337-350.
15.
DamschroderLJAronDCKeithREKirshSRAlexanderJALoweryJC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
16.
AtkinsLFrancisJIslamR, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behavior change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:77.
17.
ChaudoirSRDuganAGBarrCHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22.
18.
MeyersDCDurlakJAWandersmanA. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:462-480.
19.
MoullinJCDicksonKSStadnickNARabinBAaronsGA. Systematic review of the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14:1.
20.
GlasgowREVogtTMBolesSM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322-1327.
21.
BlanchardCLivetMWardCSorgeLSorensenTDMcClurgMR. The active implementation frameworks: a roadmap for advancing implementation of comprehensive medication management in primary care. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13:922-929.
22.
FathimaMSainiBFosterJMArmourCL. A mixed methods analysis of community pharmacists’ perspectives on delivering COPD screening service to guide future implementation. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15:662-672.
23.
ShoemakerSJCurranGMSwanHTeeterBSThomasJ. Application of the consolidated framework for implementation research to community pharmacy: a framework for implementation research on pharmacy services. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13:905-913.
24.
RobinsLSJacksonEGreenBBKorngiebelDForceRWBaldwinLM. Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based blood pressure control in community practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2013;26:539-557.
25.
JonesLFOwensRSallisA, et al. Qualitative study using interviews and focus groups to explore the current and potential for antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacy informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e025101.
26.
MottDAMartinBBreslowR, et al. The development of a community-based, pharmacist-provided falls prevention MTM intervention for older adults: relationship building, methods, and rationale. Innov Pharm. 2014;5:140.
27.
FormanJHeislerMDamschroderLJKaselitzEKerrEA. Development and application of the RE-AIM QuEST mixed methods framework for program evaluation. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:322-328.
28.
LivetMBlanchardCSorensenTDMcClurgMR. An implementation system for medication optimization: operationalizing comprehensive medication management delivery in primary care. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018;1:14-20.
FlottorpSAOxmanADKrauseJ, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35.
32.
ProctorEKPowellBJMcMillenJC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.
33.
PowellBJWaltzTJChinmanMJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.
34.
LewisCCKlasnjaPPowellBJ, et al. From classification to causality: advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science. Front Public Health. 2018;6:136.
35.
ProctorESilmereHRaghavanR, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
StrausSEBrouwersMJohnsonD, et al; KT Canada Strategic Training Initiative in Health Research (STIHR). Core competencies in the science and practice of knowledge translation: description of a Canadian strategic training initiative. Implement Sci. 2011;6:127. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-127
38.
PadekMColditzGDobbinsM, et al. Developing educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts. Implement Sci. 2015;10:114. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0304-3
39.
MetzALouisonLWardCBurkeK. Global Implementation Specialist Practice Profile. Skills and Competencies for Implementation Practitioners. Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network and Centre for Effective Services; 2017.
BataldenPBDavidoffF. What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare?Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:2-3. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.022046
42.
KoczwaraBStoverAMDaviesL, et al. Harnessing the synergy between improvement science and implementation science in cancer: a call to action. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:335-340.
43.
Lane-FallMBFleisherLA. Quality improvement and implementation science: different fields with aligned goals. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018;36:xiii-xv.