The Whiskerbot project is a collaborative project between robotics engineers, computational neuroscientists and ethologists, aiming to build a biologically inspired robotic implementation of the rodent whisker sensory system. The morphology and mechanics of the large whiskers (macro-vibrissae) have been modeled, as have the neural structures that constitute the rodent central nervous system responsible for macro-vibrissae sensory processing. There are two principal motivations for this project. First, by implementing an artificial whisker sensory system controlled using biologically plausible neural networks we hope to test existing models more thoroughly and develop new hypotheses for vibrissal sensory processing. Second, the sensory mode of tactile whiskers could be useful for general mobile robotic sensory deployment. In this article the robotic platform that has been built is detailed as well as some of the experiments that have been conducted to test the neural control algorithms and architectures inspired from neuroethological observations to mediate adaptive behaviors.
Ahl, A. ( 1986). The role of vibrissae in behaviour: a status review. Veterinary Research Communications,10(4), 245— 268.
2.
Arvidsson, J., & Rice, F. (1991). Central projections of primary somatosensory neurons innervating different parts of the vibrissal skin on the mystacial pad of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 309, 1—16.
3.
Benedetti, F. (1995). Orienting behaviour and superior colliculus sensory representation in mice with the vibrissae bent into contralateral hemisphere . European Journal of Neurosceince,7, 1512—1519.
4.
Berg, R.W., & Kleinfeld, D. (2003). Rythmic whisking by rat: retraction as well as protraction of the vibrissae is under active muscular control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 104—117.
5.
Carvell, G., & Simons, D. (1990). Biometric analyses of vibrissale tactile discrimination in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 2638—2648.
6.
Dean, P., Redgrave, P., & Westby, G. (1989). Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends in Neuroscience, 12(4), 137—147.
7.
Di Scala, G., Schmitt, P., & Karli, P. (1983). Unilateral injection of GABA agonists in the superior colliculus: Assymmetry to tactile stimulation. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 19, 281—285.
8.
Ebara, S., Kumamoto, K., Matsuura, T., Mazurkiewicz, J., & Rice, F. (2002). Similarities and differences in the innervation of mystacial vibrissal follicle-sinus complexes in the rat and cat: a confocal microscopic study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 449, 103—119.
9.
Fend, M., Bovet, S., Yokoi, H., & Pfeifer, R. (2003). An active artificial whisker array for texture discrimination. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 1044—1049).
10.
Gurney, K., Prescott, T., & Redgrave, P. (2001). A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia I: A new functional anatomy. Biological Cybernetics , 84, 401— 410.
11.
Gustafson, J., & Felbain-Keramidas, S. (1977). Behavioural and neural approaches to the function of the mystacial vibrissae. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 477—488.
12.
Haidarliu, S., & Ahissar, E. (2001). Size gradients of barreloids in the rat thalamus . Journal of Comparative Neurology, 429, 372—387.
13.
Hartmann, M. (2001). Active sensing capabilities of the rat whisker system. Autonomous Robots,11, 249—254.
14.
Jacquin, M., Barcia, M., & Rhoades, R. (1989). Structure function relationships in rat brain stem subnucleus interpolaris (VI): Projection neurons. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 282, 45—62.
15.
Kaneko, M., Kanayama, N., & Tsuji, T. (1998). Active antenna for contact sensing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14, 278—291.
16.
Killackey, H., & Erzurumula, R. (2004). Trigeminal projections to the superior colliculus of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 201, 221—242.
17.
Krupa, D., Matell, M., Brisben, A., Oliveira, L., & Nicolelis, M. (2001). Behavioural properties of the trigeminal somatosensory system in rats performing whisker-dependent tactile discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 5752—5763.
18.
Ma, P. (1991). The barrelettes-architectonic vibrissal representations in the brainstem trigeminal complex of the mouse; a normal structural organization . Journal of Comparative Neurology, 309, 161—199.
19.
Milani, H., Steiner, H., & Huston, J. (1989). Analysis of recovery from behavioural asymmetries induced by unilateral removal of vibrissae in the rat. Behavioural Neuroscience, 103, 1067—1074
20.
Mitchinson, B., Gurney, K., Redgrave, P., Melhuish, C., Pipe, A., Pearson, M., et al. (2004). Empirically inspired simulated electro-mechanical model of the rat mystacial follicle-sinus complex. Proceedings of Royal Society London (B) Biological Science, 271, 2509—2516.
21.
Mitchinson, B., Pearson, M., Melhuish, C., & Prescott, T. (2006). A model of sensorimotor coordination in the rat whisker system. In S. Nol (Ed.) Animals to Animats 9: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour 4095 (pp. 77—88). Springer-Verlag.
22.
Nguyen, Q., & Kleinfeld, D. (2005). Positive feedback in a brainstem tactile sensorimotor loop. Neuron, 45, 447—457.
23.
Pearson, M., Gilhespy, I., Gurney, K., Melhuish, C., Mitchinson, B., Nibouche, M., et al. (2005). A real-time, FPGA based, biologically plausible neural network processor. In Articial neural networks: Formal models and their applications (Vol. 3697, pp. 1021—1026).
24.
Pearson, M., Gilhespy, I., Melhuish, C., Mitchinson, B., Nibouche, M., Pipe, A., et al. (2005). A biomimetic haptic sensor. International Journal of Advanced RoboticSystems, 2, 335—343.
25.
Prescott, T., Montes Gonzalez, F., Gurney, K., Humphries, M., & Redgrave, P. (2006). A robot model of the basal ganglia: behaviour and intrinsic processing. Neural Networks, 19, 31—61.
26.
Prescott, T., Redgrave, P., & Gurney, K. (1999). Layered control architectures in robots and vertebrates . Adaptive Behavior,7, 99—127.
27.
Redgrave, P., Prescott, T., & Gurney, K. (1999). The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem?Neuroscience, 89(4).
28.
Rice, F., Fundin, B., Pfaller, K., & Arvidsson, J. (1994). The innervation of the mystacial pad in adult rat studied by anterograde transport of HRP conjugates. Experimental Brain Research,99, 233—246.
29.
Sachdev, R., Berg, R., Champney, G., Kleinfeld, D., & Ebner, F. (2003). Unilateral vibrissa contact: Changes in amplitude but not timing of rythmic whisking. Somatosensory and Motor Research,20, 163—169.
30.
Seth, A., McKinstry, J., Edelman, G., & Krichmar , J. (2004). Active sensing of visual and tactile stimuli by brain-based devices. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 19(4).
31.
Solomon, J., & Hartmann, M. (2006). Robotic whiskers used to sense features. Nature, 443(5), 525.
32.
Szwed, M., Bagdasarian, K., & Ahissar, E. (2003). Encoding of vibrissal active touch. Neuron, 40, 621—630.
33.
Van der Loos, H. (1976). Barreloids in mouse somatosensory thalamus. Neuroscience Letters, 2, 1—6.
34.
Vincent, S. (1912). The function of the vibrissae in the behaviour in the white rat. Behavioural Monographs,1, 1—82.
35.
Welker, W. (1964). Analysis of sniffing of the albino rat. Behaviour, 22, 223—244.
36.
Wijaya, J., & Russell, R. (2002). Object exploration using whisker sensors. In Proceedings of the 2002 Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 180— 185).
37.
Woolsey, T., & Van der Loos, H. (1970, January). The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Research,17, 205—242.
