In a world with high demand for sustainable business practices, this paper investigates how workplace inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities can be accomplished through social partnerships. Drawing on social exchange theory and based on an explorative ethnographic case study of a partnership constellation aiming for workplace inclusion of an intellectually disabled workforce, the study explores how relational practices in social partnerships contribute to workplace inclusion of young people with intellectual disabilities. The study consists of two sub-studies focusing first on identification of the overall goals of the partnership collaboration in regard to workplace inclusion and, second, an investigation of how the goals are accomplished in the here and now of partnership collaboration. The findings are summarized in a conceptual framework that advocates a relational perspective on workplace inclusion and highlights relational practices between partnership participants as important drivers for workplace inclusion. The study advances knowledge on workplace inclusion by offering insights into how relational practices in social partnerships inform workplace inclusion. Furthermore, the findings help the individual social partnership partners effectively manage workplace inclusion by acknowledging relationship processes as fundamental elements of organizing for an inclusive workplace.
AlacovskaA.BucherE.FieselerC. (2022). A relational work perspective on the gig economy: Doing creative work on digital labour platforms. Work, Employment & Society, 38(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221103146
2.
AndreassenT. A.BreitE.SaltkjelT. (2020). Research approaches to networked employment services: A systematic review. Social Policy and Administration, 54(7), 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12597
3.
BarryB.CrantJ. M. (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11(6), 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.648.12537
4.
BlauM. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley.
5.
BriteR.NunesF.SouzaD. (2015). Labor inclusion of individuals with disabilities: Managers’ conceptions as a contributing factor. Work, 50(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141966
6.
BrymanA. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
7.
CaseyH.TrayerÁ.DesmondD.CoffeyL. (2023). Experiences and perceptions of everyday decision-making in the lives of adults with intellectual disabilities, their care partners and direct care support workers. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 17446295231189020, Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295231189020
8.
CavanaghJ.BartramT.MeachamH.BigbyC.OakmanJ.FosseyE. (2017). Supporting workers with disabilities: A scoping review of the role of human resource management in contemporary organisations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 6–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12111
9.
ChenC.TangN. (2022). How to include me: Incorporating impression management into the person-organization fit framework. Current Psychology, 41(6), 3374–3387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03169-w
10.
ColeM. S.SchaningerW. S.HarrisS. G. (2002). The workplace social exchange network: A multilevel, conceptual examination. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001008
11.
ConnellyC. E.BaldridgeD. (2018). Human relations virtual special issue: Workplace experiences of persons with disabilities. Human Relations, 71(9), 1288–1290.
12.
DobuschL. (2021). The inclusivity of inclusion approaches: A relational perspective on inclusion and exclusion in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(1), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12574
13.
ElrazH. (2018). Identity, mental health and work: How employees with mental health conditions recount stigma and the pejorative discourse of mental illness. Human Relations, 71(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717716752
14.
EngelsbergerA.BartramT.CavanaghJ.HalvorsenB.BogersM. (2023). The role of collaborative human resource management in supporting open innovation: A multi-level model. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), Article 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100942
GibbsG. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Sage.
17.
GondJ.-P.MoserC. (2021). Critical essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to “micro” corporate social responsibility. Human Relations, 74(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719864407
18.
GoodleyD. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
19.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
20.
GriepY.KraakJ. M.BeekmanE. M. (2023). Sustainability is dead, long live sustainability! Paving the way to include “the people” in sustainability. Group and Organization Management, 48(3), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221127107
21.
HaileG. A. (2022). Workplace disability and job satisfaction in britain: A co-worker test?Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(3), 1467–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X211014258
22.
HeinP.AnsariS. (2022). From sheltered to included: The emancipation of disabled workers from benevolent marginalization. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 749–783. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1689
23.
HepburnA.BoldenG. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In SidnellJ.StiversT. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
JammaersE.ZanoniP. (2021). The identity regulation of disabled employees: Unveiling the “varieties of ableism” in employers’ socio-ideological control. Organization Studies, 42(3), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619900292
25.
JammaersE.ZanoniP.HardonkS. (2016). Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations, 69(6), 1365–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715612901
26.
JhaI. N.PalD.SarkarS. (2023). Embracing diversity and igniting excellence: Unveiling the impact of workplace inclusion on organizational outcomes in the Indian IT sector. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2289481
27.
KappelidesP.SpoorJ. (2019). Managing sport volunteers with a disability: Human resource management implications. Sport Management Review, 22(5), 694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.10.004
28.
KhanM. H.GrabarskiM. K.AliM.BuckmasterS. (2023). Insights into creating and managing an inclusive neurodiverse workplace for positive outcomes: A multistaged theoretical framework. Group and Organization Management, 48(5), 1339–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221133583
29.
KolkA.van DolenW.VockM. (2010). Trickle effects of cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(S1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0783-3
30.
KourulaA.MoonJ.Salles-DjelicM.-L.WickertC. (2019). New roles of government in the governance of business conduct: Implications for management and organizational research. Organization Studies, 40(8), 1101–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619852142
31.
LindströmJ. (Ed.), (2021). Intersubjectivity in action: Studies in language and social interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
32.
LiuY.SaralaR. M.XingY.CooperS. C. L. (2017). Human side of collaborative partnerships: A microfoundational perspective. Group and Organization Management, 42(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2017.03.009
33.
Mik-MeyerN. (2016). Othering, ableism and disability: A discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Human Relations, 69(6), 1341–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715618454
34.
MorgansonV. J.MajorD. A.ObornK. L.VeriveJ. M.HeelanM. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011056941
35.
PacheA. C.FayardA. L.GaloM. (2022). How can cross-sector collaborations foster social innovation? A review. Issues in Business Ethics, 62, 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96596-9_3
36.
PedersenI.DalskauL. H.IhlebC.PatilG. (2015). Content and key components of vocational rehabilitation on care farms for unemployed people with mental health problems: A case study report. Work, 53(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152212
37.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
38.
RandelA. E. (2023). Inclusion in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Group and Organization Management, Epub ahead of print, Article 105960112311755. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231175578
39.
ReissnerS.PaganV. (2013). Generating employee engagement in a public-private partnership: Management communication activities and employee experiences. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2741–2759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.765497
40.
RichardS.LemaireC.Church-MorelA. (2021). Beyond identity consciousness: Human resource management practices and mental health conditions in sheltered workshops. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(15), 3218–3243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1893787
SchaffernichtS. K.ModerK.QuendlerE. (2021). Evaluation of a profile comparison system for the inclusion of people with disabilities in horticulture: A case study in Austria. Work, 68(2), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203389
43.
ScottR. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
44.
SeitanidiM. M.CraneA. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(S2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9743-y
45.
SelskyJ. W.ParkerB. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(S1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2
46.
ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.Holcombe EhrhartK.SinghG. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
47.
SidnellJ.StiversT. (Eds.), (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
48.
SlackR. E.CorlettS.MorrisR. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2057-3
49.
SmetsM.JarzabkowskiP. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712471407
50.
SyedJ.ÖzbilginM. (2009). A relational framework for international transfer of diversity management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2435–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903363755
51.
WaddockS. A. (1989). Understanding social partnerships: An evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 21(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978902100105
52.
WilkinsonR. (2019). Atypical interaction: Conversation analysis and communicative impairments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045
53.
WilliamL.CunninghamI. (2021). Evaluating the role of trade unions and civil society organisations in supporting graduate educated disabled workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(3), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X18799899
54.
ZadekS. (2017). Partnership alchemy: Engagement, innovation and governance. In AndriofJ.McIntoshM. (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 200–214). Routledge.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
