In this essay we discuss the issue of counting: the process of assigning numbers to data that are in nonnumerical form. We review why counting is a controversial issue in qualitative research, and explain how this controversy creates what we call the “multiple audience problem” for qualitative researchers. We then identify the purposes that can be served by four different types of counting, explore when counting should be avoided entirely, and discuss when the results of counting should be concealed, or as Sutton put it, kept in the closet.
Agrillo, C., Dadda, M., Serena, G., & Bisazza, A. ( 2009). Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE, 4, e4786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone .0004786
2.
Alvesson, M. ( 2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13-33.
3.
Amis, J.M., & Silk, M.L. ( 2008). The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 456-480.
4.
Ashforth, B. ( 2005). Becoming vanilla pudding: How we undermine our passion for research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 400-403.
5.
Ashforth, B., Kreiner, G.E., Clark, M.A., & Fugate, M. ( 2007). Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 149-174.
6.
Barley, S.R. ( 1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments . Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108.
7.
Barley, S.R. ( 1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1, 220-247.
8.
Barley, S.R. ( 2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16-20.
9.
Bartunek, J.M., & Seo, M. ( 2002). Qualitative research can add new meanings to quantitative research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 237-242.
10.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago : Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
11.
Corley, K.G., & Gioia, D.A. ( 2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173-208.
12.
Denison, D.R., & Mishra, A.K. ( 1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness . Organization Science, 6, 204-223.
13.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., & Lawrence, K.A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal , 44, 716-736.
14.
Easterby-Smith, M., Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. ( 2008). Working with pluralism: Determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 419-429.
15.
Fineman, S., & Mangham, I. ( 1983). Data, meanings and creativity: A preface. Journal of Management Studies, 20, 295-300.
16.
Gephart, R.P., Jr. ( 2004). From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.
17.
Gherardi, S., & Turner, B. ( 1987). Real Men Don’t Collect Soft Data. Quaderno13, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, Universita di Trento.
18.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. ( 1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic tests convince. Organization Science, 4, 595-616.
19.
Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. ( 2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755-778.
20.
Jick, T.D. ( 1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
21.
Lee, T.W. ( 1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K., & Feldman, M.S. ( 2008). Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19, 907-981.
23.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T.B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657-679.
24.
Maitlis, S. ( 2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21-49.
Pfeffer, J. ( 1995). Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science, 6, 681-686.
29.
Pratt, M.G. ( 2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top NorthAmerican Journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481-509.
30.
Pratt, M.G. ( 2009). For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal , 52, 856-862.
31.
Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. ( 2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 977-998.
32.
Silverman, D. ( 2000). Doing qualitative research. London : SAGE. Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
Suddaby, R. ( 2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
34.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. ( 2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
35.
Suttles, G.D. ( 1978). The social order of the slum. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
36.
Sutton, R.I. ( 1997). The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organization Science, 8, 97-106.
37.
Symon, G., Buehring, A., Johnson, P., & Cassell, C. ( 2008). Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labour process. Organization Studies, 29, 1315-1336.
