This study examines whether and when humble CEOs lead firms that behave more entrepreneurially. Guided by upper-echelons theory, we link CEO humility with corporate entrepreneurship, considering two specific discretionary sources in the firm’s task environment—market turbulence and market complexity—as moderators. We test our hypotheses using multi-source data from small Indian firms. We find that the association between CEO humility and corporate entrepreneurship is positive and significant, strengthening at higher levels of humility. Systematic post hoc analyses yield evidence for the moderating influence of market turbulence and complexity. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
AguinisH.RamaniR. S.AlabduljaderN. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0011
2.
AikenL. S.WestS.G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
3.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
4.
AndersonB. S.EshimaY. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.001
5.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
6.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WalumbwaF. O.LuthansF.MayD. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
BharanitharanK.ChenZ. X.BahmanniaS.LoweK. B. (2019). Is leader humility a friend or foe, or both? An attachment theory lens on leader humility and its contradictory outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3925-z
10.
BolingJ. R.PieperT. M.CovinJ. G. (2016). CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12150
11.
BoscoF. A.AguinisH.FieldJ. G.PierceC. A.DaltonD. R. (2016). HARKing's threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta‐analytic sources. Personnel Psychology, 69(3), 709–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12111
BoydB.K.GoveS. (2006), “Managerial Constraint: The Intersection Between Organizational Task Environment and Discretion”. In KetchenD.J.BerghD.D., (Eds.) Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (pp. 57–95). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-8387
CaoQ.SimsekZ.JansenJ. J. (2015). CEO social capital and entrepreneurial orientation of the firm: Bonding and bridging effects. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1957–1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312469666
17.
CastrogiovanniG. J. (2002). Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time?Journal of Management, 28(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800201
18.
ChandlerJ. A.PetrenkoO. V.HayesN.BlakeA. B.AimeF. (2022). Do the personal attributes of CEOs matter in the IPO pricing process? An examination of charisma and humility. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1451
19.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
20.
ChenJ.NadkarniS. (2017). It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216663504
21.
ChenJ.SimsekZ.LiaoY.KwanH. K. (2022). CEO self-monitoring and corporate entrepreneurship: a moderated mediation model of the CEO-TMT interface. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2197–2222. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211048436
22.
ChinM. K.ZhangS. X.JahanshahiA. A.NadkarniS. (2021). Unpacking political ideology: CEO social and economic ideologies, strategic decision-making processes, and corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1213–1235. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1228
23.
ConnellyB. L.IrelandR. D.ReutzelC. R.CoombsJ. E. (2010). The power and effects of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00316.x
24.
ConnerK. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm?Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700109
25.
Cortes-MejiaS.CortesA. F.HerrmannP. (2022). Sharing strategic decisions: CEO humility, TMT decentralization, and ethical culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04766-8
26.
CovinJ. G.SlevinD. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
27.
CragunO. R.OlsenK. J.WrightP. M. (2020). Making CEO narcissism research great: A review and meta-analysis of CEO narcissism. Journal of Management, 46(6), 908–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319892678
28.
CruzK. S. (2022). Are you asking the correct person (Hint: Oftentimes you are not!)? Stop worrying about unfounded common method bias arguments and start using my guide to make better decisions of when to use self-and other-reports. Group & Organization Management, 47(5), 920–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221103068
29.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277657
30.
DavidssonP.GordonS. R. (2016). Much ado about nothing? The surprising persistence of nascent entrepreneurs through macroeconomic crisis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 915–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12152
31.
DavisG. F. (2015). Editorial essay: What is organizational research for?Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215585725
32.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
33.
De ClercqD.DimovD.ThongpapanlN. T. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.004
34.
De ClercqD.ThongpapanlN.VoronovM. (2018). Sustainability in the face of institutional adversity: Market turbulence, network embeddedness, and innovative orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3004-7
35.
DebP.WiklundJ. (2017). The effects of CEO founder status and stock ownership on entrepreneurial orientation in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 32–55.
36.
DessG. G.BeardD. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
37.
DessG. G.LumpkinG. T. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.15841975
38.
DewN.VelamuriS. R.VenkataramanS. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.004
39.
Easterby-SmithM.ThorpeR.JacksonP. R. (2012). Management Research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Sage.
40.
EchambadiR.HessJ. D. (2007). Mean-centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models. Marketing Science, 26(3), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0263
41.
EisenhardtK. M.BourgeoisL. J.III (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770. https://doi.org/10.5465/256337
42.
EngelenA.GuptaV. K.StrengerL.BrettelM. (2015a). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm performance, and the moderating role of transformational leadership behaviors. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1069–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455244
43.
EngelenA.KubeH.SchmidtS.FlattenT. C. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(8), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.002
44.
EngelenA.NeumannC.SchmidtS. (2016). Should entrepreneurially oriented firms have narcissistic CEOs?Journal of Management, 42(3), 698–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495413
45.
EngelenA.NeumannC.SchwensC. (2015b). Of Course I Can”: The effect of CEO overconfidence on entrepreneurially oriented firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1137–1160. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12099
46.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
47.
FergusonP.R.FergusonG.J. (1994). The structure-conduct-performance paradigm. In Industrial Economics (pp. 13–37). London, UK: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23306-9_2
48.
FinkelsteinS.BoydB. K. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-01-2015-0004
49.
FinkelsteinS.HambrickD. C.CannellaA. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162073.001.0001
50.
Gansen-AmmannD. N.MeursJ. A.WihlerA.BlickleG. (2019). Political skill and manager performance: Exponential and asymptotic relationships due to differing levels of enterprising job demand. Group & Organization Management, 44(4), 718–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117747487
51.
GardnerR. G.HarrisT. B.LiN.KirkmanB. L.MathieuJ. E. (2017). Understanding “it depends” in organizational research: A theory-based taxonomy, review, and future research agenda concerning interactive and quadratic relationships. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 610–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117708856
52.
GinsbergA.VenkatramanN. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278950
53.
GlinyanovaM.BounckenR. B.TiberiusV.BallesterA. C. C. (2021). Five decades of corporate entrepreneurship research: measuring and mapping the field. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4), 1731–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00711-9
54.
GuptaV. K.BatraS. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Indian SMEs: Universal and contingency perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 660–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615577708
55.
GuptaV. K.GuptaA. (2015). The concept of entrepreneurial orientation. Frontiers and Trends in Entrepreneurship Research, 11(2), 55–137.
56.
GuptaV.K.MortalS. C.YangT. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm value: Does managerial discretion play a role?Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0210-3
57.
GuptaN.ShawJ. D.DeleryJ. E. (2000). Correlates of response outcomes among organizational key informants. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810034002
HambrickD. C.AbrahamsonE. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multimethod approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1427–1441. https://doi.org/10.5465/256864
62.
HambrickD. C.FinkelsteinS. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
63.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons organization as a reflection of its managers. Academy Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
64.
HambrickD. C.QuigleyT. J. (2014). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2108
65.
HaytonJ. C.KelleyD. J. (2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resources Management, 45(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20118
66.
HeaveyC.SimsekZ. (2013). Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12033
67.
HerrmannP.NadkarniS. (2014). Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1318–1342. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2156
68.
HollenbeckJ. R.WrightP. M. (2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487
69.
HuJ.ErdoganB.JiangK.BauerT. N.LiuS. (2018). Leader humility and team creativity: the role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 313. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000277
70.
HughesM.MustafaM. (2017). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business Management, 55, 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12269
71.
HutzschenreuterT.KleindienstI.LangeS. (2014). Added psychic distance stimuli and MNE performance: Performance effects of added cultural, governance, geographic, and economic distance in MNEs' international expansion. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.003
72.
IrelandR. D.CovinJ. G.KuratkoD. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x
73.
JenningsD. F.LumpkinJ. R. (1989). Functioning modeling corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical integrative analysis. Journal of Management, 15(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500310
74.
KarimS. (2009). Business unit reorganization and innovation in new product markets. Management Science, 55(7), 1237–1254. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1017
75.
KarimS.CarrollT. N.LongC. P. (2016). Delaying change: Examining how industry and managerial turbulence impact structural realignment. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 791–817. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0409
KehH. T.NguyenT. T. M.NgH. P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.003
78.
KelemenT. K.MatthewsS. H.MatthewsM. J.HenryS. E. (2022). Humble leadership: A review and synthesis of leader expressed humility. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2608
79.
KennyD. A.KaniskanB.McCoachD. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
KetchenD.BoydB. K.BerghD. D. (2008). Research methods in strategic management: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108319843
82.
KickulJ.GriffithsM.BacqS.GarudN. (2018). Catalyzing social innovation: is entrepreneurial bricolage always good?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1413771
KluemperD. H.McLartyB. D.BingM. N. (2015). Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 237. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0037810
85.
KumarK.SubramanianR.YaugerC. (1998). Examining the market orientation-performance relationship: a context-specific study. Journal of Management, 24(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80060-9
86.
KuratkoD. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor's perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130040201
KuratkoD. F.AudretschD. B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
89.
KuratkoD. F.CovinJ. G. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship: A research perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.311.
90.
KuratkoD. F.MorrisM. H.SchindehutteM. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9627-3
91.
LandisR. S.DunlapW. P. (2000). Moderated multiple regression tests are criterion specific. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810033003
92.
LernerM.ZahraS. A.KohaviY. G. (2007). Time and corporate entrepreneurship. In LumpkinG.T.KatzJ.A. (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm emergence and Growth (pp. 187–221). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(07)10008-8
93.
LindJ. T.MehlumH. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U‐shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
94.
LingY. A. N.SimsekZ.LubatkinM. H.VeigaJ. F. (2008a). The impact of transformational CEOs on the performance of small-to medium-sized firms: Does organizational context matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 923–934. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.923
95.
LingY. A. N.SimsekZ.LubatkinM. H.VeigaJ. F. (2008b). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32626023
96.
LiuS.Lucy LiuX.WangH.WangY. (2021). Humble leader behavior and its effects on performance at the team and individual level: A multi-perspective study. Group & Organization Management, 47(5), 1008–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211024429
97.
LubatkinM. H.SimsekZ.LingY.VeigaJ. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
98.
MasonC.BrownR. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9369-9
McLartyB. D.WhitmanD. S.KluemperD. H.TaoS. (2022). An identity and reputation approach to understanding the Dark Triad in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(3), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2569
101.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
102.
MillerD. (2015). A downside to the entrepreneurial personality?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12130
103.
MillerJ. D.McCainJ.LynamD. R.FewL. R.GentileB.MacKillopJ.CampbellW. K. (2014). A comparison of the criterion validity of popular measures of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder via the use of expert ratings. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 958–969. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036613
104.
MintzbergH. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164491
MorrisM.SchindehutteM.AllenJ. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
107.
NadkarniS.HerrmannP. O. L. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196
108.
NeelyB. H.JrLovelaceJ. B.CowenA. P.HillerN. J. (2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640
109.
NielsenR.MarroneJ. A. (2018). Humility: Our current understanding of the construct and its role in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12160
110.
NielsenR.MarroneJ. A.SlayH. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350892
111.
NieX.YuM.ZhaiY.LinH. (2022). Explorative and exploitative innovation: A perspective on CEO humility, narcissism, and market dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 147, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.061
112.
O’BoyleE. H.JrBanksG. C.Gonzalez-MuléE. (2017). The chrysalis effect: How ugly initial results metamorphosize into beautiful articles. Journal of Management, 43(2), 376–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527133
113.
OcB.BashshurM. R.DanielsM. A.GregurasG. J.DiefendorffJ. M. (2015). Leader humility in Singapore. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.11.005
114.
OuA. Y.WaldmanD. A.PetersonS. J. (2018). Do humble CEOs matter? An examination of CEO humility and firm outcomes. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1147–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315604187
115.
OwensB.P.HekmanD. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0441
116.
OwensB. P.HekmanD. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1088–1111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0660
117.
OwensB. P.JohnsonM. D.MitchellT. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
118.
OwensB. P.WallaceA. S.WaldmanD. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: the counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1203–1213. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0038698
119.
PatersonT. A.HarmsP. D.SteelP.CredéM. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321
120.
PetersonS. J.GalvinB. M.LangeD. (2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01253.x
121.
PetrenkoO. V.AimeF.RecendesT.ChandlerJ. A. (2019). The case for humble expectations: CEO humility and market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 1938–1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3071
PirhadiH.FeyzbakhshA. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship, its antecedents, process, and consequences: A systematic review and suggestion for future research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 196–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00294-8
124.
PittinoD.VisintinF.LautoG. (2017). A configurational analysis of the antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation. European Management Journal, 35(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.07.003
125.
PorterS. L.RambachanA.de CeaA. V.RabinowitzD.PardueS.JacksonS. (2016). Religious perspectives on humility. In WorthingtonE. L.Jr.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (Eds.), Handbook of humility: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 47–61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660462
126.
RauchA.WiklundJ.LumpkinG. T.FreseM. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x
127.
RegoA.OwensB.LealS.MeloA. I.e CunhaM. P.GonçalvesL.RibeiroP. (2017). How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: A moderated mediation model. Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.002
128.
RegoA.OwensB.YamK. C.BluhmD.CunhaM. P. E.SilardA.LiuW. (2019). Leader humility and team performance: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1009–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316688941
129.
RuizL. E.AmorósJ. E.GuerreroM. (2022). Does gender matter for corporate entrepreneurship? A cross-countries study. Small Business Economics, 1, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00617-6
130.
SamimiM.CortesA. F.AndersonM. H.HerrmannP. (2022). What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101353.
131.
ScharffsB. (1998). The role of humility in exercising practical wisdom (32, pp. 127–199). University of California Davis Law Review.
132.
SchilkeO.CookK. S. (2015). Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2208
133.
SeidlerJ. (1974). On using informants: A technique for collecting quantitative data and controlling measurement error in organization analysis. American Sociological Review, 39(6), 816–831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094155
134.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300302
135.
SiggelkowN.RivkinJ. W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science, 16(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0116
136.
SimbaA.ThaiM. T. T. (2019). Advancing entrepreneurial leadership as a practice in MSME management and development. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(S2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12481
137.
SimsekZ.HeaveyC.VeigaJ. J. F. (2010). The impact of CEO core self‐evaluation on the firm's entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.800
138.
StamW.ElfringT. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30744031
139.
SunD.ZengS.LinH.YuM.WangL. (2021). Is green the virtue of humility? The influence of humble CEOs on corporate green innovation in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3106952
140.
SutcliffeK. M.HuberG. P. (1998). Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 793–807.
141.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996). Multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
142.
TangneyJ. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.70
143.
TangY.QianC.ChenG.ShenR. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir) responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1338–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2286
144.
TangJ.TangZ.MarinoL. D.ZhangY.LiQ. (2008). Exploring an inverted U–shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00223.x
145.
TengB. S. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00645.x
146.
TrumppC.GuentherT. (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49–68.
147.
TsuiA. S. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166121
148.
UotilaJ.MaulaM.KeilT.ZahraS. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.738
149.
UrbanoD.TurroA.WrightM.ZahraS. (2022). Corporate entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 59(4), 1541–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00590-6
VeraD.BonardiJ. P.HittM. A.WithersM. C. (2022). Extending the boundaries of strategic leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101617
152.
VeraD.Rodriguez-LopezA. (2004). Strategic virtues: Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 393–408.
153.
WadeJ. B.PoracJ. F.PollockT. G.GraffinS. D. (2006). The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083021
154.
WalesW. J.GuptaV. K.MousaF. T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611418261
155.
WalesW. J.ParidaV.PatelP. C. (2013a). Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2026
156.
WalesW. J.PatelP. C.LumpkinG. T. (2013b). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12034
157.
WangrowD. B.SchepkerD. J.BarkerV. L.III (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214
158.
WeickK. E. (2001). Leadership as the legitimation of doubt. In BennisW.SpreitzerG. M.CummingsT. G. (Eds.), The future of leadership: Today’s top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow’s leaders (pp. 91–102). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
159.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
160.
WelterF.BakerT. (2021). Moving contexts onto new roads: Clues from other disciplines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1154–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720930996
161.
WelterF.BakerT.WirschingK. (2019). Three waves and counting: The rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 52, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0094-5
162.
WhiteJ. V.BorgholthausC. J. (2022). Who’s in charge here? A bibliometric analysis of upper echelons research. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.028
163.
WiklundJ.ShepherdD. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
164.
WuJ.ChenX. (2014). Home country institutional environments and foreign expansion of emerging market firms. International Business Review, 23(5), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.01.004
165.
YamakS.NielsenS.Escribá-EsteveA. (2014). The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 69–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113511663
ZahraS. A.CovinJ. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
168.
ZahraS. A.FilatotchevI.WrightM. (2009). How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.09.001
169.
ZahraS. A.NeubaumD. O.HuseM. (1997). The effect of the environment on export performance among telecommunications new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879702200102
ZahraS. A.WrightM.AbdelgawadS. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807
172.
ZhangT.AcsZ. (2018). Age and entrepreneurship: nuances from entrepreneur types and generation effects. Small Business Economics, 51(4), 773–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0079-4
173.
ZhangH.OuA. Y.TsuiA. S.WangH. (2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003
