The Role of Shared Mental Model Development in Understanding Virtual Team Effectiveness

Abstract

In this article we develop a conceptual framework that examines the relationship between shared mental models, task interdependence, and virtual team performance. In addition, we use media synchronicity theory to examine how various attributes of the technologies used by virtual teams to communicate can influence the development of shared mental models. Finally, we employ a sense-making lens to explore in more detail how features inherent to different communication technologies influence the development of shared mental models. Our goal is that through examining these relationships, some of the mixed findings in prior virtual team research may be better explained.

Keywords

shared mental models teams information communication technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahuja

M. K.

Galvin

J. E.

(2003). Socialization in virtual groups. Journal of Management, 29, 161-185.

Algesheimer

Dholakia

U. M.

Gurau

(2011). Virtual team performance in a highly competitive environment. Group & Organization Management, 36, 161-190.

Athans

(1982, September). The expert team of experts approach to command and control (C2) organizations. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2(3), 30-38.

Becker-Beck

Wintermantel

Borg

(2005). Principles of regulating interaction in teams practicing face-to-face communication versus teams practicing computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 36, 499-536.

Berente

Hansen

Pike

J. C.

Bateman

P. J.

(2011). Arguing the value of virtual worlds: Patterns of discursive sensemaking of an innovative technology. MIS Quarterly, 35, 685-709.

Bergiel

B. J.

Bergiel

E. B.

Balsmeier

P. W.

(2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31(2), 99-110.

Birz

(2007). Statewide, real-time resource management aids during emergencies. Retrieved from http://www.nursezone.com/nursing-news-events/devices-and-technology/Statewide-Real-time-Resource-Management-Aids-During-Emergencies_24022.aspx

Bosch-Sijtsema

P. M.

Fruchter

Vartiainen

Ruohomaki

(2011). A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36, 275-307.

Brockmann

E. N.

Anthony

W. P.

(2002). Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group & Organization Management, 27, 436-455.

10.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

(1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami.

11.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

Converse

(1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Castellan

J. J.

(Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

12.

Carley

K. M.

(1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533-558.

13.

Cheshina

Rafaelia

Bos

(2011). Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2-16.

14.

Chidambaram

(1996). Rational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-165.

15.

Cohen

S. G.

Bailey

D. E.

(1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.

16.

Cooke

N. J.

Kiekel

P. A.

Salas

Stout

Bowers

Cannon-Bowers

(2003). Measuring team knowledge: A window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 179-199.

17.

Cramton

C. D.

(2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371.

18.

Cramton

C. D.

(2002). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 356-367.

19.

Curseu

P. L.

Schalk

Wessel

(2008). How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 628-652.

20.

Daft

R. L.

Lengel

R. H.

(1986). Organization information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.

21.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

(2010a). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32-53.

22.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

(2010b). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 1-14.

23.

Dennis

A. R.

Valacich

J. S.

(1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui, HI.

24.

Dennis

A. R.

Valacich

J. S.

Fuller

R. M.

(2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 575-600.

25.

Duranti

C. M.

de Almeida

F. C.

(2012). Is more technology better for communication in international virtual teams? International Journal of e-Collaboration, 8(1), 36-52.

26.

Elliott

MacPherson

(2010). Policy and practice: Recursive learning from crisis. Group & Organization Management, 35, 572-605.

27.

Espinosa

Slaughter

Kraut

R. E.

Herbsleb

(2007). Familiarity and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18, 613-630.

28.

Forgas

(1981). Social episodes and group milieu: A study in social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 77-87.

29.

Gersick

(1988). Time and transition in work teams: Towards a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.

30.

Griffith

T. L.

Sawyer

J. E.

Neale

M. A.

(2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.

31.

Gully

(2000). Work teams research: Recent findings and future trends. In Beyerlein

M. M.

(Ed.), Work teams: Past, present and future (pp. 25-44). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

32.

Gupta

Mattarelli

Seshasai

Broschak

(2009). Use of collaborative technologies and knowledge sharing in co-located and distributed teams: Towards the 24-h knowledge factory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18, 147-161.

33.

Hiltz

S. R.

Johnson

Turoff

(1986). Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.

34.

Hollingshead

A. B.

(2001). Computer-mediated communication, the Internet, and group research. In Hogg

Tindale

R. S.

(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3 Group Processes, pp. 557-573). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

35.

Hollingshead

A. B.

McGrath

J. E.

(1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In Guzzo

R. A.

Salas

(Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Houghton

S. M.

Simon

Aquino

Goldberg

C. B.

(2000). No safety in numbers: Persistence of biases and their effects on team risk perception and team decision making. Group & Organization Management, 25, 325-353.

37.

Jarvenpaa

S. L.

Leidner

D. E.

(1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.

38.

Johnson-Laird

(1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

39.

Kauppila

O. P.

Rajala

Jyrama

(2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42, 395-418.

40.

Kiesler

Siegel

McGuire

T. W.

(1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.

41.

Kirkman

B. L.

Mathieu

J. E.

(2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700-718.

42.

Klimoski

Mohammed

(1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.

43.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Bell

B. S.

(2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman

W. C.

Ilgen

D. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

44.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Gully

S. M.

Nason

E. R.

Smith

E. M.

(1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In Ilgen

D. R.

Pulakos

E. D.

(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240-292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

45.

Kraiger

Wenzel

L. H.

(1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In Brannick

M. T.

Salas

Prince

(Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods and applications (pp. 63-84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

46.

Levesque

L. L.

Wilson

J. M.

Wholey

D. R.

(2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 135-144.

47.

Lewis

Herndon

(2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22, 1254-1265.

48.

Lin

C. P.

(2010). Learning task effectiveness and social interdependence through the mediating mechanisms of sharing and helping: A survey of online knowledge workers. Group & Organization Management, 35, 299-328.

49.

Majchrzak

Malhotra

Stamps

Lipnack

(2004). Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Business Review, 82(1), 131-138.

50.

Majchrzak

Rice

R. E.

Malhotra

King

(2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569-600.

51.

Marks

M. A.

Sabella

M. J.

Burke

C. S.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.

52.

Martins

L. L.

Gilson

L. L.

Maynard

M. T.

(2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.

53.

Mathieu

J. E.

Heffner

T. S.

Goodwin

G. F.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

(2004). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-20.

54.

Mathieu

J. E.

Heffner

T. S.

Goodwin

G. F.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.

55.

Mathieu

J. E.

Maynard

M. T.

Rapp

T. L.

Gilson

L. L.

(2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.

56.

Mathieu

J. E.

Maynard

M. T.

Rapp

T. L.

Mangos

P. M.

(2010). Interactive effects of team/task shared mental models as related to air traffic controllers’ teamwork. Human Performance, 23, 22-40.

57.

Matyszczyk

(May 11, 2012). Britain’s prime minister thought LOL meant “lots of love?” So what? CNET News. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57432473-71/britains-prime-minister-thought-lol-meant-lots-of-love-so-what/

58.

Maynard

M. T.

Mathieu

J. E.

Rapp

T. L.

Gilson

L. L.

(2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 342-365.

59.

Mohammed

Ferzandi

Hamilton

(2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876-910.

60.

Montoya

M. M.

Massey

A. P.

Lockwood

N. S.

(2011). 3D collaborative virtual environments: Exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sciences, 42, 451-476.

61.

Niinimaki

Piri

Lassenius

Paasivaara

(2012). Reflecting the choice and usage of communication tools in global software development projects with media synchronicity theory. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 24, 677-692.

62.

Peters

Karren

R. J.

(2009). An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479-504.

63.

Rana

A. R.

Turoff

Hiltz

S. R.

(1997). Task and technology interaction (TTI): A theory of technological support for group tasks. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.

64.

Rentsch

J. R.

Klimoski

(2001). Why do “great minds” think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 107-120.

65.

Rice

R. E.

(1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 65-94.

66.

Rice

R. E.

(1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484.

67.

Rouse

Morris

(1986). On looking into the black box: The prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.

68.

Saint Agnes Hospital Announces Expansion of Chest Pain Emergency Department to Expedite Treatment for Cardiac Patients. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.stagnes.org/index.php/newsroom/news-releases/saint-agnes-hospital-announces-expansion-of-chest-pain-emergency/

69.

Saavedra

Earley

P. C.

Van Dyne

(1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.

70.

Salas

Burke

C. S.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2002). What we know about designing and delivering team training. In Kraiger

(Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice (pp. 234-259). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

71.

Siegel

Dubrovsky

Kiesler

McGuire

(1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.

72.

Simpson

(2005). Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 337-361.

73.

Smith-Jentsch

K. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Kraiger

(2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 523-535.

74.

Sproull

R. F.

(1991). A lesson in electronic mail. In Sproull

Kiesler

(Eds.), Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization (pp. 177-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

75.

Staples

D. S.

Webster

(2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617-640.

76.

Steizela

Rimbau-Gilabert

(2013). Upward influence tactics through technology-mediated communication tools. Computers in Human, 29, 462-472.

77.

Te’eni

(2001). Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25, 251-312.

78.

Thatcher

S. M. B.

Brown

S. A.

Jenkins

J. L.

(2012). E-collaboration media use and diversity perceptions: An evolutionary perspective of virtual organizations. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 8(2), 28-46.

79.

Thompson

J. D.

(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

80.

Tuckman

(1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.

81.

Valacich

J. S.

Paranka

George

J. F.

Nunamaker

J. F.

Jr. (1993). Communication parallelism and the new media: A new dimension for media richness. Communication Research, 20, 249-276.

82.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Delbecq

A. L.

Koenig

(1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-338.

83.

Wageman

Gardner

Mortensen

(2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for team research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 301-315.

84.

Walther

J. B.

(2009). Computer-mediated communication and virtual groups: Applications to interethnic conflict. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 225-238.

85.

Walther

J. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

(1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.

86.

Weaver

S. J.

Salas

King

H. B.

(2011). Twelve best practices for team training evaluation in health care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 37, 341-349.

87.

Wegner

D. M.

(1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen

Goethals

G. R.

(Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205).New York: Springer-Verlag.

88.

Weick

K. E.

(1985). Cosmos vs. chaos: Sense and nonsense in electronic contexts. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 50-64.

89.

Weick

K. E.

(1993). Collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.

90.

Wildman

J. L.

Shuffler

M. L.

Lazzara

E. H.

Fiore

S. M.

Burke

C. S.

Salas

Garven

(2012). Trust development in swift starting action teams: A multilevel framework. Group & Organization Management, 37, 137-170.

91.

Yates

Paquette

(2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6-13.

92.

Zigurs

(2000). A theory of task-technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 313-334.

93.

Zmud

R. W.

Lind

M. R.

Young

F. W.

(1990). An attribute space for organizational communication channels. Information Systems Journal, 1, 440-457.