As virtual teams become increasingly prevalent in today’s globalized and technology-driven environments, shared mental models (SMMs) are crucial for enhancing collaboration and performance. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature (2004–2023) to understand how SMMs have been investigated in virtual settings and methods for measuring them. Studies were coded based on information and communication technology (ICT) tools, team characteristics, types of SMMs, and the Input-Process-Output (I-P-O) framework. Findings show diverse SMMs impact team functioning, but measurement methods lack standardization, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. This study underscores gaps in the literature and suggests avenues for future exploration.
AndresH. P. (2011). Shared mental model development during technology-mediated collaboration. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7(3), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2011070102
2.
BerryG. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. The Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610397270
3.
BolstadC.SchneiderM.GrahamJ.GonzalezC. (2004). Collaborative tools and shared mental models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(3), 610–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404800371
4.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, 221, 221–246.
5.
DeChurchL. A.Mesmer-MagnusJ. R. (2010). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(1), 1.
6.
EntinE. E.SerfatyD. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41(2), 312–325.
7.
EspevikR.JohnsenB. H.EidJ. (2011). Communication and performance in co-located and distributed teams: An issue of shared mental models of team members?Military Psychology, 23(6), 616–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2011.616792
8.
FeldmanM.LumH. C.SimsV. K.Smith-JentschK.LagattutaN. (2008). Do you see what I see? Eye tracking and shared mental models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52(19), 1579–1583. http://doi.org/10.1177/154193120805201958
9.
GershgorenL.BasevitchI.SchinkeR.TenenbaumG. (2014). Peer leadership and shared mental models in a college volleyball team: A season long case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 8(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0021
10.
GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T.Jones YoungN. C.VartiainenM.HakonenM. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
11.
HannaN.RichardsD. (2015, May 4–8). The impact of virtual agent personality on a shared mental model with humans during collaboration. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 1777–1778). Istanbul, Turkey, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS).
12.
HerriottH. L.McNultyM. A. (2022). Virtual learning impacts communication and teamwork. The Clinical Teacher, 19(5), e13514. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13514
13.
JohnsenB. H.BrattebøG.EspevikR.HystadS. W.ØsteråsØ.VatsøyL.EidJ. (2022). The effect of complexity of ambulance missions on shared mental models in virtual teams. Emergency Medicine Open Journal, 8(1), 25–31. http://doi.org/10.17140/EMOJ-8-165
14.
JohnsonT. E.LeeY.LeeM.O’ConnorD. L.KhalilM. K.HuangX. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860701723802
15.
JohnsonT. E.O’ConnorD. L. (2008). Measuring team shared understanding using the analysis-constructed shared mental model methodology. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20034
16.
JohnsonT. E.TopE.YukselturkE. (2011). Team shared mental model as a contributing factor to team performance and students’ course satisfaction in blended courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2330–2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.012
17.
KirkmanB. L.MathieuJ. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. https://doi/10.1177/0149206305279113
18.
LeeL.-H.ZhouP.BraudT.HuiP. (2022). What is the Metaverse? An immersive cyberspace and open challenges. arXiv Preprint, 2022, arXiv:2206.03018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.03018
19.
LeeM.JohnsonT. E. (2008). Understanding the effects of team cognition associated with complex engineering tasks: Dynamics of shared mental models, task-SMM, and team-SMM. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20032
20.
LiD.ZhangQ. (2021). Temporal team mental model and performance: From the perspective of team process. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 766268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766268
21.
LiawS. Y.WuL. T.WongL. F.SohS. L. H.ChowY. L.RingstedC.LauT. C.LimW. S. (2019). “Getting everyone on the same page”: Interprofessional team training to develop shared mental models on interprofessional rounds. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34, 2912–2917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05320-z
22.
LimJ. Y.-K. (2022). Gender and psychological safety in virtual teams: The role of awareness types enabled by information technologies. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 28(5/6), 351–366. http://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2022-0006
23.
LinebargerJ. M.ScholandA. J.EhlenM. A.ProcopioM. J. (2005, November 6–9). Benefits of synchronous collaboration support for an application-centered analysis team working on complex problems: a case study. In Proceedings of 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’05) (pp. 51–60). Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, ACM Press.
24.
LuxenburgerA.PrangeA.MoniriM. M.SonntagD. (2016, September 12–16). MedicaLVR: Towards medical remote collaboration using virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp ’16) (pp. 321–324). Heidelberg, Germany, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
25.
MalnatiG.ViolaE.TrizioM.MossoC. O. (2022). Chat for teamwork discussion: An exploratory study in a training course. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 18(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.299006
26.
MarksM. A.ZaccaroS. J.MathieuJ. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 971–986. https://doi/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971
27.
MartinsL. L.GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. https://doi/10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002
28.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(1), 37–56. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.296
29.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273. https://doi/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
30.
MaynardM. T.GilsonL. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113475361
31.
McCombS.KennedyD.PerrymanR.WarnerN.LetskyM. (2010). Temporal patterns of mental model convergence: Implications for distributed teams interacting in electronic collaboration spaces. Human Factors, 52(2), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810370458
32.
MccombS.SimpsonV. (2014). The concept of shared mental models in healthcare collaboration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(7), 1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12307
33.
McGrathJ. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. Rinehart & Winston.
34.
McNeeseN. J.ReddyM. C. (2015). Articulating and understanding the development of a team mental model in a distributed medium. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 240–244. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591049
35.
MohammedS.FerzandiL.HamiltonK. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356804
36.
MohammedS.HamiltonK.TeslerR.MancusoV.McNeeseM. (2015). Time for temporal team mental models: Expanding beyond ‘what’ and ‘how’ to incorporate ‘when’. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 693–709. https://10.1080/1359432X.2015.1024664
37.
MohammedS.KlimoskiR.RentschJ. R. (2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 123–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032001
38.
MønsterD.HåkonssonD. D.EskildsenJ. K.WallotS. (2016). Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology & Behavior, 156, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004
39.
MüllerR.AntoniC. H. (2020). Individual perceptions of shared mental models of information and communication technology (ICT) and virtual team coordination and performance—The moderating role of flexibility in ICT use. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(3), 186–200. http://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000130
40.
MüllerR.AntoniC. H. (2022). Effects of ICT shared mental models on team processes and outcomes. Small Group Research, 53(2), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496421997889
41.
MüllerR.SchischkeD.GrafB.AntoniC. H. (2023). How can we avoid information overload and techno-frustration as a virtual team? The effect of shared mental models of information and communication technology on information overload and techno-frustration. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107438. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107438
42.
Nakarada-KordicI. (2016). Assessing mental models in multidisciplinary operating room teams [Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland].
43.
RedlichB.SiemonD.LattemannC.Robra-BissantzS. (2017, January 4–7). Shared mental models in creative virtual teamwork. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017) (pp. 1–10). Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaiʻi, USA, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
44.
RenugadeviR.KalaivaniC. T.Arul Edwin RajA.GracewellJ. (2024). Dynamic edge clustering and task scheduling for edge assisted metaverse system in the field of remote work and collaboration. Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience, 36(18), e8139. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8139
45.
ReynoldsR.BlickensderferE. (2009). Crew resource management and shared mental models: A proposal. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 19(1), 15–23. http://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2009.1380
SaikayasitR.SharplesS. (2009). The influence of shared-representation on shared mental models in virtual teams. In International conference on engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 269–278). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
48.
SantosC. M.UitdewilligenS.PassosA. (2015). A temporal common ground for learning: The moderating effect of shared mental models on the relation between team learning behaviours and performance improvement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 710–725. https://doi/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1049158
49.
SchulzeJ.KrummS. (2017). The “virtual team player” a review and initial model of knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics for virtual collaboration. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616675522
50.
ScozziB.CrowstonK.EseryelU. Y.LiQ. (2008, January 7–10). Shared mental models among open source software developers. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 306–316). Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, IEEE / ACM. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.391
51.
SinghA.FerryD.RamakrishnanA.BalasubramanianS. (2020). Using virtual reality in biomedical engineering education. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 142(11), 111013. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048005
52.
SinghH.CasciniG.McCombC. (2022). Virtual and face-to-face team collaboration comparison through an agent-based simulation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 144(7), 071706. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054242
53.
TeslerR.MohammedS.HamiltonK.MancusoV.McNeeseM. (2018). Mirror, mirror: Guided storytelling and team reflexivity’s influence on team mental models. Small Group Research, 49(3), 267–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417722025
54.
ThissenM. R.PageJ. M.BharathiM. C.AustinT. L. (2007, April 19–21). Communication tools for distributed software development teams. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce (SIGMIS-CPR ’07) (pp 28–35). St. Louis, Missouri, USA, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/1235000.1235007
55.
ThomasD. M.BostromR. P. (2007, January 3–6). The role of a shared mental model of collaboration technology in facilitating knowledge work in virtual teams. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS ’07) (pp. 37–37). Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, USA. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.511
56.
Van den BosscheP.GijselaersW. H.SegersM.KirschnerP. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521. https://doi/10.1177/1046496406292938
57.
XiangC. (2015). The role of social capital and shared mental model in virtual R&D teams. Wuhan International Conference on e-Business 2015 Proceedings, 36, 349–356.
