We document trends and patterns in the key attributes of the 24 top journals during 2001–2021 using data from the Web of Science. These trends include growth by disciplines and journals represented among selected journals in terms of growth in publications, relative publication share of disciplines, number of unique authors, attributes of prolific authors, and the extent of interdisciplinary contributions. We compare and contrast our findings with prior studies and offer a few conjectures on similarities and differences in the findings. We hope that our descriptive findings will spur further research on the production function of science and help identify the determinants of research productivity in top journals.
AgrawalVKhannaPSinghalK (2020) The role of research in business schools and the synergy between its four subdomains. Academy of Management Review45(4): 896–912.
2.
BabbarSKoufterosXBendolyE, et al. (2020) Looking at ourselves: Lessons about the operations management field learned from our top journals. Journal of Operations Management66: 349–365.
3.
BapnaRMarsdenJR (2002) The paper chase: Comparing the research productivity of quantitative/technical departments in schools of business. OR/MS Today29(6): 34–38.
BoyerEL (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6.
Burton-JonesA (2023) Editor’s comments: Tuum est. MIS Quarterly47(4): i–viii.
7.
Burton-JonesASarkerS (2021) Editor’s comments: Creating our editorial board position statement on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). MIS Quarterly45(4): iii–xii.
8.
Burton-JonesAWangG (2023) Editor’s comments: What makes a journal significant? From the tyranny of metrics to true impact. MIS Quarterly47(2): i–xiv.
9.
CardDDellaVignaS (2013) Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature51(1): 144–161.
10.
CardDDellaVignaS (2020) What do editors maximize? Evidence from four economics journals. Review of Economics and Statistics102(1): 195–217.
11.
ChenZGongCLinL, et al. (2015) Assessing junior faculty research productivity in the IS field: Recommendations for promotion and tenure standards for Asian schools. Communications of the Association for Information Systems36: 357–368.
12.
DeanDLLowryPBHumpherysS (2011) Profiling the research productivity of tenured information systems faculty at U.S. institutions. MIS Quarterly35(1): 1–15.
13.
DennisARValacichJSFullerMA, et al. (2006) Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems. MIS Quarterly30(1): 1–12.
14.
EllisonG (2002) Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy110(5): 994–1034.
15.
GloverSMPrawittDFSummersSL, et al. (2012) Publication benchmarking data based on faculty promoted at the top 75 U.S. accounting research institutions. Issues in Accounting Education27(3): 647–670.
16.
GuptaA (2018) Traits of successful research contributions for publication in ISR: Some thoughts for authors and reviewers. Information Systems Research29(4): 779–786.
17.
HeckmanJ (1998) Detecting discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives12(2): 101–116.
18.
HoppWJSimchi-LeviD (2021) Management science: The legacy of the past and challenge of the future. Management Science67(9): 5306–5316.
KerrWRLincolnWF (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. Journal of Labor Economics28(3): 473–508.
21.
KuhnTS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
KumarSTangCS (2022) Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: The 30th-anniversary issue of production and operations management. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4257–4261.
23.
LotkaAJ (1926) The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences16(12): 317–323.
24.
LucasHCMithasS (2011) Foreign-born IT workers in the US: Complements, not substitutes. IEEE IT Professional13(4): 36–40.
25.
MertonRK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science159(3810): 56–63.
26.
MithasSChenYLiuC, et al. (2022) Are foreign and domestic information technology professionals complements or substitutes?MIS Quarterly46(4): 2351–2366.
MithasSLucasHC (2015) What will it take to create a world-class B-school in India?Available at: http://www.businessworld.in/article/What-Will-It-Take-To-Create-A-World-class-B-School-In-India-/07-12-2015-88986/.BW BusinessWorld(14 Dec 2015), 106–108.
29.
MurthiBPSRaoRCRatchfordBT (2015) A descriptive analysis of publications in marketing science over its history. Marketing Science34(6): 779–786.
30.
MurthyUS (2016) Researching at the intersection of accounting and information technology: A call to action. Journal of Information Systems30(2): 159–167.
31.
NiemiAW (1988) Research productivity of American business schools, 1975-85. Review of Business and Economic ResearchXXIII(2): 1–17.
32.
PalmerD (2006) Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another’s work: ASQ 50 years out. Administrative Science Quarterly51: 535–559.
33.
PondyLR (1995) The reviewer as defense attorney (chapter 10). In: CummingsLLFrostPJ (eds) Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. 2nd ed.New Delhi: Sage Publications, 183–194.
34.
RaiA (2020) Editor’s comments—Achieving the MISQ trifecta vision: Reflections on the 2016–2020 journey. MIS Quarterly44(4): iii–iix.
35.
RothAVSinghalVR (2022) Pioneering role of the production and operations management in promoting empirical research in operations management. Production and Operations Management31: 4529–4543.
36.
SethiSPGuptaSAgrawalVK, et al. (2022) Nobel laureates’ contributions to and impacts on operations management. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4283–4303.
37.
Simchi-LeviD (2023) From the editor: Reflections on the last six years as editor-in-chief of management science. Management Science69(12): 7151–7157.
SinghalKSinghalJ (2022a) Technology and manufacturing-and-service operations before the industrial revolution. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4262–4275.
40.
SinghalKSinghalJ (2022b) Technology and manufacturing-and-service operations since the industrial revolution. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4276–4282.
41.
SpiegelM (2012) Reviewing less—Progressing more. The Review of Financial Studies25(5): 1331–1338.
42.
StarbuckWH (2005) How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science16(2): 180–203.
43.
StephanPE (1996) The economics of science. Journal of Economic LiteratureXXXIV(Sept): 1199–1235.
44.
StephanPELevinSG (2001) Exceptional contributions to US science by foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review20(1–2): 59–79.
45.
SudhirK (2016) Editorial: The exploration-exploitation tradeoff and efficiency in knowledge production. Marketing Science35(1): 1–9.
46.
SummersSLWoodDA (2017) An evaluation of the general vs. specialist nature of top accounting journals. Accounting Horizons31(2): 105–124.
47.
SwansonEP (2004) Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research21(1): 223–255.
48.
SwansonEPWolfeCJZardkoohiA (2007) Concentration in publishing at top-tier business journals: Evidence and potential explanations. Contemporary Accounting Research24(4): 1255–1289.
49.
TangCS (2015) The past, present, and future of manufacturing & service operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management17(1): 1–3.
TarafdarMDavisonRM (2018) Research in information systems: Intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches.Journal of the Association for Information Systems19(6): 523–551.
53.
TrieschmannJSDennisARNorthcraftGB, et al. (2000) Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1130–1141.
54.
ValacichJSFullerMASchneiderC, et al. (2006) Publication opportunities in premier business outlets: How level is the playing field?Information Systems Research17(2): 107–125.
55.
ZwassV (2023) Editorial introduction. Journal of Management Information Systems40(1): 1–2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
