This study assesses concentration of the top 50 universities (T50 concentration) in premier business journals and its correlation with journal impact metrics. We use 2008–2022 data from the Web of Science and Clarivate Analytics, focusing on 46 business journals from the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD 24) and Financial Times (FT 50) lists to document several findings. First, we find that the top 50 institutions, representing less than 0.5% of business schools globally, contribute a disproportionately large share of about 53% publications in these outlets. Second, our longitudinal analyses indicate that T50 concentration has remained relatively stable over the 15-year period. Finally, we find evidence of a positive and statistically significant association between T50 concentration and Article Influence Score, although we do not find any statistically significant relationship with other journal impact metrics. Importantly, we find a decline in the publication and citation share of articles authored exclusively by top-50 author teams, and a rise in share for mixed author teams from top-50 and non-top-50 universities. These findings provide data-driven insights to inform debates relating to merit and elitism in editorial and review processes in top journals.
AgrawalVKhannaPSinghalK (2020) The role of research in business schools and the synergy between its four subdomains. Academy of Management Review45(4): 896–912.
5.
AgrawalVK (2002) Constituencies of journals in production and operations management: Implications on reach and quality. Production and Operations Management11(2): 101–108.
6.
AguinisHCummingsCRamaniRS, et al. (2019) “An A is an A”: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives34(1): 135–154.
7.
AliAKlasaSYeungE (2009) The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with Compustat data: Implications for finance research. Review of Financial Studies22(10): 3839–3871.
8.
BabbarSKoufterosXBendolyE, et al. (2020) Looking at ourselves: Lessons about the operations management field learned from our top journals. Journal of Operations Management66: 349–365.
9.
BacciniAReC (2025) Who are the gatekeepers of economics? Geographic diversity, gender composition, and interlocking editorship of journal boards. Review of Political Economy37(2): 681–708.
10.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program (2011) Baldrige 20|20: An executive's guide to the criteria for performance excellence. Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
11.
BarneyJB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17: 99–120.
12.
BasoleRBendolyEChandrasekaranA, et al. (2022) Visualization in operations management research. Informs Journal on Data Science1(2): 172–187.
13.
BerleAA (1932) For whom corporate managers are trustees: A note. Harvard Law Review45(8): 1365–1372.
DavisMS (1971) That's interesting! towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences1: 309–344.
24.
DavisMS (1986) 'That's classic!' The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences16: 285–301.
25.
DavisonRMLowryPB (2023) ISJ Editorial: Addressing the implications of recent developments in journal impact factors. Information Systems Journal33: 419–436.
26.
DemeterMJeleAMajorZB (2022) The model of maximum productivity for research universities SciVal author ranks, productivity, university rankings, and their implications. Scientometrics127(8): 4335–4361.
27.
DemsetzH (1983) Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics16(1): 1–9.
28.
DennisARValacichJSFullerMA, et al. (2006) Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems. MIS Quarterly30(1): 1–12.
29.
DoddEM (1932) For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review45(8): 1145–1163.
Garcia OsmaBMoraAPierkJ (2023) Dissemination of accounting research. European Accounting Review32(5): 1053–1083.
34.
GolderPNDekimpeMGAnJT, et al. (2023) Learning from data: An empirics-first approach to relevant knowledge generation. Journal of Marketing87(3): 319–336.
35.
GriffithsMDWintersDB (2022) What is a high quality article in finance and which schools produce them?Journal of Financial Education48(2): 83–94.
36.
HongYHonigB (2016) Publish and politics: An examination of business school faculty salaries in Ontario. Academy of Management Learning & Education15(4): 665–685.
37.
HoppWJSimchi-LeviD (2021) Management science: The legacy of the past and challenge of the future. Management Science67(9): 5306–5316.
JensenMMecklingW (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3(4): 305–360.
40.
KoufterosXBabbarSBeharaR, et al. (2021) OM research: Leading authors and institutions. Decision Sciences52(1): 8–77.
41.
KumarSSinghalVR (2024) Ten most influential papers from the first thirty years of the Production and Operations Management journal. Production and Operations Management33(5): 1061–1063.
42.
KumarSTangCS (2022) Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: The 30th-anniversary issue of Production and Operations Management. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4257–4261.
43.
LeeSBozemanB (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science35(5): 673–702.
44.
LiEYLiaoCHYenHR (2013) Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy42(9): 1515–1530.
MartinR (2010) The age of customer capitalism. Harvard Business Review88(1): 58–65.
47.
MertonRK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science159(3810): 56–63.
48.
MettersRKetzenbergMAbbeyJ (2024) Determinants of operations management faculty salary: Is publishing in "A" journals the "bottom line"?Production and Operations Management33(2): 393–411.
49.
MirandaSBerenteNSeidelS, et al. (2022) Editor’s comments: Computationally intensive theory construction: A primer for authors and reviewers. MIS Quarterly46(2): i–xvi.
50.
MithasSChenYLimY, et al. (2022) On causality and plausibility of treatment effects in operations management research. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4558–4571.
51.
MithasSSilveiraA (2024) Trends and patterns in the key attributes of the 24 top business journals: 2001-2021. Production and Operations Management33(6): 1245–1264.
52.
MithasSSilveiraAZavadskiyG (2025) What do we know about the science of science in business and economics? Insights from the top 50 journals, 2008-2022. Production and Operations Management34(10): 2943–2969.
NewhouseLJBrandeauML (2021) Who are the gatekeepers? An examination of diversity in INFORMS journal editorial boards. Service Science13(3): 109–132.
55.
ParkerGGVan AlstyneMWChoudarySP (2016) Platform Revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York: Norton.
56.
Romero-SilvaRMarsillacEde LeeuwS (2025) Dominance of leading business schools in top journals: Insights for increasing institutional representation. Research Policy54(3): 105193.
57.
RothAVSinghalJSinghalK, et al. (2016) Knowledge creation and dissemination in operations and supply chain management. Production and Operations Management25(9): 1473–1488.
58.
SethiSP (2025) Building an operations management department from nowhere to here (1996–2023): Lessons learned. Production and Operations Management34(11): 9–15.
59.
SethiSPGuptaSAgrawalVK, et al. (2022) Nobel laureates’ contributions to and impacts on operations management. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4283–4303.
60.
Simchi-LeviD (2023) From the editor: Reflections on the last six years as editor-in-chief of management science. Management Science69(12): 7151–7157.
SinghalKSinghalJ (2022a) Technology and manufacturing-and-service operations before the industrial revolution. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4262–4275.
64.
SinghalKSinghalJ (2022b) Technology and manufacturing-and-service operations since the industrial revolution. Production and Operations Management31(12): 4276–4282.
65.
StephanPE (1996) The economics of science. Journal of Economic LiteratureXXXIV(Sept): 1199–1235.
66.
StephanPELevinSG (2001) Exceptional contributions to US science by foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review20(1-2): 59–79.
67.
StewartA (2023) Academic snobbery and the prospects for heterodox economics. Journal of Economic Issues57(4): 1142–1161.
68.
SwansonEP (2004) Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Research21(1): 223–255.
69.
SwansonEPWolfeCJZardkoohiA (2007) Concentration in publishing at top-tier business journals: Evidence and potential explanations. Contemporary Accounting Research24(4): 1255–1289.
70.
TangCS (2015) The past, present, and future of manufacturing & service operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management17(1): 1–3.
TrieschmannJSDennisARNorthcraftGB, et al. (2000) Serving constituencies in business schools: MBA program versus research performance. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1130–1141.
74.
ValacichJSFullerMASchneiderC, et al. (2006) Issues and opinions—publication opportunities in premier business outlets: How level is the playing field?Information Systems Research17(2): 107–125.
75.
Van AlstyneMWParkerGChoudarySP (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review94(4): 54–62.
76.
van DalenHP (2021) How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: The case of economists. Scientometrics126(2): 1675–1694.
77.
WapmanKHZhangSClausetA, et al. (2022) Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention. Nature610(7930): 120–127.
78.
WaySFMorganACLarremoreDB, et al. (2019) Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(22): 10729–10733.
79.
WebbWB (1961) The choice of the problem. American Psychologist16(5): 223–227.
80.
WernerfeltB (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal5(2): 171–180.
81.
WhitedRL (2025) Institutional ties and publications in top accounting journals. Management Science71(11): 9041–9070.
82.
ZhangSWapmanKHLarremoreDB, et al. (2022) Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities. Science Advances8(46): 2375–2548.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
