Vigil’s multiple marginality (MM) model of gang formation has resulted in hypotheses about why minority youth join gangs, and how these processes play out at multiple levels of analysis and across contexts. However, with a few exceptions, this framework has rarely been tested quantitatively, and especially in countries outside of North America. The current study assesses the MM model using data from the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study and aggregate country-level data. Results from multilevel analyses reveal some support for the framework, in that at least one measure of each component of the MM model was found to be a significant predictor of gang membership. Controlling for individual and country variables, measures of street socialization exhibited the strongest effects on gang involvement. Yet not all proposed factors were significant predictors across all models. Longitudinal data are necessary to fully support the dynamics of the MM model.
AebiM. (2009). Enquêtes de de´linquance autoreporte´e en Europe [Assessing deviance, crime and prevention in Europe]. Communaute´ Europe´enne sur les presses de l’imprimerie.
2.
BaumerE. P.ArnioA. N. (2012). Multi-level modeling and criminological inquiry. In GaddD.KarstedtS.MessnerS. F. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 97–110), SAGE Publishing.
3.
BursikR.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books.
4.
CaldwellB. (2010). Latinas’ experiences in relation to gangs: Intersectionality of race, class, gender, and the state. Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspective, 2, 19.
5.
Cephus-WilsonC. L. (2012). I am who you say I am; I am what you make me. An exploratory analysis of gangs in the heartland[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.
6.
DeckerS. H.MeldeC.PyroozD. C. (2013). What do we know about gangs and gang members and where do we go from here?Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 369–402.
7.
DeckerS. H.Van GemertF.PyroozD. C. (2009). Gangs, migration, and crime: The changing landscape in Europe and the USA. Revue de l’integration et de la migration internationale/Journal of International Migration and Integration, 10(4), 393–408.
8.
DensleyJ. A. (2015). Joining the gang: A process of supply and demand. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 235–256). Wiley.
9.
DrakeG.MeldeC. (2014). The problem of prediction: the efficacy of multiple marginality in cross-sectional versus prospective models. Journal of Crime and Justice, 37(1), 61–78.
10.
EnzmannD.MarshallI. H.KilliasM.Junger-TasJ.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. (2010). Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police and victimization data. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 159–183.
11.
EnzmannD.MarshallI. H.KilliasM.Junger-TasJ.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. (2015). Second international self-reported delinquency study, 2005–2007. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
12.
EstradaJ. N.GilreathT. D.AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR. (2013). Gang membership of California middle school students: Behaviors and attitudes as mediators of school violence. Health Education Research, 28(4), 626–639.
FrengA.EsbensenF. A. (2007). Race and gang affiliation: An examination of Multiple Marginality. Justice Quarterly, 24(4), 600–628.
15.
GattiU.HaymozS.SchadeeH. M. A. (2011). Deviant youth groups in 30 countries: Results from the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study. International Criminal Justice Review, 21(3), 208–224.
16.
HautalaD. S.Sittner HartshornK. J.WhitbeckL. B. (2016). Prospective childhood risk factors for gang involvement among North American Indigenous adolescents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(4), 390–410.
17.
HaymozS.MaxsonC.KilliasM. (2014). Street gang participation in Europe: A comparison of correlates. European Journal of Criminology, 11(6), 659–681.
18.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
19.
HowellJ. C. (2015). The history of street gangs in the United States: Their origins and transformations. Lexington Books.
20.
HowellJ. C.GriffithsE. (2019). Gangs in America’s Communities. Sage Publications.
21.
KleinM. W. (2007). Chasing after street gangs: A forty-year journey. Pearson Prentice Hall.
22.
KrohnM. D.SchmidtN. M.LizotteA. J.BaldwinJ. M. (2011). The impact of Multiple Marginality on gang membership and delinquent behavior for Hispanic, African American, and white male adolescents. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(1), 18–42.
LiX.StantonB.FeigelmanS. (2000). Impact of perceived parental monitoring on adolescent risk behavior over 4 years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(1), 49–56.
25.
LopezD. A.BrummettP. O. D. (2003). Gang membership and acculturation: ARSMA-II and Choloization. Crime & Delinquency, 49(4), 627–642.
26.
LöselF. (2001). Nonviolence: Protective factors. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 10706–10711). Elsevier.
27.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling (Vol. 143). Sage Publishing.
28.
MarshallI. H.EnzmannD. (2012). Methodology and design of the ISRD-2 study. In The many faces of youth crime (pp. 21–65). Springer.
29.
PageB.MarcelinL. H. (2003). Formation of gangs and involvement in drug use among marginalized youth: Uses of the anthropological view. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 31(2), 175–182.
30.
PyroozD. C.DensleyJ. A. (2016). Selection into street gangs: Signaling theory, gang membership, and criminal offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(4), 447–481.
31.
PyroozD. C.FoxA. M.DeckerS. H. (2010). Racial and ethnic heterogeneity, economic disadvantage, and gangs: A macro-level study of gang membership in urban America. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 867–892.
32.
QuinnK.WalshJ. L.Dickson-GomezJ. (2018). Multiple marginality and the variation in delinquency and substance use among adolescent gang members. Substance Use & Misuse. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2018.1528465
33.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage Publishing.
34.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
35.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.EarlsF. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
36.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquents in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. The University of Chicago Press.
Van GemertF.WeermanF. (2015). Understanding European gangs. In DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C. (Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 503–519). John Wiley & Sons.
39.
Van NgoH.CalhounA.WorthingtonC.PyrchT.EsteD. (2017). The unravelling of identities and belonging: Criminal gang involvement of youth from immigrant families. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18(1), 63–84.
40.
Ventura MillerH.BarnesJ. C.HartleyR. D. (2011). Reconsidering Hispanic gang membership and acculturation in a multivariate context. Crime & Delinquency, 57(3), 331–355.
41.
VigilD. (1979). Adaptation strategies and cultural life styles of Mexican American adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1(4), 375–392.
42.
VigilD. (2002). A rainbow of gangs: Street cultures in the mega-city. University of Texas Press.
43.
VigilJ. D. (1983). Chicano gangs: One response to Mexican urban adaptation in the Los Angeles area. Urban Anthropology, 12(1), 45–75.
44.
VigilJ. D. (1988). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in Southern California. University of Texas Press.
45.
VigilJ. D. (1999). Streets and schools: How educators can help chicano marginalized gang youth. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 270–288.
46.
VigilJ. D. (2003). Urban violence and street gangs. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 225–242.
47.
VigilJ. D. (2004). Gangs and group membership: Implications for schooling. In GibsonM. A.GandaraP.KoyamaJ. P. (Eds.), School connections: US Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 87–106). New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
VigilJ. D. (2010a). Gang redux: A balanced anti-gang strategy. Waveland Press.
49.
VigilJ. D. (2010b). Multiple Marginality and human development: Applying research insights for gang prevention and intervention. In ChaskinR. (Ed.), Youth gangs and community intervention (pp. 155–174). New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
50.
WeermanF. M.MaxsonC. L.EsbensenF. A.AldridgeJ.MedinaJ.van GemertF. (2009). Eurogang program manual[
Online report]. University of Missouri–St. Louis.
51.
WolfgangM. E.FerracutiF. (1967). The subculture of violence. Tavistock.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
