The present study contributes to the study of self-control among adolescents by testing how self-control is affected by societal vulnerability and violent values and by investigating how (in)variant this relationship is for boys and girls. The Belgian International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD-2) data were used to assess to what extent positive attitudes toward violence can be seen as mediators in the relationship between societal vulnerability and self-control. The findings suggest that violent values mediate the relationship between societal vulnerability and self-control. Despite results indicating higher self-control among females, when conducting the analyses separately by gender, we found that the relationship between societal vulnerability and self-control was very similar for boys and girls. It is concluded that societally vulnerable boys and girls are equally affected by the intermediate mechanism of violent values.
AbramsD.HoggM. A.Mendes-MarquesJ. (2005). The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
2.
ArcherL.HollingworthS.MendickH. (2010). Urban youth and education. Masidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
3.
ArneklevB. J.GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behaviour. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(3), 225-247.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BrewerL. E.TiceD.TwengeJ. M. (2007). The need to belong: Understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 506-520.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
6.
CameronD. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
CarioR. (1999). Les femmes résistent au crime [Women resist to crime]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
8.
ChappleC. L.JohnsonK. A. (2007). Gender differences in impulsivity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(3), 221-234.
9.
CretacciM. A. (2008). A general test of self-control theory: Has its importance been exaggerated?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 538-553.
10.
DeLisiM.VaughnM. (2008). The Gottfredson-Hirschi critiques revisited: Reconciling self-control theory, criminal careers, and career criminals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 520-537.
11.
DigmanJ. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Durant-DelvigneA.Duru-BellatM. (1998). Mixité scolaire et construction de genre [School coeducation and gender construction]. In MaruaniM. (Ed.), Les nouvelles frontières de l’inégalité: Hommes et femmes sur le marché du travail (pp. 83-92). Paris, France: La découverte.
14.
EgliN.VettenburgN.SavoieJ.LuciaS.GavrayC.ZemanK. (2010). Belgium, Canada and Switzerland: Are there differences in the contributions of selected variables on property and violent offences?European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 16(3), 183-189.
15.
EnzmannD.WetzelsP. (2003). Ethnic differences in juvenile delinquency: The role of violence legitimizing norms of masculinity. In DünkelF.DrenkhahnK. (Eds.), Youth violence: New patterns and local responses–experiences in east and west (pp. 316-345). Mönchengladbach, Germany: Forum Verlag Godesberg.
16.
EsbensenF.- A.Piper-DeschenesE.Thomas-WinfreeL. J. R. (1999). Differences between gang girls and gang boys: Results from a multisite survey. Youth Society, 31(1), 27-53.
17.
EsbensenF.- A.Wayne OdgoodD. (1999). Gang resistance education and training (GREAT): Results from the national evaluation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 194-225.
18.
EvansT. D.CullenF. T.BurtonJ. R.DunawayR. G.BensonM. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology, 35(3), 475-504.
19.
FavreD. (2007). Transformer la violence de l’élève: Cerveau, motivations et apprentissage [How to transform pupils’ violence? Brain, motivations and learning]. Paris, France: Editions Dunod.
20.
FrableD. E. S.BemS. L. (1985). If you are gender schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459-468.
21.
GallowayT. A.SkardhamarT. (2010). Does parental income matter for onset of offending?European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 424-440.
GavrayC. (2010a). Valeurs et attitudes stéréotypées à l’adolescence: quels enjeux en matière de réussite et d’insertion scolaires? [Stereotyped values and attitudes among adolescents: Which stakes concerning school success and insertion?]. In GavrayC.AdriaenssensA. (Eds.), Une fille = un garçon? Identifier les inégalités de genre à l’école pour mieux les combattre (pp. 89-137). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
24.
GavrayC. (2010b). Violence et stéréotypes sexués à l’adolescence [Violence and gender stereotypes in adolescence]. In GrouxD.BlayaC. (Eds.), Violence à l’école: Recherches et interventions (pp. 39-74). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
25.
GavrayC. (2010c). La violence dans les jeunes couples universitaires [Violence among young couples of bachelors]. Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 6, 754-771.
26.
GavrayC.VettenburgN. (2007). La délinquance juvénile autorévélée: Le cas de la Belgique [Self-reported delinquency: The case of Belgium]. Carrefours de l’Education, 24, 53-72.
27.
GelmanA. (2007). Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling?Statistical Science, 22(2), 153-164.
28.
GibsonC. L.WardJ. T.WrightJ. P.BeaverK. M.DeLisiM. (2010).Where does gender fit in the measurement of self-control?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(8), 883-903.
29.
GoodeyJ. (1997). Boys don’t cry: Masculinities, fear of crime and fearlessness. British Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 401-418.
30.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
GouxD.MaurinE. (2000). La persistance du lien entre pauvreté et échec scolaire [The persistent link between poverty and academic failure]. In National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (Ed.), France, portrait social (pp. 87-98). Paris, France: National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies.
32.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R. J.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
33.
HayC. (2001). Parenting, self-control and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707-736.
34.
HayC.ForrestW. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739-774.
35.
HigginsG. E.TewksburyR. (2006). Sex and self-control theory. Youth Society, 37(4), 479-503.
36.
HonnethA. (2003) Unsichtbarkeit. Stationen einer theorie der intersubjektivität [Invisibility. Steps of a theory of the intersubjectivity]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
37.
JensenE. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind. A study guide for teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids’ brains and what schools can do about it?Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
38.
Junger-TasJ.Haen-MarshallI.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszcynskaB. (2010). Juvenile delinquency in Europe and beyond: Results of the second international self-report delinquency study. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
39.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI.RibeaudD. (2003). Delinquency in an international perspective: The international self-reported delinquency study. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; Den Haag, the Netherlands: Kluger.
40.
Junger-TasJ.TerlouwG. J.KleinM. W. (Eds.). (1994). Delinquent behavior among young people in the western world. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; New York: Kluger.
41.
KoskinenS.MartelinT. (1994). Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men?Social Science & Medicine, 38(10), 1385-1396.
42.
LongshoreD. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102-113.
43.
LongshoreD.Turner-RandS.SteinJ. A. (2006). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34(2), 209-228.
44.
MarryC.MosconiN. (2006). Genre et education [Gender and education]. In BellerotJ.MosconiN. (Eds.), Traité des sciences et des pratiques de l’éducation (pp. 443-455). Paris, France: Dunod.
45.
MarshallI. H.EnzmannD. (2012). The generalizability of self-control theory. In Junger-TasJ.Haen-MarshallI.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszcynskaB. (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime: Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and culture (pp. 285-328). New York: Springer.
46.
MucchielliL. (2000). Familles et délinquances: Un bilan pluridisciplinaire des recherches francophones et anglophones [Families and delinquencies: A pluridisciplinary assessment]. In Centre for Sociological Research on Penal Law and Institutions (Ed.), Études et données pénales, 96. Paris, France: Centre for Sociological Research on Penal Law and Institutions.
47.
NewburnT.StankoE. A. (1994). Just boys doing business?London: Routledge.
48.
PauwelsL. (2008). Geweld in groepverband by Antwerpse jongeren: De bijdrage van schoolcontext en levenstijl [Youth group violence in Antwerp: The contribution of school context and lifestyle]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 50(1), 3-16.
49.
PauwelsL.SvenssonR. (2010). Informal controls and the explanation of propensity to offend: A test in two urban samples. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16(1), 15-27.
50.
PauwelsL.SvenssonR. (2011). Exploring the relationship between offending and victimization: What is the role of risky lifestyles and low self-control? A test in two urban samples. European Journal of Criminal Policy & Research, 17(3), 163-177. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/b40228177g6481v4/
51.
PauwelsL.VettenburgN.GavrayC.BrondeelR. (2011). Societal vulnerability and troublesome youth group involvement (TYG): The mediating role of violent values and low self-control. International Criminal Justice Review, 2, 283-296.
52.
PellegriniA. D.BartiniM.BrooksF. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimisation in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 216-224.
53.
PiqueroA. R.BouffardJ. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24, 1-27.
54.
PlasmanR.SissokoS. (2004). Comparing apples with oranges: Revisiting the gender wage gap in an international perspective (Discussion Paper 1449). Bonn, Germany: IZA–Institute for the Study of Labor.
55.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
56.
RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2006). The “drug-crime link” from a self-control perspective: An empirical test in a Swiss youth sample. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 33-67.
57.
RomigC.BakkenL. (1992). Intimacy development in middle adolescence: Its relationship to gender and family cohesion and adaptability. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 325-338.
58.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1997). A life course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In ThornberryT. (Ed.), Development theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133-161). London: Transaction.
59.
SherryJ. L.LucasK.GreenbergB. S.LachlanK. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60.
SilveraR. (1996). Le salaire des femmes, toutes choses inégales par ailleurs [The women’s salary, all things being unequal]. Paris: La Documentation Française, Collection Droits des femmes.
61.
SvenssonR.PauwelsL.WeermanF. M. (2010). Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(6), 732-743.
62.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-322.
63.
TittleC. R.WardD. A.GrasmickH. G. (2003). Gender, age, and crime/deviance: A challenge to self-control theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 426-453.
64.
TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R.PrattT. C. (2005). The school as context of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(4), 327-339.
65.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F. (2005). Social exclusion increases aggression and self-defeating behavior while reducing intelligent thought and prosocial behavior. In AbramsD.HoggM. A.Mendes-MarquesJ. M. (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 27-46). New York: Psychology Press.
66.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.CiaroccoC.BartelsM. J. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56-66.
67.
VettenburgN. (1988). Schoolervaringen, delinquentie en maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid [School experiences, delinquency and societal vulnerability]. Leuven, Belgium: Onderzoeksgroep Jeugdcriminologie.
68.
VettenburgN.WalgraveL. (2008). Maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid, school en verstedelijking [Societal vulnerability, school and urbanization]. In WeijersI.EliaertsC. (Eds.), Jeugdcriminologie. Achtergronden van jeugdcriminaliteit [Juvenile criminology: Contexts of youth crime] (pp. 183-205). Den Haag, the Netherlands: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
69.
VettenburgN.WalgraveL.Van KerckvoordeJ. (1984). Jeugdwerkloosheid, delinquentie en maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid [Youth unemployment, delinquency and societal vulnerability]. Antwerpen/Arnhem, Belgium: Kluwer/Gouda Quint.
70.
VidalC. (2007). Hommes, femmes, avons-nous le même cerveau? [Men, women: Have we the same brain?] Paris, France: Les Petites pommes du savoir.
71.
WalgraveL.VettenburgN. (1996). Een integratie van theorieën: Maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid [An integration of theories: Societal vulnerability]. In WalgraveL. (Ed.), Confronterende jongeren (pp. 36-53). Leuven, Belgium: Universitaire Pers, Reeks Samenleving, Criminaliteit en Strafgerechtspleging.
72.
WikströmP. O. H. (2005). The social origins of pathways in crime. Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. In FarringtonD. (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending. Advances in criminological theory (pp. 211-246). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction 14.
73.
WikströmP. O. H.SvenssonR. (2010). When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 395-410.
74.
WikströmP. O. H.TreiberK. (2007). The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 237-264.
75.
WrightB.CaspiE. A.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (1999). Self-control and crime opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45(1), 102-113.
76.
WrightB.CaspiE. A.MoffittT. E.SilvaP. A. (2006). Gender, self-control and informal social control in adolescence. Low self-control, social bonds and crime: Social causation, social selection or both?Criminology, 37(3), 479-514.
