Closed-circuit television (CCTV) and body-worn video cameras (BWVCs) have rapidly spread throughout policing. Such widespread deployment has heightened the importance of identifying best practices for both of these technologies. The research community has worked toward the identification of such best practices, with bodies of knowledge emerging for both CCTV and BWVCs over recent decades. Given its earlier emergence, research on CCTV is more developed. Nonetheless, the BWVC literature is quickly becoming robust, with BWVC research developing at a much more rapid pace than research on most other police technologies. This essay reviews the CCTV and BWVC literatures across four main areas of inquiry: (1) program effect and common outcome measures, (2) contextual factors influencing program effect, (3) intervention costs, and (4) implementation issues. Specific attention is paid to knowledge gaps within the CCTV literature and how BWVC research can avoid (or, in certain cases, already has avoided) similar knowledge gaps.
AlexandrieG. (2017). Surveillance cameras and crime: A review of randomized and natural experiments. Journal of Scandinavian Stuides in Criminolgy and Crime Prevention. doi:10.1080/14043858.2017.1387410
2.
ArielB. (2016). Increasing cooperation with the police using body worn cameras. Police Quarterly, 19, 326–362.
3.
ArielB.FarrarW.SutherlandA. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 509–535.
4.
ArielB.SutherlandA.HenstockD.YoungJ.DroverP.SykesJ.…HendersonR. (2016a). Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 744–755.
5.
ArielB.SutherlandA.HenstockD.YoungJ.DroverP.SykesJ.…HendersonR. (2016b). Report: Increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras…are driven by officer discretion: A protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 453–463.
6.
ArielB.SutherlandA.HenstockD.YoungJ.DroverP.SykesJ.…HendersonR. (2017a). “Contagious accountability”: A global multisite randomized controlled trial on the effect of police body-worn cameras on citizens’ complaints against the police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1–24. doi:10.1177/0093854816668218
7.
ArielB.SutherlandA.HenstockD.YoungJ.SosinskiG. (2017b). The deterrence spectrum: Explaining why police body-worn cameras ‘work’ of ‘backfire’ in aggressive police-public encounters. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. doi:10.1093/police/paw051
8.
AshbyM. (2017). The value of CCTV surveillance cameras as an invstigative tool: An empirical analysis. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23, 441–459.
BragaA. (2010). Setting a higher standard for the evaluation of problem-oriented policing initiatives. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 173–182.
11.
BragaA.ColdrenJ.SousaW.RodriguezD.AlperO. (2017). The benefits of body-worn cameras: New findings from a randomized controlled trail at the Las Vegas metropolitan police department. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, 2013-IJ-CX-0016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
12.
BragaA.SchnellC. (2013). Evaluating place-based policing strategies: Lessons learned from the smart policing initiative in Boston. Police Quarterly, 16, 339–357.
13.
BurrowsJ. (1978). The impact of closed circuit television on crime in the London underground. In MayhewP.ClarkeR.BurrowsJ.HoughJ.WinchesterS. (Eds.), Crime in public view(Home Office Research Study, #49). London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
14.
CameronA.KolodinskiE.MayH.WilliamsN. (2008). Measuring the Effects of Video Surveillance on Crime in Los Angeles. Report prepared for the California Research Bureau. USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development: Los Angeles, CA.
15.
CaplanJ.KennedyL.PetrossianG. (2011). Police-monitored CCTV cameras in Newark, NJ: A quasi-experimental test of crime deterrence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 255–274.
16.
ClearT. (2010). Policy and evidence: The challenge to the American Society of Criminology. Criminology, 48, 1–25.
17.
CubittT.LesicR.MyersG.CorryR. (2017). Body-worn video: A systematic review of literature. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 50, 379–396.
18.
CussonM. (1993). Situational deterrence. In ClarkeR. (Ed.), Crime prevetnion studies: Fear during the criminal act (Vol. 1, pp. 55–68). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
19.
DroverP.ArielB. (2015). Leading an experiment in police body-worn video cameras. International Criminal Justice Review, 25, 80–97.
20.
DurlaufS.NaginD. (2011). Imprisonment and crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 13–54.
21.
EllisT.JenkinsC.SmithP. (2015). Evaluation of the introduction of personal issue body worn video cameras (Operation Hyperion) on the isle of wight: Final report to hampshire constabulary. Statewide agricultural land use baseline 2015. Portsmouth, England: University of Portsmouth.
22.
FarringtonD.BennettT.WelshB. (2007a). The Cambridge evaluation of the effects of CCTV on crime. In FarrelD.BowersK.JohnsonS.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Imagination for crime preventions. Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. Crime prevention studies (Vol. 21, pp. 187–201). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
23.
FarringtonD.GillM.WaplesS.ArgomanizJ. (2007b). The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: Meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 21–38.
24.
Floyd et al. v. The City of New York, 959 F.Supp.2d 540 (2013).
25.
FoucheA. (2014). Officer attitudes on deployment of body-worn cameras in the University of Georgia Police Department Patrol Division. Campus Law Enforcement Journal, 44, 21–28.
26.
GannoniA.WillisM.TaylorE.LeeM. (2017). Surveillance technoloiges and crime control: Understanding police detainees’ perspectives on police body-worn video (BWV) and CCTV cameras(Report to the Criminology Research Advisory Council, Grant: CRG 31/14-15). Griffith, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
27.
GerellM. (2016). Hot spot policing with actively monitored CCTV cameras: Does it reduce assaults in public places?International Criminal Justice Review, 26, 187–201.
28.
GillM.LovedayK. (2003). What do offenders think about CCTV?Crime Prevention and Commmunity Safety: An International Journal, 5, 17–25.
29.
GillM.SpriggsA. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV. London, England: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
GreeneJ. (2014). New directions in policing: Balancing prediction and meaning in police research. Justice Quarterly, 31, 193–228.
33.
GrossmithL.OwensC.FinnW.MannD.DaviesT.BaikaL. (2015). Police, cameras, evidence: London’s cluster randomised controlled trial of body worn video. London, England: College of Policing.
34.
HayesR.DownsD. (2011). Controlling retail theft with CCTV dome, CCTV Publiv view monitors, and protective containers: A randomized controlled trial. Security Journal, 24, 237–250.
35.
HeadleyA.GueretteR.ShariatiA. (2017). A field experiment of the impact of body-worn cameras (BWCs) on polcie office behavior and perceptions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 102–109.
36.
HedbergE.KatzC.ChoateD. (2016). Body-worn cameras and citizen interactions with police officers: Estimating plausible effects given varying compliance levels. Justice Quarterly, 1–25. doi:10.1080/07418825.2016.1198825
37.
HenstockD.ArielB. (2017). Testing the effects of police body-worn cameras on use of force during arrests: A randomized controlled trial in a large British police force. European Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/1477370816686120
38.
JenningsW.FridellL.LynchM. (2014). Cops and cameras: Officer perceptions of the use of body-worn cameras in law enforcement. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 549–556.
39.
JenningsW.FridellL.LynchM.JetelinaK.Reingle GonzalezJ. (2017). A quasi-experimental evaluation of the effects of police body-worn cameras (BWCs) on response-to-resistance in a large metropolitan police department. Deviant Behavior, 38, 1332–1339.
40.
JenningsW.LynchM.FridellL. (2015). Evaluating the impact of police officer body-worn cameras (BWVCs) on response-to-resistance and serious external complaints: Evidence from the Orlando police department (OPD) experience utilizing a randomized controlled experiment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 480–486.
41.
JohnsonS.TilleyN.BowersK. (2015). Introducing EMMIE: An evidence rating scale to encourage mixed-method crime prevention synthesis reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 459–473.
KevalH.SasseM. A. (2010). “Not the usual suspects”: A study of factors reducing the effectiveness of CCTV. Security Journal, 23, 134–154.
44.
KingJ.MulliganD.RaphaelS. (2008). CITRIS Report: The San Francisco community safety camera program. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of San Francisco’s Community Safety Cameras. Berkeley, CA: Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society.
45.
KoperC.LumC.WillisJ.WoodsD.HibdonJ. (2015). Realizing the potential of technology in policing. A multisite study of the social, organizational, and behavarioral aspects of implementing policing technologies. Washington, DC: Police Execuitve Research Forum.
46.
KyleM.WhiteD. (2016). The impact of law enforcement officer perceptions of organizational justice on their attitudes regarding body-worn cameras. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 68–83.
47.
LaurD.LeBlancB.StephenT.LaneP.TaylorD. (2010). Proof of concept study: Body worn video and in-vehicle video. Victoria, BC: Victoria Police Department.
48.
LaVigneN.LowryS. (2011). Evaluation of camera use to prevent crime in commuter parking lots. A randomized controlled trial. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
49.
LaVigneN.LowryS.MarkmanJ.DwyerA. (2011). Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
LumC.KoperC.MerolaL.SchererA.ReiouxA. (2015). Existing and ongoing body worn camera research: Knowledge gaps and opportunities. Report for the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Fairfax, VA: Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, George Mason University.
52.
LumC.KoperC.WillisJ. (2017). Understanding the limits of technology’s impact on police effectivness. Police Quarterly, 20, 135–163.
53.
McClureD.LaVigneN.LynchM.GolianL. (2017). How body cameras affect community members’ percpetions of police. Results from a randomized controlled trial of one agency’s pilot. Washington, DC: Urban Instititue.
54.
McGloinJ.ThomasK. (2013). Experimental tests of criminological theory. In WelshB.BragaA.BruinsmaG. (Eds.), Experimental criminology: Prospects for advancing science and public policy (pp. 15–42). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
McLeanS.WordenR.KimM. (2013). Here’s looking at you: An evaluation of public CCTV cameras and their effects on crime and disorder. Criminal Justice Review, 38, 303–334.
56.
MillerT.ToliverJ., & Police Executive Research Forum (PERF). (2014). Implementing a body-worn camera program: Recomendations and lessons learned. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services.
57.
MorrowW.KatzC.ChoateD. (2016). Assessing the impact of police body-worn cameras on arresting, prosecuting, and convicting suspects of intimate partner violence. Police Quarterly, 19, 303–325.
MushenoM.LevineJ.PalumboD. J. (1978). Television surveillance and crime prevention: Evaluating an attempt to create defensible space in public housing. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 647–656.
60.
NorrisC. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In LyonD. (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk and digital discrimination (pp. 249–281). New York, NY: Routledge.
NowackiJ.WillitsD. (2016). Adoption of body cameras by United States police agencies: An organisational analysis. Policing and Society. doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1267175
63.
ODS Consulting. (2011). Body worn video projects in Paisley and Aberdeen, self evaluation. Glasgow, England: Author.
64.
OwensC.MannD.McKennaR. (2014). The Essex body worn video trial: The impact of body worn video on criminal justice outcomes of domestic abuse incidents. London, England: College of Policing.
65.
PelfreyW.KeenerS. (2016). Police body-worn cameras: A mixed method approach assessing perceptions of efficacy. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39, 491–506.
66.
PhelpsJ.StrypeJ.Le BelluS.LahlouS.AandalJ. (2016). Experiential learning and simulation-based training in Norwegian police education: Examining body-worn video as a tool to encourage reflection. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1–16. doi:10.1093/police/paw014
67.
PhillipsC. (1999). A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use. Crime Prevention Studies, 10, 123–155.
68.
PizaE. (2018). The Crime Prevention Effect of CCTV in Public Places: A Propensity Score Analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41, 14–30.
69.
PizaE.CaplanJ.KennedyL. (2014a). Is the punishment more certain? An analysis of CCTV detections and enforcement. Justice Quarterly, 31, 1015–1043.
70.
PizaE.CaplanJ.KennedyL. (2014b). Analyzing the influence of micro-level factors on CCTV camera effect. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 237–264.
71.
PizaE.CaplanJ.KennedyL. (2017). CCTV as a tool for early police intervetnion: Preliminary lessons from nine case studies. Security Journal, 30, 247–265.
72.
PizaE.CaplanJ.KennedyL.GilchristA. (2015). The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 43–69.
73.
PizaE.GilchristA.CaplanJ.KennedyL.O’HaraB. (2016). The financial implications of merging proactive CCTV monitoring and directed police patrol: A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 403–429.
74.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
75.
PriksM. (2014). Do surveillance cameras affect unruly behavior? A closer look at grandstands. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116, 1160–1179.
76.
PriksM. (2015). The effects of surveillance cameras on crime: Evidence from the Stockholm subway. The Economic Journal, 125, F289–F305.
77.
RatcliffeJ. (2006). Video surveillance of public places (Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Response Guide Series. Guide No. 4). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing.
78.
RatcliffeJ.GroffE. (2011). Preliminary findings from the Philadelphia CCTV study. Presentation at the American Sociery of Criminolgy Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
79.
RatcliffeJ.TaniguchiT.TaylorR. (2009). The crime reduction effects of public CCTV cameras: A multi-method spatial approach. Justice Quarterly, 26, 746–770.
80.
ReidA.AndresenM. (2012). The impact of closed-circuit television in a car park on the fear of crime: Evidence from a victimization survey. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 14, 293–316.
81.
ReidA.AndresenM. (2014). An evaluation of CCTV in a car park using police and insurance data. Security Journal, 27, 55–79.
82.
ReavesB. (2015). Local police departments, 2013: Equipment and technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
83.
SalveminiA.PizaE.CarterJ.GrommonE.MerrittN. (2015). Integrating human factors engineering and information processing approaches to facilitate evaluations in criminal justice technology research. Evaluation Review, 39, 308–338.
84.
SampsonR.KnightC. (2013). Translating causal claims: Principles and strategies for policy-relevant criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, 12, 587–616.
85.
ScottN.HiggsP.CaulkinsJ. P.AitkenC.CoggerS.DietzeP. (2016). The introduction of CCTV and associated changes in heroin purchase and injection settings in Footscray, Victoria, Australia. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 265–275.
86.
ShermanL. (1998). Policing evidence-based policing. Ideas in American policing evidence-based policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
87.
ShermanL.FarringtonD.WelshB.MackenzieD. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. New York, NY: Routledge.
88.
SivarajasingamV.ShepherdJ.MatthewsK. (2003). Effect of urban closed circuit television on assault injury and violence detecton. Injury Prevention, 9, 312–316.
89.
SmithG. (2004). Behind the scenes: Examining constructions of deviance and informal practices among CCTV control room operators in the UK. Surveillance & Society, 2, 376–395.
90.
SousaW.ColdrenJ.RodriguezD.BragaA. (2016). Research on body worn cameras: Meeting the challenges of police operations, program implementation, and randomized controlled trial designs. Police Quarterly, 19, 363–384.
91.
SparrowM. (2011). Governing science. New Perspectives in Policing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
92.
StanleyJ. (2015). Police body-mounted cameras: With right policies in place, a win for all. Washington, DC: American Civil Liberties Union.
93.
StedmonA.HarrisS.WilsonJ. (2011). Simulated multiplexed CCTV: The effects of screen layout and task complexity on user performance and strategies. Security Journal, 24, 344–356.
94.
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2014). Investigation of the Newark police department. Washington, DC: United States Attorney’s Office.
95.
VoigtR.CampN.VinodkumarP.HamiltonW.HeteyR.GriffithsC.…AberhardtJ. (2017). Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. Proceedings of the National Acadmey of Science of the United States of America, 114, 6521–6526.
96.
WelshB.FarringtonD. (2002). Crime prevention effects of closed circuit television: A systematic review (Research Study No. 25). London, England: Home Office.
97.
WelshB.FarringtonD. (2008). Effect of closed circuit television surveillance on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17, 1–73.
98.
WelshB.FarringtonD. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26, 716–745.
99.
WhiteM.GaubJ.TodakN. (2017). Exploring the potential for body-worn cameras to reduce violence in police-citizen encounters. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. doi:10.1093/police/paw057
100.
WickramasekeraN.WrightJ.ElseyH.MurrayJ.TubeufS. (2015). Cost of crime: A systematic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 218–228.
101.
WilliamsD.AhmedJ. (2009). The relationship between antisocial stereotypes and public CCTV systems: Exploring fear of crime in the modern surveillance society. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 743–758.
102.
WingeS.KnutssonJ. (2003). An evaluation of the CCTV scheme at Oslo central railway station. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 5, 49–59.
103.
YokumD.RavishankarA.CoppockA. (2017). Evaluating the effets of police body-worn cameras: An randomized controlled trial (Working Paper). Washington, DC: The Lab @ DC.
104.
YoungJ.ReadyJ. (2015). Diffusion of ideas and technology: The role of networks in influencing the endorsement and use of on-officer video cameras. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 243–261.
