Two university music education faculty aimed to expand mentoring beyond a one-to-one relationship to a more collaborative approach by creating a year-long online mentoring network of experienced and novice music educators. The purpose of this article is to describe the network’s structure and content, and discuss outcomes and recommendations based on participating teachers’ perspectives and experiences. Network materials promoted discussion and reflection on various music teaching and learning topics; the sharing of strategies, ideas, and resources; and mutual support and encouragement. Participants discussed topics with direct application for their classes and shared rewarding teaching moments, student successes, positive assessment outcomes, and struggles with fatigue and lack of student engagement. They stated the network provided a supportive space that facilitated connection and reflection, empathetic feedback, and teaching strategy and resource suggestions. Recommendations included more active opportunities to engage with and build relationships with each other, synchronous activities via videoconferencing platforms, and more facilitator participation.
AjeroM. (2007). Web 2.0: How the new World Wide Web is connecting music teachers and students. The American Music Teacher, 57(3), 48–49. www.jstor.org/stable/43539428
2.
BaumgartnerC. M. (2020). Supporting beginning music teachers: The development of the Oklahoma Music Educators Association Mentorship Program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719885645
3.
Beane-KatnerL. (2014). Anchoring a mentoring network in a new faculty development program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.902558
4.
Bell-RobertsonC. (2014). “Staying on our feet”: Novice music teachers’ sharing of emotions and experiences within an online community. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508410
5.
Bell-RobertsonC. (2015). Beyond mentoring: A review of literature detailing the need for additional and alternative forms of support for novice music teachers. Update:Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314547910
6.
BergM. H.ConwayC. M. (2017). The design and implementation of the ASTA Mentor Program: Perceptions of program developers and mentor preparation workshop participants. String Research Journal, 7(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/194849921600700103
7.
BergM. H.ConwayC. M. (2020). Retired teachers as mentors in the American String Teachers Association Mentor Program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 223, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.223.0059
8.
BergM. H.RickelsD. A. (2018). Mentoring for mentors: The Music Mentor Plus program. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083717720634
9.
BernardC. F.WeissL.AbelesH. (2018). Space to share: Interactions among music teachers in an online community of practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research In Music Education, 215, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.215.0075
10.
BlairD. (2008). Mentoring novice teachers: Developing a community of practice. ResearchStudies in Music Education, 30(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x08097502
11.
CarterM.FrancisR. (2001). Mentoring and beginning teachers’ workplace learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660120091856
12.
ConwayC. M. (2003). An examination of district-sponsored beginning music teacher mentor practices. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345645
13.
ConwayC. M.HolcombA. (2008). Perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their work as music mentors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323073
14.
CoombsD.GoodwinK. (2013). Give them something to talk about: The role of dialogue in mentoring relationships. English Journal, 102(3), 58–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23365374
15.
GareisC. R.Nussbaum-BeachS. (2007). Electronically mentoring to develop accomplishedprofessional teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3–4), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9060-0
JohnsonD. C.StanleyA. M. (2021). A pilot project exploring rural classroom music teachers’ perceptions and practices via an online professional development course. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 30(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837211008658
Lo IaconoV.SymondsP.BrownD. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
22.
MaciàM.GarcíaI. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
23.
MurphyK. L.MahoneyS. E.ChenC.Mendoza-DiazN. V.YangX. (2005). Aconstructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Education, 26(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291454
24.
Orland-BarakL.HasinR. (2010). Exemplary mentors’ perspectives towards mentoring across mentoring contexts: Lessons from collective case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.009
SmithM. V. (2003). A model mentor project. In ConwayC. M. (Ed.), Great beginnings for Mentoring and supporting new teachers (pp. 83–90). The National Association for Music Education.
27.
SmithM. V. (2005). Modern mentoring: Ancient lessons for today. Music Educators Journal, 92(2), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/3400199
28.
SmithR. H. (2013). Virtual induction: A novice teacher’s use of Twitter to form an informal mentoring network. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.001
29.
SorcinelliM. D.YunJ. (2007). From mentor to mentoring networks: Mentoring in the new academy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.6.58-C4
30.
TurkR. L. (1999). Get on the team: An alternative mentoring model. In SchererM. (Ed.), A Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 90–95). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Vaughan MarraJ. (2019). New teacher learning in a digital mentoring environment: Voices of the mentors [Doctoral dissertation]. Deep Blue, The University of Michigan. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/149980
33.
WeimerK. R. (2017). “We’re just kind of walking side by side”: Music teacher mentor/mentee relationships in Connecticut’s Teacher Education and Mentoring Program (TEAM). [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/14351
WestC.ClauhsM. (2019). Peers observing peers: Exploring cross-institutional observations and dialogues facilitated by videoconferencing software. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083718803633
36.
WhitingV.de JanaszS. (2004). Mentoring in the 21st century: Using the Internet to build skills and networks. Journal of Management Education, 28(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252639
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
