Band and choral preservice teachers (N = 44) studied band and choral scores, listened to recordings of school ensembles, and identified errors in the recordings. Results indicated that preservice teachers identified significantly more errors when listening to recordings of their primary area (band majors listening to band, p = .045; choral majors listening to chorus, p = .012). Furthermore, band majors identified rhythm errors more frequently than pitch errors when listening to both types of ensembles, while chorus majors listened predominantly for pitch errors. A significant correlation existed between choral majors’ ability to detect pitch errors in choral recordings and their ability to detect pitch errors in band recordings (r = .556). Theory course grades were not significantly correlated to error detection abilities, but aural skills course grades were related to ability to identify pitch errors outside the primary area (band majors, r = .441; choral majors, r = .611).
AndrewsB. D.QuinnR. J. (2004). First-year teaching assignments: A descriptive analysis. The Clearing House, 78, 78–83.
2.
BrandM.BurnsedV. (1981). Music abilities and experiences as predictors of error-detection skill. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 91–96. doi:10.2307/3345017
3.
BregmanA. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4.
ByoJ. L. (1993). The influence of textural and timbral factors on the ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 156–167. doi:10.2307/3345405
5.
ByoJ. L. (1997). The effects of texture and number of parts on the ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 51–66. doi:10.2307/3345465
6.
ByoJ. L.SheldonD. A. (2000). The effect of singing while listening on undergraduate music majors’ ability to detect pitch and rhythm errors. Journal of Band Research, 36(1), 26–46.
7.
CavittM. E. (2003). A descriptive analysis of error correction in instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 218–230. doi:10.2307/3345375
8.
ConstanzaA. P. (1971). Programmed instruction in score reading skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 453–459.
9.
CroweD. R. (1996). Effects of score study style on beginning conductors’ error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 160–171. doi:10.2307/3345668
10.
DavisS. (2010). Error detection in the aural skills class: Research and pedagogy. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 24, 37–67.
11.
DealJ. J. (1985). Computer-assisted instruction in pitch and rhythm error detection. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 159–166. doi:10.2307/3344803
12.
DeCarboN. J. (1982). The effects of conducting experience and programmed materials on error-detection scores of college conducting students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 187–200. doi:10.2307/3345085
13.
GonzoC. L. (1971). An analysis of factors related to choral teachers ability to detect pitch errors while reading the score. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 259–271.
14.
GroulxT. J. (2013). The influence of tonal and atonal contexts on error detection accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 233–243. doi:10.2307/41999579
15.
GrunowR. F. (1980). An investigation of the relative effectiveness of four modes of score preparation on visual-aural discrimination skills development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/288131494?accountid=11225
16.
GrunowR. F. (1985). MLR choral score reading program workbook. Chicago, IL: GIA.
17.
JordanJ. (2006). The choral conductor’s aural tutor. Chicago, IL: GIA.
18.
RamseyD. S. (1979). Programmed instruction using band literature to teach pitch and rhythm error detection to music education students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 149–162. doi:10.2307/3344966
19.
SheldonD. A. (1998). Effects of contextual sight-singing and aural skills training on error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 384–395. doi:10.2307/3345550
20.
SheldonD. A. (2004). Effects of multiple listenings on error-detection acuity in multivoice, multitimbral musical examples. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 102–115. doi:10.2307/3345433
21.
SidnellR. G. (1971). Self-instructional drill materials for student conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 19, 85–91. doi:10.2307/3344117
22.
SpradlingR. (2010). Error detection: Exercises for the instrumental conductor. New York, NY: Carl Fischer.
23.
StuartM. (1979). The use of videotape recordings to increase teacher trainees’ error detection skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 14–19. doi:10.2307/3345115
24.
StwolinskiG. D.FaulconerJ.SchwarzkopfA. B. (1988). A comparison of two approaches to learning to detect harmonic alterations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 83–94. doi:10.2307/3345242
TaylorC. C. (1963). Critique of a study of the ability of musicians to detect melodic and harmonic errors in the performance of choral music while inspecting the score. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1(1), 45–49.
27.
VanderGheynstP. J. (1978). The effect of timbre on auditory-visual discrimination (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text database.
28.
Van OyenL. G.NiermanG. E. (1998). The effects of two approaches to instrumental score preparation on the error detection ability of student conductors. Contributions to Music Education, 25(2), 85–97.
29.
WaggonerD. T. (2011). Effects of listening conditions, error types, and ensemble textures on error detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 56–71.
