The purpose of this study was to investigate undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ score study practices as they related to the effectiveness of their simulated conducting. Participants (N = 30) were video recorded in two sessions in which they completed a 20-min score study session and a simulated conducting performance. In the first score study session, all 30 conductors studied Mini-Suite for Band, Movement 1. In Session 2, participants studied Portrait of a Clown but this time either with a model recording (n = 15) or without one (n = 15). We computed the overall duration of participants’ score study behaviors for both pieces. Additional data included graduate students’ evaluations of participants’ post–score study conducting performances and an inventory of participants’ score study markings. We found a significant difference in the proportion of time spent in score studying activities between the model and no-model condition conductors, with more time spent in gesturing when studying along with a model. Evaluations of participants’ conducting revealed no differences between those conductors who used a model and those who did not while studying Portrait of a Clown. Our analysis of conductors’ score markings revealed a small number of notable differences between stronger/weaker conductors and between model/no-model conditions. Implications for undergraduate conductor preparation programs are discussed.
BattistiF. L.GarafoloR. (1990). Guide to score study for the wind band conductor. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music Publications.
2.
BattistiF.GarofaloR. J. (1993). Suggestions for marking the score. In Conductors anthology (Vol. 2, pp. 279–282). Northfield, IL: Instrumentalist Company.
3.
BerlinerD. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X015007007
4.
BorkoH.LivingstonC. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473
5.
CaseyJ. L. (1993). Teaching techniques and insights for instrumental music educators. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
6.
CashC. D.AllenS. E.SimmonsA. L.DukeR. A. (2014). Effects of model performances on music skill acquisition and overnight memory consolidation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022429413520409
7.
ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B.ZatorreR. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2844–2854. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn042
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
ColwellR. J.HewittM. P. (2011). The teaching of instrumental music (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
10.
CroweD. R. (1996). Effects of score study style on beginning conductors’ error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 160–171. doi:10.2307/3345668
11.
D’AusilioA. (2007). The role of the mirror system in mapping complex sounds into actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5847–5848. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0979-07.2007
12.
DealJ. J.BoydJ.DoaneC.HaithcockM.JohnsonD.JohnsonK.. . . RichterG. (1985, February). Report of the CBDNA research committee on undergraduate conducting. Paper presented at the 23rd National Conference of the College Band Directors National Convention, Boulder, CO.
13.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much: it’s how Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
14.
DukeR. A.StammenD. (2011). Scribe (Version 4.2) [Computer software]. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Music Learning.
15.
EllisB. L. (1994). Selected band conductors’ preparation to conduct selected band compositions.Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-09A, 2626.
16.
FeldmanE.ContziusA.LutchM. (2016). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
ForsytheJ. L.WoodsJ. R. (1983). The effects of conducting on the error detection ability of undergraduate and graduate instrumental conductors. Contributions to Music Education, 10, 27–31.
18.
GreenE. A. H.GibsonM. (2004). The modern conductor (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
19.
GrunowR. F. (1980). An investigation of the relative effectiveness of four modes of score preparation on visual-aural discrimination skills development.Dissertation Abstract International, 41-02A, 1861.
20.
HenleyP. (2001). Effects of modeling and tempo patterns as practice techniques on the performance of high school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 169–180. doi:10.2307/3345868
21.
HewittM. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 307–322. doi:10.2307/3345614
22.
HochkeppelW. J. (1993). Systematic score study: Effects of four methodologies of error detection achievement in instrumental conducting students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54-08A, 2937.
23.
HopkinsJ. E. (1991). The effect of four approaches to score study on student conductors’ ability to detect errors in the performance of choral music. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-11A, 3854.
24.
HunsbergerD.ErnstR. (1992). The art of conducting. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
25.
JordanJ. (2008). Evoking sound: The choral rehearsal: Inward bound, philosophy and score preparation (Vol. 2). Chicago, IL:GIA Publications.
26.
KearnsR. E. (2011). Quick reference for band directors. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
LahavA.SaltzmanE.SchlaugG. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308–314. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-06.2007
29.
LaneJ. (2006). Undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ approach to score study in various musical contexts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 215–230. doi:10.1177/002242940605400305
30.
ManfredoJ. (2008). Factors influencing curricular content for undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 175, 45–62.
31.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 254–266. doi:10.1177/0022429412455201
32.
MontemayorM.MossE. A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 236–251. doi:10.1177/0022429409343183
33.
MorrisonS. J. (2002). The use of recorded models in the instrumental rehearsal: Effects on ensemble achievement. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 21–26. doi:10.1177/875512330202000206
34.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
35.
RominesF. D. (2003). A survey of undergraduate instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Band Research, 38(2), 80–90.
36.
SchlegelA. L. (2010). The effect of directed attention score study procedures on music majors’ error detection in three-part instrumental music (Doctoral dissertation). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
37.
SilveyB. A. (2011a). Effects of score study on novices’ conducting and rehearsing: A preliminary investigation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 187, 33–48.
38.
SilveyB. A. (2011b). Undergraduate music majors’ perceptions of instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 27–38. doi:10.1177/1057083710387521
39.
SilveyB. A.BaumgartnerC. (2016). Effects of nonverbal, verbal, and mixed rehearsal methods on ratings of conductor effectiveness and ensemble expressivity. Journal of Band Research, 51(2), 30–45.
40.
SilveyB. A.MontemayorM. (2014). The effects of internal and external focus of attention on novices’ conducting and rehearsal evaluations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 161–174. doi:10.1177/0022429414530434
41.
SilveyB. A.SpringerG.EubanksS. (2016). An examination of university conducting faculty members’ score study attitudes and practices. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26, 82–95. doi:10.1177/1057083715616442.
42.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
43.
ToneyH.Jr. (2000). Expressive ensemble conducting and performing: A qualitative case study of one conductor’s practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
44.
WagarJ. (1991). Conductors in conversation. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall & Co.
45.
WhitakerJ. A.OrmanE. K.YarbroughC. (2014). Characteristics of “music education” videos posted on YouTube. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(1), 49–56. doi:10.1177/8755123314540662
46.
WineT. R. (1995). Approaches to score marking by undergraduate and graduate choral conducting students. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 53–56.
47.
ZirkmanR. A. (1984). Review of educational objectives for conducting classes for the undergraduate through the doctoral degree (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 8423047)
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
