The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of score study and conducting gesture on collegiate musicians’ ability to detect errors in a choral score. Is there a combined effect of gesture and score study that impacts undergraduate conductors’ identification of errors in a score? Participants (N = 53) viewed a sequence of four choral score excerpts presented via Zoom video conferencing. We asked participants to identify errors under one of four conditions: score study with a correct model recording, conducting with a simple timekeeping pattern while listening, both score study and conducting, or neither. After listening to each excerpt, participants notified the researcher about the exact location, voice part, and error type of any error that they heard. There were significant differences among conditions, with post hoc tests indicating superior error detection scores for the score study conditions. Conducting during the error detection task resulted in lower error detection scores, especially when not preceded by score study with a correct aural model.
BattistiF. L.GarofaloR. (1990). Guide to score study for the wind band conductor. Meredith Music.
2.
BlancaM. J.AlarcónR.ArnauJ.BonoR.BendayanR. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?Psicothema, 29(4), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
3.
BlocherL. R. (1986). An analysis of college band instrumentalists’ detection of common performance errors (Publication No. 8708160) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
4.
BodnarE. N. (2017). The effect of intentional, preplanned movement on novice conductors’ gesture. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(3), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083716644651
5.
ByoJ. L. (1993). The influence of textural and timbral factors on the ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345405
6.
ByoJ. L. (1997). The effects of texture and number of parts on the ability of music majors to detect performance errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345465
7.
ByoJ. L.SheldonD. A. (2000). The effect of singing while listening on undergraduate music majors’ ability to detect pitch and rhythm errors. Journal of Band Research, 36(1), 26–46.
8.
ChaffinC. (2011). An examination of the cognitive workload associated with conducting in an instrumental music context: A review of literature. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.189.0073
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CroweD. R. (1996). Effects of score study style on beginning conductors’ error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345668
11.
de StwolinskiG.FaulconerJ.SchwarzkopfA. B. (1988). A comparison of two approaches to learning to detect harmonic alterations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345242
12.
DealJ. J. (1985). Computer-assisted instruction in pitch and rhythm error detection. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344803
13.
DeCarboN. J. (1982). The effects of conducting experience and programmed materials on error-detection scores of college conducting students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345085
14.
EllisB. L. (1994). Selected band conductors’ preparation to conduct selected band compositions (Publication No. 9503182) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
16.
FeldmanE.ContziusA.LutchM.BugajK. (2021). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony (3rd ed.). Routledge.
17.
ForsytheJ. L.WoodsJ. R. (1983). The effects of conducting on the error detection ability of undergraduate and graduate instrumental conductors. Contributions to Music Education, 10, 27–32.
18.
HayslettD. J. (1992). The effect of directed focus on the peripheral hearing of undergraduate instrumental music majors [Paper presentation]. National Biennial In-Service Conference of the Music Educators National Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA.
19.
HopkinsJ. E. (1991). The effect of four approaches to score study on student conductors’ ability to detect errors in the performance of choral music (Publication No. 9210841) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
20.
HuronD. (1989). Voice denumerability in polyphonic music of homogeneous timbres. Music Perception, 6(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285438
21.
KillianJ. N. (1991). The relationship between sightsinging accuracy and error detection in junior high singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344721
22.
LabutaJ. A.MatthewsW. K. (2018). Basic conducting techniques (7th ed.). Routledge.
23.
MaloneP. R. (1985). Development and evaluation of an approach to increasing pitch error detection skills in choral music education students (Publication No. 8602871) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
24.
MertlerC. A.Vannatta ReinhartR. A. (2017). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (6th ed.). Routledge.
25.
MontemayorM.MossE. A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409343183
26.
MontemayorM.SilveyB. A.AdamsA. L.WittK. L. (2016). Effects of internal and external focus of attention during novices’ instructional preparation on subsequent rehearsal behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415612201
27.
NapolesJ. (2012). The effect of lip synching on musicians’ ability to detect errors in a choral score. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 191, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.191.0081
28.
NapolesJ.BabbS. L.BowersJ.HankleS.ZrustA. (2017). The effect of piano playing on preservice teachers’ ability to detect errors in a choral score. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083716639724
29.
PaneyA. S.BuonviriN. O. (2014). Teaching melodic dictation in Advanced Placement Music Theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508411
30.
RamseyD. S. (1979). Programmed instruction using band literature to teach pitch and rhythm error detection to music education students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344966
31.
SchmiderE.ZieglerM.DanayE.BeyerL.BühnerM. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(4), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
32.
SheldonD. A. (1998). Effects of contextual sight-singing and aural skills training on error-detection abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(3), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345550
33.
SheldonD. A. (2004). Effects of multiple listenings on error-detection acuity in multivoice, multitimbral musical examples. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345433
34.
StambaughL. A.NicholsB. E. (2020). The relationships among interval identification, pitch error detection, and stimulus timbre by preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419885931
35.
StifflerB. D. (2004). The effects of conducting and non -conducting contexts on teacher self-evaluation and musical error detection (Publication No. 3131030) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
36.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2017). Recordings as learning and practising resources for performance: Exploring attitudes and behaviours of music students and professionals. Musicae Scientiae, 21(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916674048
37.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2021). Performers’ discourses on listening to recordings. Research Studies in Music Education, 43(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19899168
38.
WaggonerD. T. (2011). Effects of listening conditions, error types, and ensemble textures on error detection skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410396094
39.
WilliamsM. L. (2022). The effect of focus of attention on error detection ability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 69(4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429421997449
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
