Curricular integration has become an increasingly important component of many school reform initiatives, particularly at the elementary school level. Despite the important philosophical and political implications of this trend, there is relatively little literature on the impact of integrated curriculum for music learning and none dealing specifically with the implications of integrated curriculum on music teacher education. The purpose of this article is to review key issues surrounding the topic of integrated curriculum with special attention to implications for music teacher education. A one-way model in which music is used to reinforce content in other academic areas is what commonly passes for integration. A two-way integrated curriculum in which music and other subject areas are included and honored in a meaningful and appropriate manner provides a rich, comprehensive learning experience that can cross boundaries of culture and individual student differences, resulting in a productive and motivating experience for learners and yielding unique opportunities for teachers.
Andrews, B.W. (2006). Re-play: Re-assessing the effectiveness of an arts partnership in teacher education. Review of Education , 52, 443-459.
2.
Appel, M.P. (2006, November/December). Arts integration across the curriculum. Leadership, 14-17.
3.
Aschbacher, P. (1991). Humanitas: A thematic curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 16-19.
4.
Barry, N.H. (1998). Arts integration in the elementary classroom: Conference development and evaluation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 17(1), 3-8.
5.
Barry, N.H., Dell, C., Raiber, M.A., & Gunzenhauser, M.G. (2005). Oklahoma A+ Schools® research report year three (2004-2005). Edmond: University of Central Oklahoma, Oklahoma A+ Schools®.
6.
Barry, N.H., & Schons, S. (2005). Integrated curriculum and the music teacher: A case study. Contributions to Music Education, 31(2), 57-72.
7.
Berke, M. (2000). Curriculum integration: A two-way street. General Music Today, 14(1), 9-12.
8.
Bresler, L. (1994). Music in a double bind: Instruction by non-specialists in elementary schools. Arts Education Policy Review, 95(3), 30. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from Academic Search Premier database.
9.
Bresler, L. (1995). The subservient, co-equal, affective and social integration styles and their implications for the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(5), 31-37. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from Academic Search Premier database.
10.
Catterall, M.R., & Waldorf, L. (1999). Chicago arts partnerships in education summary evaluation (Champions of Change report). Washington, DC : Arts Education Partnership, the President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
11.
Corbett, D., Wilson, B., Noblit, G., & McKinney, M. (2001). The arts, identity, and comprehensive education reform: A final report from the evaluation of the A+ Schools Program. Winston-Salem, NC: Thomas S. Kenan Institute for the Arts.
12.
Dressel, P. (1958). The meaning and significance of integration. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), The integration of educational experiences: 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 3-25). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Edgerton, R. (1990). Survey feedback from secondary school teachers that are finishing their first year teaching from an integrated mathematics curriculum. Washington, DC: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED328419).
14.
Fiske, E. B. (Ed.). (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435581).
15.
Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school: How to integrate the curricula . Palatine, IL: Skylight.
16.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic Books.
17.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1995). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. In R. Fogarty (Ed.), Multiple intelligences: A collection (pp. 147-168). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
18.
Greene, L. (1991). Science-centered curriculum in elementary school . Educational Leadership, 49(2), 48-51.
19.
Humphreys, A., Post, T., & Ellis, A. (1981). Interdisciplinary methods: A thematic approach . Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
20.
Jacobs, H.H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
Lake, K. (1994). Integrated curriculum (School Improvement Research Series, Close-Up #16). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved May 16, 2002, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/8/c016.html
23.
MacIver, D. (1990). Meeting the need of young adolescents: Advisory groups, interdisciplinary teaching teams, and school transition programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(6), 458-465.
24.
Martorelli, D. (1992, October). Special report: Arts in action. Instructor, 38-45.
25.
McKean, B. (2000). Arts everyday: Classroom teachers' orientations toward arts education. Arts and Learning Research, 16(1), 177-194.
26.
Mills, S.W. (2001). The role of musical intelligence in a multiple intelligences focused elementary school. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 2(4). Retrieved September 28, 2004, from http://ijea.asu.edu/v2n4
27.
National Arts Education Consortium. (2002). Transforming education through the arts challenge: Final project report. Columbus, OH: Author.
28.
North Carolina Education and Law Project. ( 1996). The good North Carolina elementary school: Making the vision a reality for all children. Raleigh, NC: Author.
29.
Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., & Ky, K.N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.
30.
Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., & Ky, K.N. (1995). Listening to Mozart enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: Towards a neurophysiological basis. Neuroscience Letters, 185, 44-47.
31.
Scripp, L. (2000, Summer). Introduction: The premise of learning through music. Journal of Learning Through Music, 2-11.
32.
Shoemaker, B. (1989). Integrative education: A curriculum for the twenty-first century (Oregon School Study Council report 33/2). Eugene : University of Oregon.
33.
Smithrim, K., & Upitis, R. (2005). Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement . Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1-2), 109-127.
34.
Snyder, S. (1996). Integrate with integrity: Music across the elementary curriculum. WestNorwalk, CT: IDEAS Press.
35.
Steele, K.M., Bass, K.E., & Crook, M.D. (1999). The mystery of the Mozart Effect: Failure to replicate . Psychological Science, 10(4), 366-369.
36.
Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (Eds.). (2000). The arts and academic improvement: What the evidence shows [Special issue]. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4).
