The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions and attitudes of the Beverley Taylor Sorenson Arts Learning Program (BTSALP) arts specialists on arts integration. BTSALP arts specialists (N = 50) throughout the state of Utah responded to a 20-item survey. Results indicated that a majority of BTSALP arts specialists believe that arts integration serves as a support for both arts and nonarts subjects. BTSALP art specialists also indicated that teacher collaboration is essential for effective integration models; however, collaboration continues to be one of the greatest challenges. Also, results indicated a need for arts integration training for undergraduate preservice arts specialists. Open-ended response questions revealed the perceived benefits of arts integration as a positive impact on students both academically and socially. The limitations of arts integration identified were time constraints, the inability to “teach art for the sake of art,” and a lack support from both teachers and administrators.
AndrewsB. (2006). Re-play: Re-assessing the effectiveness of an arts partnership in teacher education. International Review of Education, 52, 443–459. doi:10.1007/s1159-006-9003-2
2.
BarrettJ. R. (2001). Interdisciplinary work and musical integrity. Music Educators Journal, 87(5), 27–31. doi:10.2307/3399705
3.
BarrettJ. R.McCoyC.VeblenK. (1997). Sound ways of knowing: Music in the interdisciplinary classroom. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
BattersbyS.CaveA. (2014). Preservice classroom teachers’ preconceived attitudes, confidence, beliefs, and self-efficacy toward integrating music in the elementary curriculum. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 52–59. doi:10.1177/8755123314521033
5.
BerkeM. K. (2000). Curriculum integration: A two-way street. General Music Today, 14(1), 9–12. doi:10.1177/104837130001400104
6.
BerkeM. K.ColwellC. M. (2004). Integration of music in the elementary curriculum: Perceptions of pre-service elementary education majors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 22–33. doi:10.1177/87551233040230010104
7.
BohannonR. L.McDowellC. (2010). Art, music, and movement connections for elementary education teacher candidates. General Music Today, 24(1), 27–31. doi:10.1177/1048371310361675
8.
BreslerL. (1995). The subservient, co-equal, affective, and social integration styles and their implications for the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(5), 31–37. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ515409
9.
BurnafordG. (1993). The challenges of integrated curricula. Music Educators Journal, 79(9), 44–47. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ475071
10.
BurnafordG.BrownS.DohertyJ.McLaughlinH. (2007). Arts integration frameworks, research, and practice: A literature review. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
11.
CaneS. (2009). Collaboration with music: A noteworthy endeavor. Music Educators Journal, 96(1), 33–39. doi:10.1177/0027432109341165
12.
CatterallJ. S. (2002). The arts and the transfer of learning. In DeasyR.(Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 151–157). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
13.
ColwellC. M. (2008). Integration of music and core academic objectives in the K-12 curriculum: Perceptions of music and classroom teachers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 26(2), 33–41. doi:10.1177/8755123308317954
14.
CornettC. E. (2006). Center stage: Arts-based read alouds. The Reading Teacher, 60, 234–240. doi:10.1598/RT.60.3.3
15.
CornettC. E. (2007). Creating meaning through literature and the arts: An integration resource for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
16.
CosenzaG. (2005). Implications for music educators of an interdisciplinary curriculum. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 6(9). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v6n9/v6n9.pdf
17.
DeasyR. J. (Ed.). (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
18.
FisherD.McDonaldN. (2004). Stormy weather: Leading purposeful curriculum integration with and through the arts. Teaching Artist Journal, 2, 240–248. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ939775
19.
FiskeE. (Ed.). (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
20.
GarrettJ. (2010). Arts integration professional development: Teacher perspective and transfer to instructional practice. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3402414)
21.
IrwinR.GouzouasisP.GrauerK.LeggoC. (2006, March). Investigating curriculum integration, the arts and diverse learning environment. Paper presented at the United Nationals Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Congress on Arts Education, Lisbon, Portugal.
22.
JeanneretN. (1997). Model for developing preservice primary teachers’ confidence to teach music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 37–44. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40318837
23.
KrugD. H.Cohen-EvronN. (2000). Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41, 258–275. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1320380
24.
MasonT. C. (1996). Integrated curricula: Potential and problems. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 263–270. doi:10.1177/088840640803100104
25.
MayB. (2012). Arts integration: What’s the problem?General Music Today, 26(2), 5–8. doi:10.1177/1048371312464374
26.
OreckB. (2006). Artistic choices: A study of teachers who use the arts in the classroom. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 7(8), 1–26.
President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities. (2011, May). Reinvesting in arts education: Winning America’s future through creative schools. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.pcah.gov/
29.
RorrerA. K.GrothC. (2009). Beverley Taylor Sorenson Arts Learning Program year 1 implementation evaluation interim report 2008-2009: Executive summary. Salt Lake City: Utah Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://uepc.utah.edu/_documents/executive-summary.pdf
30.
RorrerA. K.GrothC.YoonI.ShooterW.SwensonK.RaphaelR. (2011). Beverley Taylor Sorenson Arts Learning Program year 3 implementation evaluation 2010-2011: Technical report. Salt Lake City: Utah Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://uepc.utah.edu/_documents/BTSALP-Year3.pdf
31.
RuppertS. (2006). Critical evidence: How the arts benefit student achievement. Washington, DC: National Assembly of State Arts Agencies. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529766.pdf
32.
ScrippL. (2000). Introduction: The premise of learning through music. Journal of Learning Through Music, Summer, 2–11. Retrieved from www.music-in-education.org/articles/1-B.pdf
33.
ShulerS. (2011). Music education for life: The three artistic processes—paths to lifelong 21st-century skills through music. Music Educators Journal, 97, 9–13. doi:10.1177/002743211409828
34.
SiebenalerD. (2006). Training teachers with little or no music background: Too little, too late?Application of Research in Music Education, 24, 14–22. doi:10.1177/87551233060240020102
SmithrimK.UpitisR. (2005). Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1/2), 109–127. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1602156
WhitakerN. L. (1996). Elusive connections: Music integration and the elementary classroom. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 130, 89–99. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40318814
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
