This study aimed to develop the “White Elephant Syndrome in Educational Administration Scale (WESEAS).” The WESEAS developed within the scope of the study consists of five subdimensions (Efficiency, Awareness, Waste, Planning, and Stakeholder) and 22 items. The reliability analysis of the scale was generally found to be “highly reliable” with a Cronbach Alpha coefficient of 0.815, and the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit values were good and acceptable. The WESEAS emphasizes the importance of efficient use of the scarce resources allocated to education and makes an important contribution to such measurement tools that are missing in the literature.
AbrahamJ.GeobeyS. (2022). Digital elixir?The Aakash tablet as a social innovation in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Social Enterprise Journal, 18(2), 288–305. 10.1108/SEJ-12-2020-0133
2.
AlmJ.SolbergH. A.StormR. K.JakobsenT. G. (2016). Hosting major sports events: The challenge of taming white elephants. Leisure Studies, 35(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.994550
3.
AltınH. M.KalelioğluF. (2015). Fatih projesi ile ilgili öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri. Başkent University Journal of Education, 2(1), 89–105.
4.
AyreC.ScalyA. J. (2014). Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development. Methods Playing Speaking, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
5.
BennettT. (2021). Sugata Mitra and the hole in the research. Nomanis, (11),32–33.
6.
BüyüköztürkŞ (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470–483.
7.
CanA. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Pegem Akademi.
8.
CarpenterS. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
9.
ÇavuşB. (2021). Resmi ve özel liselerde “yengeç sepeti” olgusu. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
10.
ChristensenB. L.JohnsonR. B.TurnerL. A. (2015). Research methods, design and analysis (12th ed.). Rearson Education Limited.
11.
ÇınkırŞ (2010). İlköğretim müdürlerinin sorunları: Sorun kaynakları ve destek stratejileri. İlköğretim Online, 9(3), 1027–1036.
12.
ÇoklukÖŞekercioğluG.BüyüköztürkŞ (2018). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (5. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
13.
ColeD. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage Publications.
15.
DavisJ. (2020). Avoiding white elephants? The planning and design of London’s 2012 Olympic and Paralympic venues, 2002–2018. Planning Perspectives, 35(5), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2019.1633948
16.
De MeloG.MachadoA.MirandaA. (2017). El impacto en el aprendizaje del programa Una Laptop por Niño: La evidencia de Uruguay. El Trimestre Económico, 84(334), 383–409. 10.20430/ete.v84i334.305
17.
GümüşE.ŞişmanM. (2014). Eğitim ekonomisi ve planlaması (2. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
18.
HairJ., Jr.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
19.
HanushekE. A.WoessmannL. (2020). Education, knowledge capital, and economic growth. The Economics of Education, 171–182.10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00014-8
20.
HarringtonD. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
21.
HayrullahoğluB. (2016). Kamusal beyaz fil sendromu ve türkiye’de kamusal beyaz fil tartışmaları. Içinde MayısR. P.DemirkilinçS. (Eds.), 2. Uluslararası Çin’den adriyatik’e sosyal bilimler kongresi (pp. 228–245). İktisadi Kalkınma ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Derneği Yayınları.
22.
HensonR. K.RobertsJ. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
23.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1998). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
24.
KaplanV. (2020). Beyaz fil sendromu. Içinde CemaloğluN. (Ed.), Sendromların eğitim ve yönetime yansımaları mitolojiden kurama (pp. 345–361). Pegem Akademi.
25.
KaraarslanE. (2005). Kamu kesimi eğitim harcamalarının analizi. Maliye Dergisi, 149(42), 36–73.
26.
KarasarN. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (26. Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
27.
KayacanM. A. (2022). Beyaz fil sendromu kapsamında EXPO 2016 Antalya. Içinde F.U. & H. B. (Eds.), İktisadi ve İdari bilimlerde güncel Çalışmalar (pp. 101–123). Palet Yayınları.
28.
KlineR. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. 10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
31.
McMahonW. W. (1980). Efficiency and equity criteria for educational budgeting and finance. BEBR Faculty Working Paper, No: 733.
32.
OECD (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
33.
OECD (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
34.
OECD (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
35.
PapanikolaouP. (2013). Athens 2004. Ten years later the Olympic infrastructure, the cultural olympiad and the “white elephant” syndrome. Journal of Power, Politics and Governance, 1(1), 1–9.
36.
PrasserS. (2007). Overcoming the “white elephant” syndrome in big and iconic projects in the public and private sectors. In Improving implementation: Organisational change and project management (pp. 47–67). Australian National University e-Press.
37.
ReimersF. M. (2021). Primary and secondary education during COVID-19: Disruptions and innovations. Springer
SchererR. F.LutherD. C.WiebeF. A.AdamsJ. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.763
40.
ŞekerN.ŞekerG. (2009). E-Devlet uygulamalarından İLSİS’ in okul yöneticileri tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(2), 11–19.
41.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
42.
TavşancılE. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayınları.
43.
TayL.JebbA. (2017). Scale Development. In RogelbergS. (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1381–1383). Sage.
44.
Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2025). Education statistics, 2024.
45.
UşunS. (2004). Bilgisayar destekli öğretimin temelleri. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
46.
World Bank(2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update.
47.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
48.
YanguasM. L. (2020). Technology and educational choices: Evidence from a one-laptop-per-child program. Economics of Education Review, 76, 101984. 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101984
49.
YıldırımK. (2023). Zorunlu öğretimde eğitimsel etkililik ve anne-babaların yaptığı eğitim yatırımlarının verimliliği. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 731–750. 10.18506/anemon. 1363594
