The Implementation of ETHNO-STEAM in Relation to the Traditional Musical Instrument Kacaping in Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills and Motivating the Preservation of Local Wisdom Among Students
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
The Implementation of ETHNO-STEAM in Relation to the Traditional Musical Instrument Kacaping in Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills and Motivating the Preservation of Local Wisdom Among Students
Ethno-STEAM is a combination of ethnosciences and STEAM. This research aims to describe Ethno-STEAM learning related to the traditional Kacaping musical instrument and to examine its influence on improving students’ problem-solving skills and motivation to preserve local wisdom. This study employs a quantitative approach, a quasi-experimental design, and a pretest-posttest control group design. The research consists of two classes: an experimental class receiving Ethno-STEAM treatment and a control class receiving conventional learning, each with 30 participants. Instruments used in this study include a Learning Implementation Questionnaire to assess the implementation of Ethno-STEAM learning, an essay test to assess participants’ problem-solving skills, and a non-test instrument to measure motivation to preserve local wisdom. The research results indicate that the implementation of Ethno-STEAM in relation to the traditional Kacaping instrument achieves an 81.25% rate, interpreted as “good.” The Independent Samples t-test showed a significant difference in problem-solving skill improvement between the classes (p < 0.05), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.64). Regarding the increase in motivation to preserve local wisdom, the Independent Samples t-test indicates a significant difference between the experimental and control classes (p < 0.05), with a Cohen's d of 0.70 (medium). Ethno-STEAM related to the traditional Kacaping instrument can enhance participants’ problem-solving skills and motivation to preserve local wisdom, compared to conventional learning.
AzisH.Yulkifli. (2021). Preliminary research in the development of smartphone-based e-module learning materials using the ethno-STEM approach in 21st century education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012054
2.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (BNSP). (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI. BNSP.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press.
4.
BedirH. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547718
5.
BurkeC.LuuR.LaiA.HsiaoV.CheungE.TamashiroD.AshcroftJ. (2020). Making STEM equitable: An active learning approach to closing the achievement gap. Learntechlib.Org, 5(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijal.v5i2.23933
6.
BybeeR. W. (2015). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press..
7.
CaenaF.RedeckerC. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European digital competence framework for educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
ChangD. F.ChangTzengH. C. (2020). Patterns of gender parity in the humanities and STEM programs: The trajectory under the expanded higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1550479
10.
ÇiftçiA.TopçuM. S.FoulkJ. A. (2022). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ views on STEM education and their STEM teaching practices. Research in Science and Technological Education, 40(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1784125
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2017). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Sage Publication.
12.
De GraaffE.KolmosA. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
13.
FaulconerE. K.WoodB.GriffithJ. C. (2020). Infusing humanities in STEM education: Student opinions of disciplinary connections in an introductory chemistry course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09819-7
14.
FungChak-HimPoonKin-KeungNgSiu-Ping (2022). Fostering student teachers’ 21st century skills by using flipped learning by teaching in STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2204. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12728
15.
González-salamancaJ. C.AgudeloO. L.SalinasJ. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366
16.
GraffinP.CareE. (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (methods and approach). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg..
17.
HadinugrahaningsihT.RahmawatIY.RidwanA.BudiningsihA.SuryaniE.NurlitianiA.FatimahC. (2017). Keterampilan abad 21 dan STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) project dalam pembelajaran kimia. LPPM Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
18.
HerroD.QuigleyC.CianH. (2019). The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
19.
HwangY.OhJ. (2021). The relationship between self-directed learning and problem-solving ability: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy and self-regulated learning among nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1738–1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041738
20.
IchsanI.SuharyatY.SantosaT. A.SatriaE. (2023). Effectiveness of STEM-based learning in teaching 21 st century skills in generation Z student in science learning: A meta-analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2517
21.
IhsanA. (2019). Nilai estetika kacaping sebagai konsep dasar pendidikan karakter pada pendidikan formal masyarakat bugis di kabupaten sidrap. Mudra; Jurnal Seni Budaya, 34(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v34i2.627
22.
KusasiM.FahmiF.SanjayaR. E.RiduanM.AnjaniN. (2021). Feasibility of STEM-based basic chemistry teaching materials to improve students’ science literature in the wetland context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2104(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2104/1/012022
23.
LeyvaL. A.McNeillR. T.BalmerB. R.MarshallB. L.KingV. E.AlleyZ. D. (2022). Black queer Students’ counter-stories of invisibility in undergraduate STEM as a white, cisheteropatriarchal space. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 863–904. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221096455
24.
LiaoC.MotterJ. L.PattonR. M. (2016). Tech-Savvy girls: Learning 21st-century skills through STEAM digital artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176492
25.
MacalalagA. Z.JohnsonJ.LaiM. (2020). How do we do this: Learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9
26.
MeltonJ. W.SaifulJ. A.SheinP. P. (2022). An interdisciplinary STEM program on authentic aerosol science research and students’ systems thinking approach in problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 44(9), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2080886
27.
MorrisonJ.FrostJ.GotchC.McDuffieA. R.AustinB.FrenchB. (2021). Teachers’ role in students’ learning at a project-based STEM high school: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1103–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10108-3
28.
MukaromahL.MustadiA.NisaA. (2022). Study of STEM based on local wisdom in hoening science process skills in the 21st century era. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1445
29.
MuttaqiinA.MurtianiM.YulkifliY. (2021). Is integrated science book with ethno-STEM approach needed by secondary school students?Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012048
PerdanaR.AprianiA. N.RichardoR.RochaendiE.KusumaC. (2021). Elementary students’ attitudes towards STEM and 21st-century skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 1080–1088.
32.
RamdaniA.JufriA. W.GunawanG.FahrurroziM.YustiqvarM. (2021). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5e learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956
33.
ReffianeF.SudarminW.SaptonoS. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess students’ problem-solving ability on hybrid learning model using Ethno-STEM approach through quest program. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 11(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.01
34.
RomadhanM. I. (2019). Proses komunikasi dalam pelestarian budaya saronen kepada generasi muda. Jurnal PIKOM (Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan), 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31346/jpikom.v20i1.1650
35.
SamraA.RatnawulanR.GusnediG. (2019). Analysis of teachers need in developing integrated science text book IPA adaptation system human body to temperature change using integrated 21st century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012099
36.
SaygılıE. (2017). Examining the problem solving skills and the strategies used by high school students in solving non-routine problems. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 91–114. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/338828
37.
SchererR.TiemannR. (2014). Evidence on the effects of task interactivity and grade level on thinking skills involved in complex problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.10.003
38.
SimamoraR. E.SaragihS.HasratuddinH. (2018). Improving students’ mathematical students’ mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in local culture context. International Electronic Jour. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966
39.
StehleS. M.Peters-BurtonE. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
40.
SukmaA. H.SoepriyadiI.SoejarmintoY.PranawukirI. (2022). Edukasi dan penanaman semangat pelestarian seni gong si bolong pada komunitas pemuda depok. Indonesia Berdaya, 3(4), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022328
41.
Thornhill-MillerB.CamardaA.MercierM.BurkhardtJ. M.MorisseauT.Bourgeois-BougrineS.VinchonF.El HayekS.Augereau-LandaisM.MoureyF.FeybesseC.SundquistD.LubartT. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
42.
TresnawatiN.SalehI.SudarminWardaniS. (2021). Science batik ciwaringin: The implementation of ethno-stem pjbl model in learning biotechnology at pgsd students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012063
43.
ZainilM.KenediA. K.RahmatinaX. X.IndrawatiT.HandriantoC. (2023). The influence of a STEM-based digital classroom learning model and high-order thinking skills on the 21st-century skills of elementary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336
44.
ZayyinahZ.ErmanE.SupardiZ. A. I.HariyonoE.PrahaniB. K. (2022). STEAM-Integrated project based learning models: Alternative to improve 21st century skills. Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 627, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.039
45.
ZhangD.ShenJ. (2015). Disciplinary foundations for solving interdisciplinary scientific problems. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2555–2576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1085658
