First-generation college students (FGCSs) consistently demonstrate lower educational aspirations, academic achievement, and social capital compared to their peers. This study examined FGCSs’ challenges through a survey at a Midwestern public university. Using conventional content analysis of 93 students’ responses to open-ended questions, we explored their academic, social, and financial needs. Findings revealed that FGCSs struggled to navigate college resources and understand campus norms, showing less engagement with faculty resources, campus social life, and financial processes. We recommend stakeholder collaboration to empower FGCSs’ voices, implement faculty-peer-alumni mentorship programs, expand support networks, and provide targeted financial literacy workshops.
AlsuniZ.AlhubaishiA.OthmanG.AlghanemF.ZakariyahA.BardesiJ.RizkH. (2024). Understanding the struggles of first-generation medical students and interns: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Medicine and Life, 17(10), 934–939. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0310
AzmitiaM.Sumabat-EstradaG.CheongY.CovarrubiasR. (2018). “Dropping out is not an option”: How educationally resilient first-generation students see the future. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 160, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20240
4.
BañuelosM.FloresG. M. (2021). ‘I could see myself’: Professors’ influence in first-generation Latinx college students’ pathways into doctoral programs. Race Ethnicity and Education, 27(5), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1969906
5.
BarryL. M.HudleyC.KellyM.ChoS. J. (2009). Differences in self-reported disclosure of college experiences by first-generation college student status. Adolescence, 44(173), 55–68.
6.
BenavidesC. M.SidiqiM.Ruiz-MesaK.RiberaD. (2022). Supporting first generation Latinx freshmen: The importance of university resources, faculty, and peers. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(1), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2022.2141748
7.
BettingerE. (2015). Need-based aid and college persistence: The effects of the Ohio college opportunity grant. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(Suppl. 1), 102S–119S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715576072
BuiK. V. T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experiences. College Student Journal, 36(1), 3–12.
10.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4), 1023–1073. https://doi.org/10.1086/686643
11.
ChenJ. (2017). Nontraditional Adult Learners: The Neglected Diversity in Postsecondary Education. SAGE Open, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697161
12.
CheongY.GauvainM.PalbusaJ. A. (2019). Communication with friends and the academic adjustment of first- and non-first-generation students in the first year of college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(2), 1521025119834253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119834253
13.
CollierP. J.MorganD. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5
14.
DeckerD. M.DonaD. P.ChristensonS. L. (2007). Behaviorally at-risk African American students: The importance of student-teacher relationships for student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.004
15.
DemetriouC.MeeceJ.Eaker-RichD.PowellC. (2017). The activities, roles, and relationships of successful first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 58(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0001
16.
DuranA.DahlL. S.StipeckC.MayhewM. J. (2020). A critical quantitative analysis of students’ sense of belonging: Perspectives on race, generation status, and collegiate environments. Journal of College Student Development, 61(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0014
17.
DynarskiS. (2004). Who benefits from the education saving incentives? Income, educational expectations and the value of the 529 and Coverdell. National Tax Journal, 57(2.2), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.2S.01
18.
EvelandT. J. (2020). Supporting firstgeneration college students: Analyzing academic and social support's effects on academic performance. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1646891
FeiL.KangX.SunW.HuB. (2023). Global research trends and prospects on the first-generation college students from 2002 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1214216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214216
21.
FeustonJ. L.BrubakerJ. R. (2021). Putting tools in their place: The role of time and perspective in human-AI collaboration for qualitative analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 469, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479856
22.
FredricksJ. A.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.698
23.
GarciaL. D.PazC. C. (2009). Evaluation of summer bridge programs. About Campus, 14(4), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.299
24.
GibbonsM. M.RhinehartA.HardinE. (2019). How first-generation college students adjust to college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(4), 488–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116682035
25.
Gist-MackeyA. N.WileyM. L.ErbaJ. (2018). “You’re doing great. Keep doing what you’re doing”: Socially supportive communication during first-generation college students’ socialization. Communication Education, 67(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1390590
GofenA. (2009). Family capital: How first-generation higher education students break the intergenerational cycle. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 58(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00538.x
28.
Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121(6), 1762–1817. https://doi.org/10.1086/685442
29.
GrantP. D.RobertsJ. K. (2022). “You’re poor, so you’re not going to do anything:” socioeconomic status and capital accumulation as a means to access higher education for rural youth. Rural Sociology, 87(4), 1340–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12451
30.
GriffinK. A. (2020). Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate: Looking beyond the pipeline. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 277–349). Springer Nature.
31.
HaglerM. A.ChristensenK. M.RhodesJ. E. (2024). A longitudinal investigation of first-generation college Students’ mentoring relationships during their transition to higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 25(4), 791–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251211022741
32.
HoffmannM. D. (2019). Considerations for facilitating the development of peer mentoring relationships between athletes. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 10(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2018.1509164
33.
HoffmannM. D.LougheadT. M.BloomG. A. (2017). Examining the experiences of peer mentored athletes competing in elite sport. The Sport Psychologist, 31(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2016-0052
34.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732305276687
35.
HussainM.JonesJ. M. (2021). Discrimination, diversity, and sense of belonging: Experiences of students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000117
36.
IshitaniT. T. (2003). A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of Pre-college characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024284932709
37.
IvesJ.Castillo-MontoyaM. (2020). First-Generation college students as academic learners: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319899707
38.
JalaliM. S.AkhavanA. (2024). Integrating AI language models in qualitative research: Replicating interview data analysis with ChatGPT. System Dynamics Review, 40(3), e1772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1772
39.
JiangJ. A.WadeK.FieslerC.BrubakerJ. R. (2021). Supporting serendipity: Opportunities and challenges for human-AI collaboration in qualitative analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 94, 1–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449168
40.
KamerJ. A.IshitaniT. T. (2021). First-year, nontraditional student retention at four-year institutions: How predictors of attrition vary across time. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(3), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119858732
41.
KimA.-S.ChoiS.ParkS. (2020). Heterogeneity in first-generation college students influencing academic success and adjustment to higher education. The Social Science Journal, 57(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.002
42.
KuhG. D.CruceT. M.ShoupR.KinzieJ.GonyeaR. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
43.
LeeJ.MuellerJ. A. (2014). Student loan debt literacy: A comparison of first-generation and continuing-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 55(7), 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0074
44.
MahoneyJ. L.CairnsB. D.FarmerT. W. (2003). Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.409
45.
MarkleG. (2015). Factors influencing persistence among nontraditional university students. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615583085
46.
McClellandD. C. (1961). The achieving society. The Free Press.
47.
McClellandD. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. Irvington.
48.
McClellandD. C. (1985). Human motivation. Scott, Foresman.
49.
MeansD. R.PyneK. B. (2017). Finding my way: Perceptions of institutional support and belonging in low-income, first-generation, first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 58(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0071
50.
MitraS.ZhangY. (2021). Factors related to first-year retention rate in a public minority serving institution with nontraditional students. Journal of Education for Business, 97(5), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1951640
51.
MooreL. L. G.DustinK.RotterC. (2010). Using achievement motivation theory to explain student participation in a residential leadership learning community. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.12806/V9/I2/RF2
NeuertC.MeitingerK.BehrD.SchonlauM. (2021). The use of open-ended questions in surveys. Methods, Data, Analyses, 15(1), 3–6.
55.
NoraA.RendonL. I. (1990). Determinants of predisposition to transfer among community college students: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 31(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992310
PascarellaE. T.PiersonC. T.WolniakG. C.TerenziniP. T. (2004). First-generation college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
58.
PhillipsL. T.StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.GoudeauS. (2020). Access is not enough: Cultural mismatch persists to limit first-generation students’ opportunities for achievement throughout college. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1112–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000234
59.
PrósperoM.Vohra-GuptaS. (2007). First generation college students: Motivation, integration, and academic achievement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(12), 963–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920600902051
60.
QuL.ShaoJ.BaiY.LiuH. (2023). Cultural reproduction or cultural mobility: The influence of individual characteristics and student engagement on academic achievement of the first generation college students in Chinese research university. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102119
61.
RoyleM. T.HallA. T. (2012). The relationship between McClelland’s theory of needs, feeling individually accountable, and informal accountability for others. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 5(1), 21–42.
62.
RybnicekR.BergnerS.GutschelhoferA. (2019). How individual needs influence motivation effects: A neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 443–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0252-1
63.
SoriaK. M.StebletonM. J. (2012). First-generation students’ academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666735
64.
StebletonM. J.SoriaK. M.HuesmanR. L.Jr. (2014). First-generation students’ sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. Journal of College Counseling, 17(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x
65.
StrayhornT. L. (2011). Bridging the pipeline: Increasing underrepresented students’ preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210381871
66.
StrayhornT. L. (2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students (2nd ed.). Routledge.
67.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP. M.PascarellaE. T.NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680039
68.
TibbettsY.PriniskiS.HechtC. A.BormanG. D.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2018). Different institutions and different values: Exploring first-generation student fit at 2-year colleges. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00502
69.
WachingerJ.BärnighausenK.SchäferL. N.ScottK.McMahonS. A. (2024). Prompts, pearls, imperfections: Comparing chatGPT and a human researcher in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241244669
70.
WebberK. L.KrylowR. B.ZhangQ. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090
71.
YouJ. W. (2020). The relationship between participation in extracurricular activities, interaction, satisfaction with academic major, and career motivation. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318802108
