The Covid-19 pandemic caused the California State University system to shift completely to online learning in March 2020. Before the end of the spring 2020 semester the CSU system announced that Fall 2020, and then Spring 2021 courses would be delivered online. During the summer of 2020 online training courses are available to all Faculty and instructors to prepare for online delivery. The courses were developed by curriculum designers and delivered by volunteer faculty with both expertise and comfort in online instruction. At one of the schools in the CSU system 800 instructors signed up to take the course. The purpose of this paper is to understand how faculty implemented teaching practices online after participating in the training provided by the participant university in the summer of 2020. Using the Universal Design for Learning framework for analysis; survey results, teaching strategies, and recommendations are included.
Al-AzaweiA.ParslowP.LundqvistK. (2017). The effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) application on e-learning acceptance: A structural equation model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2880
2.
Arnesen, K. T., Hveem, J., Short, C. R., West, R. E., & Barbour, M. K. (2019). K-12 online learning journal articles: Trends from two decades of scholarship. Distance Education, 40(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553566
3.
BremerC. D.ClapperA. T.HitchcockC.HallT.KachgalM. (2002). Universal Design: A Strategy To Support Students’ Access to the General Education Curriculum. Information Brief.
4.
BroadbentJ.PoonW. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
5.
BurgstahlerS. E.CoryR. C. (eds) (2013). Universal Design in Higher Education. Harvard Education Press.
CatalanoA. (2014). Improving distance education for students with special needs: A qualitative study of students’ experiences with an online library research course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1-2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.902416
9.
CoyK.MarinoM. T.SerianniB. (2014). Using universal design for learning in synchronous online instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900105
10.
CummingT. M.Draper RodríguezC. (2017). A meta-analysis of mobile technology supporting individuals with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917713983
11.
HitchcockC.MeyerA.RoseD.JacksonR. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203500201
KatzJ.SokalL. (2016). Universal design for learning as a bridge to inclusion: A qualitative report of student voices.International Journal of Whole Schooling, 12(2), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.146
14.
KezarA. (2011). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28, 4.
15.
KezarA. (2013). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. Routledge.
16.
King-SearsM. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 199–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740372
McGonigalJ. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin.
20.
MeyerA.RoseD. H. (2005). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. In RoseD. H.MeyerA.HitchcockC. (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies (pp. 13–35). Harvard Education Press.
21.
PiccianoA. G.SeamanJ.SheaP.SwanK. (2012). Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K-12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.004
22.
Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive instructional design: Applying UDL to online learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.59668/223.3753.
23.
RoseD. (2015). UDL-IRN Summit, A Fireside Chat with David Rose, Orlando, Florida.
24.
RoseD. H.HarbourW. S.JohnstonC. S.DaleyS. G.AbarbanellL. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 135–151.
25.
RoseD. H.MeyerA.HitchcockC. (eds) (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Harvard Educational Press.
Serdyukov, P., & Hill, R. (2013). Flying with clipped wings: Are students independent in online college classes. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 6(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.962
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
30.
ZinsJ. E.BloodworthM. R.WeissbergR. P.WalbergH. J. (2004). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. In ZinsJ. E.WeissbergR. P.WangM. C.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 3–22). Teachers College Press.
