Suitability of Online Higher Education for Learners with Disabilities: The Students’ Voices

Abstract

Online higher education has the potential to offer extra benefits for students with disabilities in comparison with campus-based universities, but it can also cause them some challenges. This case study addresses why students with disabilities choose online studies and how a fully online educational model fits their expectations and needs. Twenty-four students living with physical, sensory, mental, and learning disabilities participated in semi-structured interviews from which we identified six main themes: flexibility, accessibility, curricular design, online interaction, online collaboration, and psycho-emotional wellbeing. These students find online studies flexible, accessible, and helpful for their psycho-emotional wellbeing, but still challenging for interacting and collaborating. Our findings emphasize the importance of applying the Universal Instructional Design for Online Learning in combination with the Universal Design for Learning principles to enhance the inclusion of students with diverse profiles in online learning, as well as offering personalized support for those with severe or multiple disabilities.

Keywords

college students inclusive education online learning universal design for learning universal instructional design learners with disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alamri

Tyler-Wood

(2017). Factors affecting learners with disabilities–instructor interaction in online learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681497

Batanero

de-Marcos

Holvikivi

Hilera

J. R.

Otón

(2019). Effects of new supportive technologies for blind and deaf engineering students in online learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2899545

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun

Clarke

Rance

(2015). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In Vossler

Moller

(Eds.), The counselling and psychotherapy research handbook (pp. 183–197). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473909847.n13

Burgstahler

(2015). Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities. Social Inclusion, 3(6), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i6.420

Burgstahler

(2016). The development of accessibility indicators for distance learning programs. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 14(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760500479753

Capdeferro

Romero

(2012). are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127

Catalano

(2014). improving distance education for students with special needs: A qualitative study of students’ experiences with an online library research course. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.902416

Edwards

(2019). Inclusive learning and teaching for Australian online university students with disability: A literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(5), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1698066

10.

Elias

(2010). Universal instructional design principles for Moodle. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.869

11.

Fichten

Olenik-Shemesh

Asuncion

Jorgensen

Colwell

(2020). Higher education, information and communication technologies and students with disabilities: An overview of the current situation. In Seale

(Ed.), Improving accessible digital practices in higher education: Challenges and new practices for inclusion (pp. 21–44). Cham: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_2

12.

Gehret

A. U.

Elliot

L. B.

MacDonald

J. H. C.

(2017). Active collaborative learning through remote tutoring: A case study with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681162

13.

Keane

Russell

(2014). Using cloud collaboration for writing assignments by students with disabilities: A case study using action research. Open Praxis, 6(1), 55–63. https://www.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.935999861353365

14.

Kember

Trimble

Fan

(2022). An investigation of the forms of support needed to promote the retention and success of online students. American Journal of Distance Education, 1–16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2061235

15.

Kent

(2015). Disability and Elearning: Opportunities and barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v35i1.3815

16.

Kent

(2016). Access and barriers to online education for people with disabilities (pp. 1–168) [Report]. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/55588

17.

Kent

Ellis

Giles

(2018). Students with disabilities and elearning in Australia: Experiences of accessibility and disclosure at Curtin University. TechTrends, 62(6), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y

18.

Kirkpatrick

Connor

Campbell

Cooper

(2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

19.

Kocdar

Bozkurt

(2022). Supporting learners with special needs in open, distance, and digital education. In Zawacky-Richter

Jung

(Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1–16). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_49-1

20.

Kotera

Cockerill

Green

Hutchinson

Shaw

Bowskill

(2019). Towards another kind of borderlessness: Online students with disabilities. Distance Education, 40(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600369

21.

Lee

(2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education, 33(2017), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001

22.

Ley General de derechos de las personas con discapacidad y de su inclusión social [ General Law on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and their Social Inclusion ], Pub. L. No. Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2013, 289 BOE-A-2013-12632 (2013). https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-12632#ddunica

23.

Lowenthal

P. R.

Humphrey

Conley

Dunlap

J. C.

Greear

Lowenthal

Giacumo

L. A.

(2020). Creating accessible and inclusive online learning: Moving beyond compliance and broadening the discussion. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(2), 1–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288511

24.

McManus

Dryer

Henning

(2017). Barriers to learning online experienced by students with a mental health disability. Distance Education, 38(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369348

25.

Murphy

Malenczak

Ghajar

(2019). Identifying challenges and benefits of online education for students with a psychiatric disability. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 32(4), 395–409. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247112

26.

Lee

S. M.

(2016). The effects of online interactions on the relationship between learning-related anxiety and intention to persist among e-learning students with visual impairment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2581

27.

Rao

Torres

Smith

S. J.

(2021). Digital tools and UDL-based instructional strategies to support students with disabilities online. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421998327

28.

Reyes

J. I.

Meneses

(2022) (In press). Advising college students with dis/abilities in online learning. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2121264

29.

Reyes

J. I.

Meneses

Melián

(2022). A systematic review of academic interventions for students with disabilities in Online Higher Education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(4), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1911525

30.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(2016). Face-to-face versus online tutorial support in distance education: Preference, performance, and pass rates in students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 83–90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107475

31.

Roberts

J. B.

Crittenden

L. A.

Crittenden

J. C.

(2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: A cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.004

32.

Rodrigo

Tabuenca

(2020). Learning ecologies in online students with disabilities. Comunicar, 28(62), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-05

33.

She

Martin

(2022). Systematic review (2000 to 2021) of online accessibility research in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2081438

34.

Singleton

Evmenova

Jerome

M. K.

Clark

(2019). Integrating UDL strategies into the online course development process: Instructional designers’ perspectives. Online Learning, 23(1), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1407

35.

Verdinelli

Kutner

(2016). Persistence factors among online graduate students with disabilities. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039791

36.

Westbrook

(2012). Online collaborative learning in health care education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1(2012), 1–6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ979596

37.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed., No. 1, p. 219). CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.