Despite attempts at gender equality in Western countries, male dominance persists. Gender-based violence (such as sexual harassment, abuse, rapes, homophobic attacks, revenge pornography, and gender-motivated murders) is in the spotlight as part of the larger phenomenon of sexism. Sexism combines a total of stereotypes that contribute (explicitly or implicitly) to the reproduction of discrimination based on gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation and are reflected in language use, attitudes, and practices that can lead individuals or groups to social exclusion. To detect and question sexism, we believe that the role of critical education is crucial. Thus, the aim of our study is to develop indicative critical language proposals following the multiliteracies model. This material is intended to enable students’ critical literacy to become aware of the (subtle) normative assumptions around gender and sexuality and critically reflect on the essentialist opposition between masculinity and femininity.
ArchakisA.TsakonaV. (2011). Ταυτότητες, αφηγήσεις και γλωσσική εκπαίδευση [Identities, narratives, and language education]. Patakis Publications.
4.
AssimakopoulosS.SerafisD. (2020). Ρητορική και λόγος μίσους: Ομοφοβικές τάσεις σε σχόλια αναγνωστών στο διαδίκτυο [Hate rhetoric and hate speech: Homophobic tendencies in online news portal comments]. In BoukalaS.StamouA. (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: (de)constructing Greek reality (pp. 589–621). Nissos.
5.
BandelliD. (2017). Femicide, gender and violence: Discourses and counterdiscourses in Italy. Palgrave MacMillan.
6.
BaynhamM. (1995). Literacy practices: Investigating literacy in social contexts. Longman.
7.
BeckA. S. (2005). A place for critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(5), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.5.3
8.
BurtonC. (2020). Gender disrupted during storytime: Critical literacy in early childhood. Journal of Childhood Studies, 45(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs00018978
9.
ChardaliaN.IoannidouA. (2008). Έμφυλες κοινωνικές αναπαραστάσεις στα σχολικά εγχειρίδια: Μελέτη βιβλιογραφικής επισκόπησης [Gender social representations in the school textbooks: Bibliographic overview study]. Research Center for Gender Equality (KETHI).
10.
ConnellR. W. (2005). Gender. Polity Press.
11.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB.JozefowiczD. (1999). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In SwannW. B.LangloisJ. H.GilbertL. Albino (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153–192). American Psychological Association.
15.
EisendM.PlagemannJ.SollwedelJ. (2014). Gender roles and humor in advertising: The occurrence of stereotyping in humorous and nonhumorous advertising and its consequences for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.857621
FaircloughN. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
18.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
19.
FreischlagJ. A.FariaP. (2018). It is time for women (and men) to be brave: A consequence of the #MeToo movement. JAMA, 319(17), 1761–1762. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.4059
20.
GeorgalidouΜ (2020). Πολιτικός/δημόσιος λόγος, γλωσσικός σεξισμός και το ζήτησμα της γλωσσικής ‘ορθότητας’ στην ελληνική πραγματικότητα [Political/public discourse, linguistic sexism, and the issue of linguistic “correctness” in Greek reality]. In BoukalaS.StamouA. (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: (de)constructing Greek reality (pp. 361–391). Nissos.
21.
HallM.HearnJ. (2019). Revenge pornography and manhood acts: A discourse analysis of perpetrators’ accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1417117
HolmesJ.MeyerhoffM. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Blackwell Publishing.
24.
HolmesJ.StubbeM. (2003). ‘Feminine’ workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In HolmesJ.MeyerhoffM. (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 573–599). Blackwell Publishing.
JohnsonS.EnsslinA. (2007). Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies. Continuum International Publishing Group.
27.
KalantzisM.CopeB. (2012a). Literacies. Cambridge University Press.
28.
KalantzisM.CopeB. (2012b). New learning: Elements of a science of education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
29.
KantartziΕ. (1996). Αγόρια και κορίτσια στο σχολείο. Οι στάσεις και οι αντιλήψεις των εκπαιδευτικών για το ρόλο των δυο φύλων [Boys and girls at school. Teachers’ attitudes and perceptions about the role of the two genders]. Modern Education88, 39–48. https://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/1105-3968/article/view/1903
30.
KeddieA. (2008). Playing the game: Critical literacy, gender justice and issues of masculinity. Gender and Education, 20(6), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250701829979
31.
KodžomanD. (2019). The psychology of clothing: Meaning of colors, body image and gender expression in fashion. Textile & Leather Review, 2(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.31881/TLR.2019.22
32.
KogidouD. (2012). Το σχολείο ως πολιτισμικό πλαίσιο κατασκευής έμφυλων ταυτοτήτων και ως ένα προνομιακό πεδίο για την άρση του σεξισμού [The school as a cultural framework for the construction of gender identities and as a privileged area for the elimination of sexism]. Paper presented at the Pedagogical Institute conference about “Education for Gender Equality”, Nicosia, Cyprus. https://www.pi.ac.cy/pi/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=734&Itemid=124&lang=el
33.
KogidouD. (2022). Πραγματικότητα και καθοδηγητικές αρχές για τη διασφάλιση μιας συμπεριληπτικής εκπαίδευσης [Gender and education: For an inclusive education free from violence and discrimination]. In ThanosTh.KogidouD. (Eds.), Xωρίς εκφοβισμό και διακρίσεις με βάση το φύλο, την ταυτότητα ή/και έκφραση φύλου και τον σεξουαλικό προσανατολισμό [Reality and guiding principles to ensure an inclusive education, free from bullying and discrimination based on gender, gender identity and/or expression and sexual orientation] (pp. 175–190). Tziolas Publications.
34.
KoutsogiannisD. (2011). Εφηβικές πρακτικές ψηφιακού γραμματισμού και ταυτότητες [Adolescent digital literacy practices and identities]. Center for the Greek Language.
35.
KoutsogiannisD. (2017). Γλωσσική διδασκαλία χθες, σήμερα, αύριο: Μια πολιτική προσέγγιση [Language teaching yesterday, today, tomorrow: A political perspective]. Institute of Modern Greek Studies (Manolis Triantafillidis Foundation).
36.
LazarM. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
37.
LeungR.WilliamsR. (2019). #Metoo and intersectionality: An examination of the #MeToo movement through the R. Kelly scandal. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 43(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919874138
38.
Makri-TsilipakouM. (2020). Έμφυλη (κοινωνιο)γλωσσική απαξίωση [Gendered (socio)linguistic devaluation]. In StagosP.CharamaraE. (Eds.), Gender inequalities and women rights in modern Greece (pp. 183–228). Centre οf the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki for European Legal Culture.
39.
MillsS. (2003). Caught between sexism, anti-sexism and ‘political correctness’: Feminist women’s negotiations with naming practices. Discourse and Society, 14(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014001931
40.
MillsS. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge University Press.
NutbeamM.MereichE. H. (2021). Negative attitudes and beliefs toward the #MeToo movement on twitter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15-16), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211001470
43.
PakulaŁPawelczykJ.SunderlandJ. (2015). Gender and sexuality in English language education: Focus on Poland. British Council.
44.
PetrakiG. (Ed.). (2020). Γυναικοκτονίες: Διαπιστώσεις, ερωτήματα και ερωτηματικά [Femicides: Ascertainments, questions and question marks]. Gutenberg.
45.
PuchnerL.MarkowitzL.HedleyM. (2015). Critical media literacy and gender: Teaching middle school students about gender stereotypes and occupations. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 7(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-7-2-3
46.
RogersR.SchaenenI. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in literacy education: A review of the literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.61
47.
RogersR.Trigos-CarrilloL. (2017). Intersecting intellectual trajectories: Multiliteracies and critical discourse analysis. In SerafiniF.GeeE. (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times (pp. 91–105). Teachers College Press.
48.
ScharrerE.KimD. D.LinK.LiuZ. (2006). Working hard or hardly working? Gender, humor, and the performance of domestic chores in television commercials. Mass Communication and Society, 9(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0902_5
49.
ShugartH. (2001). Parody as subversive performance: Denaturalizing gender and reconstituting desire in Ellen. Text and Performance Quarterly, 21(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930128124
TallericoM. (2000). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender, and color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021968886
52.
TentolourisF.ChatzissavvidisS. (2014). Λόγοι του κριτικού γραμματισμού και η “τοποθέτησή” τους στη σχολική πράξη: Προς μια γλωσσοδιδακτική αναστοχαστικότητα [Discourses of critical literacy and their “position” in the school praxis: Towards a language teaching reflexivity]. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 34(1), 411–421.
53.
TsamiV.KapogianniE.TsakonaV.ArchakisA. (2021). Το χιούμορ και η διδακτική του αξιοποίηση στο πλαίσιο του κριτικού γραμματισμού: Ανίχνευση των στάσεων των εκπαιδευτικών. [Humor and its teaching exploitation in the framework of critical literacy: Tracing teachers' stances]. In T. Markopoulos, C. Vlachos, A. Archakis, D. Papazachariou, I. G. Xydopoulos, & A. Roussou (Eds.),. Proceedings of the 14th international conference of Greek linguistics (pp. 13333–1346). University of Patras.
VannerC. (2022). Education about gender-based violence: Opportunities and obstacles in the Ontario secondary school curriculum. Gender and Education, 34(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1884193
56.
VasquezV. (2004). Creating opportunities for critical literacy with young children: Using everyday issues and everyday text. David Fulton Publishers.
57.
VasquezV.JanksH.ComberB. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093
58.
WallaceC. (2003). Critical Reading in language education. Palgrave MacMillan.
59.
Watson-GegeoK. A. (1997). Classroom ethnography. In HornbergerN. H.CorsonD. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, (vol. 8): Research methods in language and education (pp. 135–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_13.
