Neoliberal discourse dominated education policy for decades and fueled reform movements with lasting effects. Through a critical lens this qualitative case study explored policy direction, the influences that shaped multiple years of reform initiatives and the impact of these changes in one Canadian province. Data sources including policy documents, surveys, and interviews, revealed that with each restructuring there was a loss of professional expertise and local governance affecting working conditions, communication, and relationships. Consequently, there was a decline in support for student learning, teachers, and schools. This historical overview informs policymakers challenged with shaping future policy direction in education.
AppleM. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. InBurbulesN.TorresC. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp.57–77). Routledge.
2.
AppleM. (2010). Global crises and education. Routledge.
3.
AppleM.KenwayJ.SinghM. (2005). Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies, and politics. Peter Lang Inc.
4.
BallS. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Open University Press.
5.
BallS. J. (2008). The education debate: Policy and politics in the twenty-first century. Policy Press.
6.
BallS. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), 1046–1059.doi:10.1177/1478210316664259
7.
BlackmoreJ. (2000). Globalization: A useful concept for feminist rethinking theory and strategies in education. InBurbulesN.TorresC. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp.133–156). Routledge.
8.
BlackmoreJ.SachsJ. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders: Gender, educational restructuring, and organizational change. State University of New York Press.
9.
BurbulesN.TorresC. (2000). Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. Routledge.
10.
CollinsA.PhilpottD.FushellM.WakehamM. (2017). Now is the time: Report on the premier’s task force on improving educational outcomes. The Queen’s Printer.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
12.
DibbonD.SheppardB.BrownJ. (2011). The impact of education reform on school board governance. InGalwayG.DibbonD. (Eds.), Education reform: From rhetoric to reality (pp.211–230). The Althouse Press.
13.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.
14.
GalwayG.SheppardB.WiensJ.BrownJ. (2013). The impact of centralization on local school district governance in Canada. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 145.
15.
GerwirtzS. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. Open University Press.
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. (2004, Apr). Department of Education Minister announces location of headquarters and regional education centres for new school districts [News Release]. https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2004/edu/0430n03.htm
GreenM. G. (2014). Caring leadership in turbulent times: Tackling neoliberal reforms. Information Age Publishing.
28.
GreenM. G.TuckerJ. L. (2011). Tumultuous times of education reform: A critical reflection on caring in policy and practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(1), 1–19.doi:10.1080/13603124.2010.488701
29.
GunterH. M. (2001). Leaders and leadership in education. Paul Chapman Publishing.
30.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
TaylorS.RizviF.LingardB.HenryM. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. Routledge.
35.
WilliamsL.WarrenR. (1992). Our children, our future: Report of the royal commission of inquiry into the delivery of programs and services in primary, elementary, secondary education. The Queen’s Printer.
36.
WylieC. (2012). Vital connections: Why we need more than self-managing schools. NZCER Press.
37.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
