Economic Imperialism in Education Research: A Conceptual Review

Abstract

In this review, we explore economic imperialism, a concept that captures the phenomenon of a single discipline’s power over so many facets of social life and policy—including education. Through a systematic search, we examine how economic imperialism has been conceptualized and applied across fields. We uncovered three key, interconnected elements of economic imperialism that hold relevance for education research. First, economics has colonized other disciplines, narrowing the lens through which policymakers have designed education reforms. Second, an overreliance on economic rationales for human behavior neglects other explanations. Third, a focus on economic outcomes of education has subjugated other important aims of education. We share implications for researchers to use economic theory in ways that are interdisciplinary but not imperialist.

Keywords

economic imperialism education policy educational policy educational reform market-based reforms neoliberalism policy textual analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abreu

(2012). The new economics of labor migration: Beware of neoclassicals bearing gifts. Forum for Social Economics, 41(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-010-9077-2

Allais

(2012). “Economics imperialism,” education policy and educational theory. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.602428

Allais

(2014). Selling out education: National qualifications frameworks and the neglect of knowledge. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-578-6

Apple

M. W.

(2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. In Burbules

N. C.

Torres

C. A.

(Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57–78). Routledge.

Ferrare

J. J.

(2014). Sponsors of policy: A network analysis of wealthy elites, their affiliated philanthropies, and charter school reform in Washington State. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600805

Ayres

(1991). Evolutionary economics and environmental imperatives. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(05)80002-5

Bauman

Rose

(2011). Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 9(3), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.010

Becker

(1976). The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press.

Berman

E. P.

(2014). Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(3), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509123

10.

Blank

(2002). What do economists have to contribute to policy decision-making? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42(5), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00154-0

11.

Bowles

Gintis

(1976). Schooling in capitalist America. Routledge.

12.

Brubaker

(2013). Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of Muslims in European countries of immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.729674

13.

Buckley

P. J.

Casson

(1993). Economics as an imperialist social science. Human Relations, 46(9), 1035–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600902

14.

Casselman

Tankersley

(2020, June 10). Economics, dominated by White men, is roiled by Black Lives Matter. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/business/economy/white-economists-black-lives-matter.html

15.

Chafim

(2016). Disciplinary division within social sciences: Methodological issues in economic imperialism and economic pluralism. History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.19272/201606103007

16.

Chuah

(2006). Anthropology and economic imperialism: The battlefield of culture (NUBS Industrial Economics Division Working Paper). https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=722401

17.

Cooter

R. D.

(1981). Law and the imperialism of economics: An introduction to the economic analysis of law and a review of the major books. UCLA Law Review, 29, 1260–1268. https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1111675?ln=en

18.

Davis

J. B.

(2016). Economics imperialism versus multidisciplinarity. History of Economic Ideas, 24(3), 77–94. https://www.johnbryandavis.net/uploads/2/2/7/3/22734340/econ_imperialism.pdf

19.

Dequech

(2007). Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477300207

20.

Easton

Klees

(1990). Education and the economy. Prospects, 20(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02195115

21.

Ellison

(2014). Attack of the cyborgs: Economic imperialism and the human deficit in educational policy-making and research. Journal of Educational Controversy, 8(1), Article 7. https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1194&context=jec

22.

Ellison

Aloe

(2019). Strategic thinkers and positioned choices: Parental decision making in urban school choice. Educational Policy, 33(7), 1135–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818755470

23.

Etzioni

(2015). The moral effects of economic teaching. Sociological Forum, 30(1), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12153

24.

Falgueras-Sorauren

(2018) The convoluted influence of Robbins’s thinking on the emergence of economics imperialism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(5), 1473–1494. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey004

25.

Fine

(2002). “Economic imperialism”: A view from the periphery. Review of Radical Political Economics, 34(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661340203400205

26.

Fine

Milonakis

(2009). From economics imperialism to freakonomics: The shifting boundaries between economics and other social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880289

27.

Fourcade

(2009). Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833139

28.

Fourcade

Ollion

Algan

(2015). The superiority of economists. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 7, 45–72. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-7-45-72

29.

Francis

Gifty Opoku-Agyeman

(2020, June 11). Economists’ silence on racism is 100 years in the making. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/economists-silence-racism-100-years-making-opinion-1509790

30.

Frankenberg

Siegel-Hawley

Wang

(2011). Choice without equity: Charter School segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(1). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/epaa/article/view/779/878

31.

Gamble

(2020, June 9). How economic assumptions uphold racist systems. Dissent Magazine. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/how-economic-assumptions-uphold-racist-systems

32.

Gilead

(2015). Economics imperialism and the role of educational philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(7), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.914878

33.

Graça

Carlos Lopes

Gomes Correia

(2016). Economics education: Literacy or mind framing? Evidence from a survey on the social building of trust in Portugal. Analise Social, 51(220), 516–542.

34.

Griffen

Panofsky

(2021). Ambivalent economizations: The case of value added modeling in teacher evaluation. Theory and Society, 50, 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09417-x

35.

Grubb

W. N.

Lazerson

(2007). The education gospel: The economic power of schooling. Harvard University Press.

36.

Hirschman

Berman

E. P.

(2014). Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 779–811, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu017

37.

Hodgson

G. M.

(1994). Some remarks on “economic imperialism” and international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 21–28.

38.

Hyslop-Margison

Sears

(2006). Neoliberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic citizenship. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3422-9

39.

Jennings

J. L.

(2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710375688

40.

Kessaris

A. P.

(2011). Prepare your indicators: Economic imperialism on the shores of law and development. Law in Context, 7(4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174455231100022X

41.

Klaes

(2012). Paradigm “wars” as methodenstreit. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 20(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831211215632

42.

Klees

S. J.

(2017). The political economy of education and inequality: Reflections on Piketty. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(4), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2016.1195731

43.

Klees

S. J.

Stromquist

N. P.

Samoff

Vally

(2019) The 2018 World Development Report on Education: A critical analysis. Development and Change, 50(2), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12483

44.

Klonschinski

(2014). “Economic imperialism” in health care resource allocation: How can equity considerations be incorporated into economic evaluation? Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2014.906640

45.

Labaree

(1997). Public good, private goods: The American struggle over education goals. American Education Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001039

46.

Lawson

(2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei093

47.

Lazear

E. P.

(2000). Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99–146. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554683

48.

Lee

F. S.

(2012). Heterodox economics and its critics. Review of Political Economy, 24(2), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.664360

49.

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2020). Unregulated open enrollment and inequitable access to schools of choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(3), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1776072

50.

Lipman

(2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465509

51.

Livne

(2021). COVID, economized. Sociologica, 15(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11636

52.

Lubienski

Scott

Debray

E. H.

(2011). The rise of intermediary organizations in knowledge production, advocacy, and educational policy. Teachers College Record, 22, 1–3.

53.

Manic

(2016). Economics imperialism: SWOT analysis. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2016.6.3/102.3.151.161

54.

Marginson

(2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823

55.

Marglin

(2008). The dismal science: How thinking like and economist undermines community. Harvard University Press.

56.

Martin

(2006). Pentecostal conversion and the limits of the market metaphor. Exchange, 35(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1163/157254306776066951

57.

Menashy

Read

(2016). Knowledge banking in global education policy: A bibliometric analysis of World Bank publications on public-private partnerships. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(95), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2523

58.

Mirowski

(2014). The political movement that dared not speak its own name: The neoliberal thought collective under erasure (Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Papers No. 23). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682892

59.

Moeller

(2018) The gender effect: Capitalism, feminism, and the corporate politics of development. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520286382.001.0001

60.

Morson

G. S.

Schapiro

(2017). Cents and sensibility: What economics can learn from the humanities. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884841

61.

Nik-Khah

Van Horn

(2012). Inland empire: Economics imperialism as an imperative of Chicago neoliberalism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.714147

62.

Novelli

Higgins

Ugur

Valiente

(2014). The political economy of education systems in conflict-affected contexts: A rigorous literature review. Department for International Development. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/Political%20Economy%20Education%202014%20Novelli%20report.pdf?ver=2014-11-24-104035-650

63.

Oster

(2019). Cribsheet: A data-driven guide to better, more relaxed parenting, from birth to preschool. Penguin Press.

64.

Phillips

K. J. R.

Larsen

E. S.

Hausman

(2015). School choice and social stratification: How intra-district transfers shift the racial/ethnic and economic composition of schools. Social Science Research, 51(May), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.005

65.

Reay

(2012). What would a socially just education system look like? Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.710015

66.

Reckhow

(2012). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937738.001.0001

67.

Robertson

S. L.

(2009). Market multilateralism, the World Bank Group and the asymmetries of globalising higher education: Toward a critical political economy analysis. In Bassett

Maldonado-Maldonado

(Eds.), International organizations and higher education policy: Thinking globally, acting locally (pp. 113–131). Routledge.

68.

Rylko-Bauer

Farmer

(2002). Managed care or managed inequality? A call for critiques of market-based medicine. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 16(4), 476–502. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2002.16.4.476

69.

Satyapal

K. S.

(2005). Ethics, transplantation, and the changing role of anatomists. Clinical Anatomy, 18(2), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20066

70.

Scott

(2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808328531

71.

Sigelman

Goldfarb

(2012). The influence of economics on political science: By what pathway? Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.661067

72.

Silverman

J. S.

(1995). A new approach to health system reform: Seizing the moral high ground. Pennsylvania Medicine, 98(6), 28–30.

73.

Smelser

N. J.

(1992). The rational choice perspective: A theoretical assessment. Rationality and Society, 4(4), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463192004004003

74.

Stein

M. L.

(2015). Public school choice and racial sorting: An examination of charter schools in Indianapolis. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 597–627. https://doi.org/10.1086/681920

75.

Steiner

(1995). Economic sociology: A historical perspective. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719500000099

76.

Stuart

(2016). Out of place: Economic imperialisms in early childhood education. Education Philosophy and Theory, 48(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.971094

77.

Swedberg

(1987). European economic sociology, 1920s-1960s. Current Sociology, 35(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139287035001006

78.

Szuchman

Anderson

(2012). It’s not you, it’s the dishes: How to minimize conflict and maximize happiness in your relationship. Random House.

79.

Tan

(2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314532696

80.

Tompkins-Stange

(2016). Policy patrons: Philanthropy, education reform, and the politics of influence. Harvard Education Press.

81.

Verger

(2012) Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low–income contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623242

82.

Vromen

J. J.

(2009). The booming economics-made-fun genre: More than having fun, but less than economics imperialism. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 2(1), 70–99. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v2i1.25

83.

Zafirovski

(2000). The rational choice generalization of neoclassical economics reconsidered: Any theoretical legitimation for economic imperialism? Sociological Theory, 18(3), 448–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00111