The title of Coch and French’s influential article “Overcoming Resistance to Change” gave the term “resistance” a negative meaning and connotation that has been subsequently fostered by ongoing scholarship and practice regarding organizational change. In this article, we describe the understanding of resistance originally developed by Kurt Lewin, which had very different connotations for the term, and how Lewin's understanding was lost after his death. By reflecting on two publications by one of the authors that were based on an interpretive approach to organizational change and that did not need the term resistance, we show it is possible to interpret change agent initiatives and change recipient responses without using that label. Thus, we demonstrate how taking a revisionist history approach to a particular taken-for-granted construct salient to organizational change research can show how tenuous that construct actually is.
AnglesA. (1927). Restriction of output. Journal of the National Institute of Industrial Psychology, 3, 248–257.
2.
BartunekJ. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393029
3.
BartunekJ. M.MochM. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404
4.
BattilanaJ.CasciaroT. (2013). Overcoming resistance to organizational change: Strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Science, 59(4), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1583
5.
BecharaJ. P.Van De VenA. H. (2007). Philosophy of science underlying engaged scholarship. In Van De VenA. H. (Ed.), Engaged scholarship (pp. 36–70). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199226290.003.0002
6.
BeerM.WaltonE. (1990). Developing the competitive organization: Interventions and strategies. American Psychologist, 45(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.154
7.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (Repr). Anchor Books.
DentE. B.GoldbergS. G. (1999). Challenging “resistance to change”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399351003
13.
FordJ. D.FordL. W.D’AmelioA. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193235
HonA. H. Y.BloomM.CrantJ. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 919–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415418
17.
JohnsonB. A. (2023). Polarity thinking as a resource from the OD field for “systems change makers”. Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 50–62.
18.
KeysC. B.BartunekJ. M. (1979). Organization development in schools: Goal agreement, process skills, and diffusion of change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637901500106
19.
KleinD. (1967). Some notes on the dynamics of resistance to change: The defender role. In WatsonG. (Ed.), Concepts for social change (pp. 98–105). National Training Laboratories, NEA.
20.
KotterJ. P.SchlesingerL. A. (1979). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 106–114.
21.
LawrenceP. R. (1954). How to deal with resistance to change. Harvard Business Review, 32(2), 49–57.
22.
LewinK. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. In The problem of changing food habits: Report of the Committee on Food Habits 1941–1943 (pp. 35–65). National Research Council (US) Committee on Food Habits. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK224347/
23.
LewinK. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
24.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (edited by Dorwin Cartwright) (pp. xx, 346). Harpers.
25.
LewinK. (1999). Group decision and social change (M. Gold, Ed.). In M. Gold (Ed.), The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader (pp. 265–284). American Psychological Association. (Original work published 1948). https://doi.org/10.1037/10319-010
26.
NeisserU. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. Freeman.
27.
OregS. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
28.
OregS.BartunekJ. M.LeeG.DoB. (2018). An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0335
29.
PengJ.NieQ.ChengY. (2023). Team abusive supervision and team behavioral resistance to change: The roles of distrust in the supervisor and perceived frequency of change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(7), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2697
30.
PideritS. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.2307/259206
31.
RansonS.HiningsB.GreenwoodR. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392223
32.
WachtelP. L. (1999). Resistance as a problem for practice and theory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 9, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023262928748
33.
WansinkB. (2002). Changing eating habits on the home front: Lost lessons from World War II research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.90.17614
