The Power of Percipience: Consequences of Self-Awareness in Teams on Team-Level Functioning and Performance

Abstract

We integrate research on team functioning with that of self-awareness to advance the notion of self-awareness in teams as an important concept to consider when diagnosing team effectiveness. We argue that teams composed of individuals with greater levels of self-awareness will exhibit more effective team-level functioning and performance. This proposition was explored by examining the effects of self-other agreement with regard to individual-level contributions of teamwork behavior on three team-level functional outcomes (team coordination, conflict, cohesion) and team performance. Results from 515 teams (2,658 individuals) completing a high-fidelity team-based business simulation supported the effects of aggregate levels of self-awareness on team-level functioning and performance. Moreover, these effects were influential above and beyond individual contributions themselves, highlighting the unique value of team members’ self-awareness for understanding team functioning. Of the three functional outcomes, only team conflict mediated the effects of self-awareness in teams on subsequent team-level performance. Finally, results revealed that overrating among team members was a particularly problematic form of the lack of self-awareness in teams.

Keywords

teams groups/group processes/dynamics virtual teams

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashford

S. J.

1986. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 465-487.

Atwater

L. E.

Yammarino

F. J.

1992. Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45: 141-164.

Barrick

M. R.

Stewart

G. L.

Neubert

M. J.

Mount

M. K.

1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 377-391.

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497-529.

Beal

D. J.

Cohen

R. R.

Burke

M. J.

McLendon

C. L.

2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 989-1004.

Bell

S. T.

2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 595-615.

Bieri

1955. Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 263-268.

Bliese

P. D.

2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Buehler

Griffin

Ross

2002. Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions. In Gilovich

Griffin

Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment: 250-270. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Salas

Volpe

C. E.

1995. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In Guzzo

R. A.

Salas

(Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations: 333-380. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Capsim Management Simulations. 2014. TeamMATE Technical Synopsis. Chicago, IL: Author.

12.

Carron

A. V.

Brawley

L. R.

2012. Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 43: 726-743.

13.

Chan

1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234-246.

14.

Chiocchio

Essiembre

2009. Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research, 40: 382-420.

15.

Church

A. H.

1997. Managerial self-awareness in high-performing individuals in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 281-292.

16.

Colquitt

J. A.

LePine

J. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Zapata

C. P.

Rich

B. L.

2012. Explaining the justice-performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1-15.

17.

Colvin

C. R.

Block

Funder

D. C.

1995. Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 1152-1162.

18.

Connelly

B. S.

Ones

D. S.

2010. Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136: 1092-1122.

19.

Conway

J. M.

Huffcutt

A. I.

1997. Psychometric properties of multi-source performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10: 331-360.

20.

Cropanzano

Mitchell

M. S.

2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31: 874-900.

21.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

2010. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 32-53.

22.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

Doty

2013. Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 559.

23.

De Dreu

C. K

. 2006. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32: 83-107.

24.

De Dreu

C. K

. 2008. The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 5-18.

25.

De Dreu

C. K.

Weingart

L. R

. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 741-749.

26.

de Wit

F. R. C.

Greer

L. L.

Jehn

K. A

. 2012. The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 360-390.

27.

Dierdorff

E. C.

Bell

S. T.

Belohlav

J. A.

2011. The power of “we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 247-262.

28.

Dirks

K. T.

Ferrin

D. L.

2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611-628.

29.

Dunning

2012. Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. New York: Psychology Press.

30.

Dunning

Heath

Suls

2004. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5: 71-106.

31.

Edwards

J. R.

1994. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 51-100.

32.

Edwards

J. R.

Parry

M. E.

1993. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1577-1613.

33.

Edwards

J. R.

van Harrison

1993. Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 628-648.

34.

Ehrlinger

Dunning

2003. How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 5-17.

35.

Ehrlinger

Johnson

Banner

Dunning

Kruger

2008. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105: 98-121.

36.

Ellington

J. K.

Dierdorff

E. C.

2014. Individual learning in team training: Self-regulation and team context effects. Small Group Research, 45: 37-67.

37.

Ellis

A. P.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Ilgen

D. R.

Porter

C. O.

West

B. J.

Moon

2003. Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 821-835.

38.

Entin

E. E.

Serfaty

1999. Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41: 312-325.

39.

Festinger

1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7: 117-140.

40.

Fisher

D. M.

Bell

S. T.

Dierdorff

E. C.

Belohlav

J. A.

2012. Facet personality and surface-level diversity as team mental model antecedents: Implications for implicit coordination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 825-841.

41.

Fleenor

J. W.

Smither

J. W.

Atwater

L. E.

Braddy

P. W.

Sturm

R. E.

2010. Self-other rating agreement in leadership: A review. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 1005-1034.

42.

Fletcher

1997. Self-awareness—A neglected attribute in selection and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5: 183-187.

43.

Galinsky

A. D.

Wang

C. S.

2005. Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8: 109-124.

44.

Gordon

R. A.

1996. Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 54-70.

45.

Greer

L. L.

Caruso

H. M.

Jehn

K. A.

2011. The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116: 116-128.

46.

Harris

M. M.

Schaubroeck

1988. A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41: 43-62.

47.

Heidemeier

Moser

2009. Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 353-370.

48.

Heise

D. R.

1972. Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 1: 147-173.

49.

Higgins

C. A.

Judge

T. A.

Ferris

G. R.

2003. Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 89-106.

50.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Ilgen

D. R.

Sego

D. J.

Hedlund

Major

D. A.

Philips

1995. Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 292-316.

51.

Jehn

K. A.

1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.

52.

Jordan

A. H.

Audia

P. G.

2012. Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 37: 211-231.

53.

Jordan

P. J.

Ashkanasy

N. M.

2006. Emotional intelligence, emotional self-awareness, and team effectiveness. In Druskat

V. U.

Mount

Sala

(Eds.), Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with individuals and groups: 45-163. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

54.

Joseph

D. L.

Newman

D. A.

2010. Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 54-78.

55.

Kaplan

R. S.

Norton

D. P.

1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

56.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

1993. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 681-706.

57.

Klein

H. J.

1989. An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 150-172.

58.

Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W.

2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 211-236.

59.

Klimoski

Mohammed

1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20: 403-437.

60.

Korsgaard

M. A.

Meglino

B. M.

Lester

S. W.

2004. The effect of other orientation on self-supervisor rating agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 873-891.

61.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Chao

G. T.

2012. The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33: 335-354.

62.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Gully

S. M.

Nason

E. R.

Smith

E. M.

1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In Ilgen

D. R.

Pulakos

E. D.

(Eds.), The changing nature of work and performance: Implications for staffing personnel actions and development: 240-292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

63.

Kunda

1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 480-498.

64.

LePine

J. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Jackson

C. L.

Mathieu

J. E.

Saul

J. R.

2008. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61: 273-307.

65.

Liden

R. C.

Wayne

S. J.

Jaworski

R. A.

Bennett

2004. Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30: 285-304.

66.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.

67.

Marks

M. A.

Sabella

M. J.

Burke

C. S.

Zaccaro

S. J.

2002. The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 3-13.

68.

Mathieu

J. E.

Heffner

T. S.

Goodwin

G. F.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 273-283.

69.

Mathieu

J. E.

Maynard

M. T.

Rapp

Gilson

2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34: 410-476.

70.

Mathieu

J. E.

Rapp

T. L.

2009. Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 90-103.

71.

Mathieu

J. E.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Donsbach

J. S.

Alliger

G. M.

2014. A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40: 130-160.

72.

McGrath

J. E.

1964. Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

73.

Mezulis

A. H.

Abramson

L. Y.

Hyde

J. S.

Hankin

B. L.

2004. Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130: 711-747.

74.

Mohammed

Angell

L. C.

2004. Surface-and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 1015-1039.

75.

Mohammed

Ferzandi

Hamilton

2010. Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36: 876-910.

76.

Nguyen

N. T.

Seers

Hartman

N. S.

2008. Putting a good face on impression management: Team citizenship and team satisfaction. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9: 148-168.

77.

Ostroff

Atwater

L. E.

Feinberg

B. J.

2004. Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57: 333-375.

78.

Park

Spitzmuller

DeShon

R. P.

2013. Advancing our understanding of team motivation: Integrating conceptual approaches and content areas. Journal of Management, 39: 1339-1379.

79.

Pronin

Gilovich

Ross

2004. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111: 781-799.

80.

Rentsch

J. R.

Hall

R. J.

1994. Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In Beyerlein

M. M.

Johnson

D. A.

(Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1): 223-261. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

81.

Rentsch

J. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

2001. Why do “great minds” think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 107-120.

82.

Rentsch

J. R.

Small

E. E.

Hanges

P. J.

2008. Cognitions in organizations and teams: What is the meaning of cognitive similarity? In Smith

(Ed.), The people make the place: Exploring dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations: 127-155. New York: Psychology Press.

83.

Rentsch

J. R.

Woehr

D. J.

2004. Quantifying congruence in cognition: Social relations modeling and team member schema similarity. In Salas

Fiore

(Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance: 11-32. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

84.

Rentsch

J. R.

Zenlo

2003. The role of cognition in managing conflict to maximize team effectiveness: A team member schema similarity approach. In West

Smith

Tjosvold

(Eds.), International handbook of organization and cooperative teamworking: 131-150. West Sussex, England: Wiley.

85.

Richardson

D. R.

Hammock

G. S.

Smith

S. M.

Gardner

Signo

1994. Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20: 275-289.

86.

Rico

Sánchez-Manzanares

Gil

Gibson

2008. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33: 163-184.

87.

Robinson

R. J.

Keltner

Ward

Ross

1995. Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naive realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 404-417.

88.

Rousseau

Aube

Savoie

2006. Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37: 540-570.

89.

Saavedra

Kwun

S. K.

1993. Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 450-462.

90.

Salas

Sims

D. E.

Burke

C. S.

2005. Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36: 555-599.

91.

Sedikides

Herbst

K. C.

Hardin

D. P.

Dardis

G. J.

2002. Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 592-605.

92.

Shea

G. P.

Guzzo

R. A.

1989. Groups as human resources. In Ferris

G. R.

Rowlands

K. M.

(Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 5): 323-356. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

93.

Sheldon

O. J.

Dunning

Ames

D. R.

2014. Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 125-137.

94.

Sitzmann

Johnson

S. K.

2012. The best laid plans: Examining the conditions under which a planning intervention improves learning and reduces attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 967-981.

95.

Smither

J. W.

London

Reilly

R. R.

2005. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58: 33-66.

96.

Spreitzer

G. M.

Cohen

S. G.

Ledford

G. E.

1999. Developing effective self-managing work teams in service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 24: 340-366.

97.

Stevens

M. J.

Campion

M. A.

1994. The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20: 503-530.

98.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Mathieu

J. E.

Salas

Cohen

2012. Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5: 2-24.

99.

Taylor

S. E.

Brown

J. D.

1988. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 193-210.

100.

Tesluk

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Marks

1997. Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In Brannick

M. T.

Salas

Prince

(Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 197-224. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

101.

von Hippel

Trivers

. 2011. The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34: 1-56.

102.

Wageman

1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-180.

103.

Yammarino

F. J.

Atwater

L. E.

1997. Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating agreement for human resources management. Organizational Dynamics, 25: 35-44.

104.

Zell

Krizan

2014. Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9: 111-125.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB