In this article, the three authors, each of whom has been collaborating in various ways with practitioners for over 40 years, engage in a metalogue to explore their experiences of engaging in collaborative research. A metalogue is a reflective conversation whereby the mode of conversation mirrors the topic being discussed. In this illustration of a metalogue, the authors explore how they have developed as collaborative scholars. Both in the respective stories and in the metalogue the themes of being in a space of not-knowing, relevance and relationships emerged. The article offers an account of how the authors grew into their respective collaborative scholarship approaches, the key themes that emerged and of the metalogue process as a method for shared reflection on the practice of scholarship.
AdlerN.ShaniA. B. (Rami)StyhreA. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations: Foundation for learning, change and theoretical development. Sage.
2.
AllenS.MarshallJ. (2015). Metalogue: Trying to talk about (un)sustainability—a reflection on experience. Tamara—Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 13(1-2), 1‐13. https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/380091.
3.
AtienzaC. M. (2017). Building organizational identity: An insider action research from a founders’ viewpoint. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(6), 569‐592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9410-2
4.
BartunekJ. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355‐372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393029
5.
BartunekJ. M.CrostaT. E.DameR. F.LeLacheurD. F. (1993). Managers and project leaders conducting their own action research interventions. In GolembiewskiR. T. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational consultation (pp. 27‐36). Marcel Dekker.
6.
BartunekJ. M.Foster-FishmanP. G.KeysC. B. (1996). Using collaborative advocacy to foster intergroup cooperation: A joint insider-outsider investigation. Human Relations, 49(6), 701‐733. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900601
7.
BartunekJ. M.KrimR.NecocheaR.HumphriesM. (1999). Sensemaking, sensegiving, and leadership in strategic organizational development. Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research, 2(1), 37‐71.
8.
BartunekJ. M.LaceyC.WoodD. (1992). Social cognition in organizational change: An insider/outsider approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(2), 204‐223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886392282004
9.
BartunekJ. M.LouisM. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Sage.
10.
BartunekJ. M.ReidR. D. (1992). The role of conflict in a second order change attempt. In Kolb & Bartunek, (pp. 116‐142).
11.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine.
12.
BjorkmanH.SundgrenM. (2005). Political entrepreneurship in action research: Learning from two cases. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(5), 399‐415. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510614913
13.
CanterinoF.ShaniA. B. (Rami)CoghlanD.BrunelliM. (2016). Collaborative management research as a modality of action research: Learning from a merger-based study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(2), 157‐186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316641509
14.
CoghlanD. (2018). Edgar Schein at 90: A celebratory and exploratory metalogue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(4), 385‐398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886318801279
15.
CoghlanD. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization (5th ed.). Sage.
16.
CoghlanD. (2023). Developing the practice of scholarship: The case of insider action research. Malaysian Journal of Action Research, 1(1), 4‐10. https://doi.org/10.61388/mjar.v1i1.2
17.
CoghlanD. (2024). Edgar H. Schein: The artistry of a reflexive organizational scholar practitioner. Routledge.
18.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2001). Doing action research in your own organization. Sage.
19.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization (2nd ed.). Sage.
20.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2008). Doing action research in your own organization (3rd ed.). Sage.
21.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). Sage.
22.
CoghlanD.ShaniA. B. (Rami). (2008). Collaborative management research through communities of inquiry: Challenges and skills. In ShaniA. B. (Rami)MohrmanS. A.PasmoreW. A.StymneB.AdlerN. (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research (pp. 601‐614). Sage.
23.
CoghlanD.ShaniA. B. (Rami) (2023). Creating and building shared scholarship in organization development and change: A metalogue. In NoumairD. A.ShaniA. B. (Rami)ZandeeD. (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 30, pp. 73‐94). Emerald.
24.
CutcherL.HardyC.RiachK.ThomasR. (2020). Reflections on reflexive theorizing: The need for a little more conversation. Organization Theory, 1(3), 1‐28. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720944183
25.
EveredM.LouisM. R. (1981). Alternatives perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside”. The Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 385‐395. https://www.jstor.org/stable/257374
26.
FisherD.TorbertW. R. (1995). Personal and organizational transformations. McGraw-Hill.
27.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
28.
GoodeL. L.BartunekJ. M. (1990). Action research in underbounded settings: The example of an apartment complex. Consultation, 9, 209‐228.
29.
GreenwoodD.LevinM. (1997). Introduction to action research. Sage.
30.
HansenA. V.MadsenS. (2019). Theorizing in organization studies: Lessons from key thinkers. Edward Elgar.
31.
HartH.KylenS. F.NorrgrenF.StymneB. (2004). Collaborative research through an executive Ph.D. Program. In AdlerN.ShaniA. B. (Rami)StyhreA. (Eds.), Collaborative research in organization: Foundation for learning, change and theoretical development (pp. 101‐116). Sage.
32.
HibbertP.CallagherL.SiedlokF.WindahlC.KimH. S. (2019). (Engaging or avoiding) change through reflexive practices. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 187‐203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617718089
33.
HibbertP.CouplandC.MacIntoshR. (2010). Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 5(1), 47‐62. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011042026
34.
KaplanR. S. (1998). Innovation action research: Creating new management theory and practice. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 89‐118.
35.
KenefickD.KirraneM. (2022). A little less conversation, a little more action: Participatory insider action research in an executive team. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(4), 453‐469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09580-x
36.
KolbD. M.BartunekJ. M. (Eds.). (1992). Hidden conflict in organizations: Uncovering behind-the-scenes disputes. Sage.
37.
KrimR. (1988). Managing to learn: Action inquiry in city hall. In ReasonP. (Ed.), Human inquiry in action (pp. 144‐162). Sage.
38.
LouisM. R.BartunekJ. M. (1992). Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(2), 101‐110. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649269212002
39.
MacIntoshR.MasonK.BeechN.BartunekJ. M. (2021). Delivering impact in management research: When does it really happen?Routledge.
40.
McKenzieJ.BartunekJ. M. (2023). Mirror, mirror outside my wall: Reflexive impacts of insider/outsider collaborative inquiry on the insider researcher. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(4), 714‐739. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231177486
41.
MeyerJ.LandR. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge.
42.
MochM. K.BartunekJ. M. (1990). Creating alternative realities at work. Harper & Row.
43.
NymanV.BergM.DowneS.BondasT. (2016). Insider action research and a method—exploring institutional encounters from within a birthing context. Action Research, 14(2), 217‐233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315600225
44.
RamirezI.BartunekJ. M. (1989). The multiple realities and experience of internal organization development consultation in health care. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2(4), 40‐57. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534818910134086
45.
RothJ.ShaniA. B. (Rami)LearyM. (2007). Facing the challenges of new capability development within a biopharma company. Action Research, 5(1), 41‐60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307072875
46.
ShaniA. B. (Rami)CoghlanD.PaineJ.CanterinoF. (2023). Collaborative inquiry for change and changing: Advances in science-practice transformations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(4), 541‐555. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231204372
47.
ShaniA. B. (Rami)MohrmanS. A.PasmoreW. A.StymneB.AdlerN. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage.
48.
ShaniA. B. (Rami)PasmoreW. A. (1985). Organization inquiry: Towards a new model of the action research process. In WarrickD. D. (Ed.), Contemporary organization development: Current thinking and applications (pp. 438‐448). Scott, Foresman and Company.
49.
StevensonW. B.BartunekJ. M. (1996). Power, interaction, position, and the generation of cultural agreement in organizations. Human Relations, 49(1), 75‐104. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900104
50.
TorbertW. R. (1987). Managing the corporate dream. Dow-Jones Irwin.
