Love (in the agape form) forms the foundation of most leadership concepts and has been ignored in research. We respond to the debate on universal applicability of leadership forms by bringing followers into the spotlight through our examination of the interactive influence of loving (agape-based) and non-loving (non-agape-based) leadership styles and followers’ attachment dimensions (self-model and other-model) on follower outcomes. Two hundred and eighty-two business management students worked in teams on a task under the direction of leaders who demonstrated agape-based behaviours and leaders who demonstrated non-agape-based behaviours in a laboratory experiment. Agape-based leadership was positively related with follower satisfaction with the leader, team commitment and perception of leaders’ effectiveness. Further, followers’ attachment dimensions (self- and other-model) moderated the relationship between agape-based leadership and follower work attitudes, such that the relationship was positive for followers with a negative self-model and for followers with a positive other-model, and the relationship was negative for followers with a negative other-model. We provide a practical set of tools for demonstrating agape leadership behaviours which are useful for educators and organizations. We suggest that leaders must alter their leadership style depending on their followers’ attachment dimensions.
AinsworthM. D. S., BellS. M., & StaytonD. S. (1971). Individual differences in strange-situation behaviour of one-year-olds. In The origins of human social relations (pp. 151–179). Academic Press.
2.
AinsworthM. D. S., BleharM. C., WatersE., & WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaurn.
3.
AllenN. J., & MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
BarlingJ., ChristieA., & TurnerN. (2008). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 851–861. 10.1007/s10551-007-9552-8
6.
BartholomewK., & HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
7.
BassB. M., & SteidlmeierP. (1999). Ethics, character and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217. 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8
8.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. British Journal of Psychiatry, 201–210. 10.1192/bjp.130.3.201
10.
BrennanK. A., ClarkC. L., & ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford.
11.
CaldwellC., & DixonR. D. (2010). Love, forgiveness, and trust: Critical values of the modern leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 91–101. 10.1007/s10551-009-0184-z
12.
CarvalhoF. K., & MullaZ. R. (2021). All you need is love: The relationship between agape and work outcomes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 10.1108/IJOA-04-2021-2713
13.
ChoiY., & Mai-DaltonR. R. (1999). The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 397–421. 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00025-9
14.
ChristieA., BarlingJ., & TurnerN. (2011). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Model specification and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2943–2984.
15.
CongerJ. A., KanungoR. N., & MenonS. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–767. 10.1002/1099-1379(200011)21
De CremerD., & Van KnippenbergD. (2004). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 140–155. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.04.002
18.
De VriesR. E., RoeR. A., & TaillieuT. C. B. (2002). Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 121–137. 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00097-8
19.
EhrhartM. G., & KleinK. J. (2001). Predicting followers’ preferences for charismatic leadership: the influence of follower values and personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 153–179.
20.
EvaN., SendjayaS., & PrajogoD. (2013). Servant leadership and job satisfaction: The moderating roles of the leader’s decision making process and organisational structure. Monash University.
21.
FelfeJ., & SchynsB. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708–739. 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x
22.
FuP. P., TsuiA. S., LiuJ., & LiL. (2010). Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 222–254.
23.
GrantA. M., & HofmannD. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
24.
GriffinD., & BartholomewK. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions of underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 430–445.
25.
HaggaiJ. E. (2009). The influential leader: 12 steps to igniting visionary decision making. Harvest House Publishers.
26.
HansbroughT. K. (2012). The construction of a transformational leader: Follower attachment and leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1–17. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00913.x
27.
HassanS., MahsudR., YuklG., & PrussiaG. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133–146. 10.1108/02683941311300252
28.
HazanC., & ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
29.
HazanC., & ShaverP. (1990). Love and work: An attachment–theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 270–280.
30.
HendrickC., & HendrickS. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.
31.
HinojosaA. S., Davis McCauleyK., Randolph-SengB., & GardnerW. L. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 595–610. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.002
32.
HochJ. E., BommerW. H., & DulebohnJ. H. (2016). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 1–29. 10.1177/0149206316665461
33.
HowellJ. M. (1986). Charismatic leadership: Effects of leadership style and group productivity on individual adjustment and performance. University of British Columbia.
34.
HowellJ. M., & FrostP. J. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 243–269. 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90052-6
35.
HowellJ. M., & ShamirB. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96–112. 10.1108/S1479-357120180000009019
36.
JeungC. W., & YoonH. J. (2016). Leader humility and psychological empowerment: Investigating contingencies. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(7), 1122–1136. 10.1108/JMP-07-2015-0270
37.
JungD. I., & AvolioB. J. (1999). Effects of leadership style and followers’ cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 208–218. 10.2307/257093
38.
JungD. I., & AvolioB. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949–965.
39.
KingM. L. J. (2010). Stride toward freedom: The Montgomery story. Beacon Press.
40.
KleinK. J., & HouseR. J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 183–198. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90034-9
41.
KockN., MayfieldM., MayfieldJ., SextonS., & De La GarzaL. M. (2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional support and understanding influences follower performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217–236. 10.1177/1548051818806290
42.
LemoineG. J., HartnellC. A., & LeroyH.2019, ‘Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership’. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187. 10.5465/annals.2016.0121
LordR. G., BrownD. J., & FreibergS. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/fFollower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(3), 167–203. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2832
45.
ManbyJ. (2012). Love works: Seven timeless principles for effective leaders. Zondervan.
46.
MeindlJ. R. (1995). The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 329–341. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90012-8
47.
MeléD. (2012). The Christian notion of Αγάπη (agápē): Towards a more complete view of business ethics. In Leadership through the classics (pp. 79–91). Springer.
48.
MoyesG. D., & ReddT. C. (2008). Empirical analysis of factors influencing the level of job satisfaction of Caucasian and Hispanic accounting professionals. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(10), 21–42.
49.
NemiroffP. M., & PasmoreW. A. (1975). Lost at sea. In The 1975 annual handbook for group facilitators. University Associates.
50.
NüboldA., MuckP. M., & MaierG. W. (2013). A new substitute for leadership? Followers’ state core self-evaluations. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 29–44. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.07.002
51.
OordT. J. (2005). The love racket: Defining love and agape for the love-and-science research program. Zygon, 40(4), 919–938. 10.1093/litthe/3.2.138
52.
OwensB. P., JohnsonM. D., & MitchellT. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organizational Science, 24(5), 1517–1538.
53.
PattersonK. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, August. https://www.regent.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/patterson_servant_leadership.pdf
54.
PerdueB. C., & SummersJ. O. (1986). Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317. 10.2307/3151807
55.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press. 10.5860/choice.42-0624
56.
PodsakoffP. M., & PodsakoffN. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002
57.
PopperM., & MayselessO. (2003). Back to basics: Applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(1), 41–65. 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00183-2
58.
PopperM., MayselessO., & CastelnovoO. (2000). Transformational leadership and attachment. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 267–289. 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00038-2
59.
SchynsB., & SandersK. (2007). In the eyes of the beholder: Personality and the perception of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2345–2363. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00261.x
60.
ShalitA., PopperM., & ZakayD. (2010). Followers’ attachment styles and their preference for social or for personal charismatic leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(5), 458–472. 10.1108/01437731011056461
61.
ThoroughgoodC. N., & SawyerK. B. (2018). Who wants to follow the leader? Using personality and work value profiles to predict preferences for charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic styles of leading. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 181–202. 10.1007/s10869-016-9486-1
62.
Van DierendonckD., & PattersonK. (2014). Compassionate love as a cornerstone of servant leadership: An integration of previous theorizing and research. Journal of Business Ethics. 10.1007/s10551-014-2085-z
63.
Van KnippenbergB., & Van KnippenbergD. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25–37. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25
64.
WoffordJ. C., WhittingtonJ. L., & GoodwinV. L. (2016). Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2), 196–211.
65.
WongC., & LawK. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274.
66.
YuklG. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289.
67.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
