What if play is more than just an attitude or set of behaviors? What if the world is fundamentally and inherently playful? What if, when we find ourselves playing, we are not the authors or agents who initiate the activity, but instead we are giving ourselves over to the play of the world, being-played as it were? In this essay, we consider these questions in reference to the tradition of philosophical hermeneutics, discussing the work of Gadamer and others and tracing out the implications for gamification research.
AndersenN. Å. (2009). Power at play: The relationships between play, work and governance. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
ArjorantaJ. (2014). Game definitions: A Wittgensteinian approach. Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 14(1). Retrieved from http://gamestudies.org/1401/articles/arjoranta
3.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, England: Heinemann.
4.
CosteaB.CrumpN.HolmJ. (2005). Dionysus at work? The ethos of play and the ethos of management. Culture and Organization, 11, 139-151.
5.
DeterdingS.DixonD.KhaledR.NackeL. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland, 28 - 30 September 2011, pp. 9-15. New York, NY: ACM
6.
DeterdingS. (2019). Gamification in management: Between choice architecture and humanistic design. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 131-136.
7.
DostalR. J. (2002). Gadamer’s relation to Heidegger and phenomenology. In DostalR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 247-266). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
FigalG. (2002). The doing of the thing itself: Gadamer’s hermeneutic ontology of language. In DostalR. J. (Ed.), Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 102-125). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
FigalG. (2010). Objectivity: The hermeneutical and philosophy. New York: State University of New York.
10.
GadamerH.-G. (2004). Truth and method. London, England: Continuum.
11.
GeorgeT. (2012). Thing, object, life. Research in Phenomenology, 42, 18-34.
12.
HamariJ. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, 236-245.
13.
HuizingaJ. (1950). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
14.
HunterC.JemielniakD.PostułaA. (2010). Temporal and spatial shifts within playful work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23, 87-102.
15.
HuotariK.HamariJ. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27, 21-31.
16.
JacobsC. D.StatlerM. (2006). Toward a technology of foolishness: Developing scenarios through serious play. International Studies of Management & Organization, 36(3), 77-92.
17.
LandersR. (2019). Gamification misunderstood: How badly executed and rhetorical gamification obscures its potential. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 137-140.
18.
MainemelisC.AltmanY. (2010). Work and play: New twists on an old relationship. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 4-9.
19.
MainemelisC.RonsonS. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81-131.
20.
MorschheuserB.HamariJ. (2019). The Gamification of Work: Lessons From Crowdsourcing. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 145-148.
21.
MorschheuserB.HamariJ.KoivistoJ.MaedcheA. (2017). Gamified crowdsourcing: Conceptualization, literature review, and future agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 106, 26-43.
22.
RoosJ.VictorB.StatlerM. (2004). Playing seriously with strategy. Long Range Planning, 37, 549-568.
23.
ShotterJ. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for “withness”-thinking. Organization Studies, 27, 585-604.
24.
SørensenB. M.SpoelstraS. (2012). Play at work: Continuation, intervention and usurpation. Organization, 19, 81-97.
25.
StatlerM.RoosJ.VictorB. (2009). Ain’t misbehavin’: Taking play seriously in organizations. Journal of Change Management, 9, 87-107.
26.
StyhreA. (2008). The element of play in innovation work: The case of new drug development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 136-146.
27.
TrittinH.FieselerC.MaltsevaK. (2019). The Serious and the Mundane: Reflections on Gamified CSR Communication. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28, 141-144.
28.
WerbachK.HunterD. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
29.
TrittinH.FieselerC.MaltsevaK. (2018). The Serious and the Mundane: Reflections on Gamified CSR Communication. Journal of Management Inquiry. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1056492618790920
30.
WerbachK.HunterD. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
