Issue is taken with the relative absence of the analysis of power from many leading institutional theory accounts of organizations. The category of institutional entrepreneurs is seen as a functionalist theory-saving device. The stress on norms, myths, and legitimacy is questioned. The importance of a consideration of explicitly political organization is illustrated with an account of the deinstitutionalization of the Bjelke-Peterson government in Queensland. As well as institutionalization the importance of deinstitutionalization is suggested as is the centrality of translation. Recent work that has brought power and agency back into focus is discussed. The centrality of power as the main concept of the social sciences is promoted. The central importance of the state for early institutional accounts, its relative absence from more current ones, and its role in the creation of an “audit society” that would seem most likely to expand significantly in the wake of the global financial crisis is noted.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. ( 1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947-952.
2.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. ( 1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bauman, Z. ( 1987). Legislators and interpreters. Cambridge : Polity.
4.
Blum, A.F., & McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives. American Sociological Review, 36, 98-109.
5.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1990). A theory of practice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
7.
Clegg, S.R. ( 1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
8.
Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. ( 2006). Power and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Clegg, S.R., & Haugaard, M. ( 2009). The sage handbook of power. London : Sage.
10.
Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter .
11.
Dahl, R.A. ( 1961). Who governs?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Davenport, S., & Leitch, S. ( 2005). Circuits of power in practice: Strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority. Organization Studies, 26, 1603-1623.
13.
Derrida, J. ( 1976). Of Grammatology. (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. ( 1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
15.
Foucault, M. ( 1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen & Lane.
16.
Garfinkel, H. ( 1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Goffman, E. ( 1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
18.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
19.
Gramsci, A. (1971). From the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
20.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C.R. ( 1996). Understanding radical organizational change; bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review26, 1022-1054.
21.
Greenwood, R., & Meyer, R.E. ( 2008). Influencing ideas: A celebration of DiMaggio and Powell (1983). Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 258-264.
22.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C. , Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds.). (2008). The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
Hall, J.A. ( 2008). Liberalism for Hobbesian reasons. Journal of Power, 1, 75-85.
24.
Higgins, W., & Hallström, K.T. (2007). Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization, 14, 685-704.
25.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Lakoff, G. ( 1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E.T. ( 2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993-1012.
28.
Levy, D., & Scully, M. ( 2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern Prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28, 971-991.
29.
Leca, B., & Naccache, P. ( 2006). A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship . Organization, 13, 627-651.
30.
Lukes, S. ( 1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
31.
Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. ( 1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
32.
Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. ( 1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71-97). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Mills, C.W. ( 1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
34.
Power, M. ( 1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Sacks, H. ( 1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31-74), New York: Free Press.
36.
Sacks, H. ( 1992). Lectures on conversations. Oxford : Blackwell.
37.
Scott, W.R. ( 1983). Healthcare organization in the 1980s: The convergence of public and professional control systems. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 99-114). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Scott, W.R. ( 1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
39.
Scott, W.R. ( 2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents . Organization Studies, 29, 219-238.
40.
Selznick, P. ( 1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41.
Shenon, P. ( 2008). The commission: The uncensored history of the 9/11 investigation . New York: Hachette Book Group .
42.
Silverman, D. ( 1998). Harvey sacks: Social science and conversation analysis . New York: Oxford University Press .
43.
Tolbert, P.S., & Zucker, L.G. ( 1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
44.
Walsh, J.P. ( 2008). CEO compensation and the responsibilities of the business scholar to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 26-33.
45.
Wear, R. ( 2002). Johannes Bjelke-Petersen: The Lord’s Premier. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
46.
Weber, M. ( 1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology . Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
Zucker, L.G. ( 1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence . American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
48.
Zucker, L.G. ( 1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Advances in Organizational theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 1-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
