This article uses institutional theory to examine barriers faced by forced migrant entrepreneurs in labour, capital and product markets, the strategies they employ to overcome these challenges and the role of different actors in supporting their efforts. Empirically, the study draws on interviews with Venezuelans who were forced to migrate due to the political and economic crisis in their country and established a business in Colombia. Findings identify the different institutional voids and misalignments that pose nested challenges for forced migrant entrepreneurs, and how the government, digital technologies and migrant communities become institutional intermediaries to enable their workaround practices. These findings provide different theoretical and practical contributions to migrant entrepreneurship.
ArmaniosDEEesleyCELiJ, et al. (2017) How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal38: 1373–1390.
4.
ArregleJBatjargalBHittMA, et al. (2015) Family ties in entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39: 313–344.
5.
AuWCDrenchevaAYewJL (2022) How do refugee entrepreneurs navigate institutional voids? Insights from Malaysia*. In: Grant PickernellDBattistiMDannZ, et al. (eds) Disadvantaged Entrepreneurship and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 121–144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620220000014006 (accessed 22 July 2024).
6.
BambergerPAPrattMG (2010) Moving forward by looking back: Reclaiming unconventional research contexts and samples in organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Journal53: 665–671.
7.
BarthJRHilliardJJaheraJS, et al. (2020) Payday lending, crime, and bankruptcy: Is there a connection?Journal of Consumer Affairs54: 1159–1177.
8.
BizriRM (2017) Refugee-entrepreneurship: a social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development29: 847–868.
9.
BlavoukosSBourantonisD (2017) Nested institutions. In: KoopsJABiermannR (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 303–317. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-36039-7_14 (accessed 21 January 2025).
10.
Bold (2025) Datáfonos, pagos en línea y Cuenta Digital. Available at: https://bold.co (accessed 26 January 2025).
BosmaNHillSIonescu-SomersA, et al. (2021) GEM 2020/2021 Global Report. Global entrepreneurship monitor. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report.
13.
BothelloJNasonRSSchnyderG (2019) Institutional voids and organization studies: Towards an epistemological rupture. Organization Studies40: 1499–1512.
14.
BrenesERCiravegnaLPichardoCA (2019) Managing institutional voids: A configurational approach to understanding high performance antecedents. Journal of Business Research105: 345–358.
15.
Bucken-KnappGFakihZSpeharA (2019) Talking about integration: The voices of syrian refugees taking part in introduction programmes for integration into Swedish society. International Migration57: 221–234.
16.
CamachoSBarriosA (2022) Social commerce affordances for female entrepreneurship: the case of Facebook. Electronic Markets32: 1145–1167.
Caraballo-AriasYMadridJBarriosMC (2018) Working in Venezuela: How the crisis has affected the labor conditions. Annals of Global Health84: 512–522.
22.
ClarkKRamachandranI (2020) Institutional misalignment and cost of doing business abroad: a varieties of capitalism approach. European Journal of International Management14753–774.
23.
ClaytonPFeldmanMLoweN (2018) Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives32: 104–124.
24.
DanneelsE (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal23: 1095–1121.
25.
DauLALiJLylesMA, et al. (2022) Informal institutions and the international strategy of MNEs: Effects of institutional effectiveness, convergence, and distance. Journal of International Business Studies53: 1257–1281.
26.
De SotoH (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
27.
den HondFde BakkerFGADohJ (2015) What prompts companies to collaboration with NGOs? Recent evidence from the Netherlands. Business & Society54: 187–228.
28.
DouhanRHenreksonM (2010) Entrepreneurship and second-best institutions: going beyond Baumol’s typology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics20: 629–643.
29.
DuttNHawnOVidalE, et al. (2016) How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Academy of Management Journal59: 818–840.
EmbiricosA (2020) From refugee to entrepreneur? Challenges to refugee self-reliance in Berlin, Germany. Journal of Refugee Studies33: 245–267.
32.
Escorcia CaballeroJPSchmutzlerJLópez LambrañoM, et al. (2024) Dinámica de la actividad empresarial en Colombia 2023-2024: Enfrentando Desafíos. / GEM Colombia 2024. 7April. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Available at: https://gemconsortium.org/report/reporte-gem-colombia-2023-2024 (accessed 10 January 2025).
33.
FarmakiAChristouP (2019) Refugee migration and service industries: advancing the research agenda. The Service Industries Journal39: 668–683.
GandelmanNLaméD (2024) Trust towards migrants. Theory and Decision96: 311–331.
37.
GauRRamirezEBaruaME, et al. (2014) Community-based initiatives and poverty alleviation in subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Macromarketing34: 160–170.
38.
GeJCarneyMKellermannsF (2019) Who fills institutional voids? Entrepreneurs’ utilization of political and family ties in emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice43: 1124–1147.
39.
GiudiciGGueriniMRossi-LamastraC (2018) Reward-based crowdfunding of entrepreneurial projects: the effect of local altruism and localized social capital on proponents’ success. Small Business Economics50: 307–324.
GIZ (2023) Creating employment prospects for refugees, IDPs and host communities in Ethiopia. Available at: https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/129878.html (accessed 17 January 2024).
42.
GondJ-PPalazzoGBasuK (2009) Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly19: 57–85.
43.
GroutsisDVassilopoulouJOzbilginM, et al. (2023) From the editors—Migration management: introduction and overview. Academy of Management Discoveries9: 117–124.
44.
HeilbrunnS (2019) Against all odds: refugees bricoleuring in the void. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research25: 1045–1064.
45.
HeilbrunnSIannoneRL (2020) From center to periphery and back again: A systematic literature review of refugee entrepreneurship. Sustainability12: 7658.
46.
HenreksonMSanandajiT (2011) The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics7: 47–75.
47.
HillSIonescu-SomersACodurasA, et al. (2022) GEM 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report(accessed 24 January 2025).
Inter-Agency Coordination Platform For Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela (R4V) (2024) Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela. Available at: https://www.r4v.info/en/refugeeandmigrants (accessed 22 July 2024).
Jafari-SadeghiVNkongolo-BakendaJ-MDanaL-P, et al. (2020) Home country institutional context and entrepreneurial internationalization: The significance of human capital attributes. Journal of International Entrepreneurship18: 165–195.
54.
JainSMansuriG (2003) A little at a time: the use of regularly scheduled repayments in microfinance programs. Journal of Development Economics72: 253–279.
KlagMLangleyA (2013) Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews15: 149–166.
57.
KostovaT (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review24: 308–324.
58.
LeatherbeeMEesleyCE (2014) Boulevard of broken behaviors: Socio-psychological mechanisms of entrepreneurship policies. 2488712, SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2488712 (accessed 22 July 2024).
59.
LiuN (2021) Institutional intermediaries and firm choices in response to regulations. Academy of Management Journal64: 981–1007.
60.
MairJMartiI (2009) Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing24: 419–435.
61.
MairJMartíIVentrescaMJ (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal55: 819–850.
62.
Martínez RomeroACMoreno BarragánJAPereira LaverdeF, et al. (2023) Actividad empresarial en Colombia 2022 - 2023: En camino hacia la reactivación. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Available at: https://gemcolombia.org/ (accessed 24 January 2025).
63.
MawsonSKasemL (2019) Exploring the entrepreneurial intentions of Syrian refugees in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research25: 1128–1146.
McCarthyB (2012) From fishing and factories to cultural tourism: The role of social entrepreneurs in the construction of a new institutional field. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development24: 259–282.
66.
McKeeverEAndersonAJackS (2014) Entrepreneurship and mutuality: social capital in processes and practices. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development26: 453–477.
67.
McKeeverEJackSAndersonA (2015) Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing30: 50–65.
68.
MickiewiczTOlarewajuT (2020) New venture evolution of migrants under institutional voids: Lessons from Shonga Farms in Nigeria. International Small Business Journal38: 404–423.
MurithiWVershininaNRodgersP (2019) Where less is more: institutional voids and business families in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research26. Emerald Publishing Limited: 158–174.
73.
NasonRSBothelloJ (2023) Far from Void: How Institutions Shape Growth in the Informal Economy. 4472565, SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4472565 (accessed 21 December 2023).
74.
NiemiLStenholmPHakalaH, et al. (2022) Immanent sensemaking by entrepreneurs and the interpretation of consumer context. International Small Business Journal40: 966–990.
75.
NorthD (1990) Institutions and their consequences for economic performance. In: Cook KS and Levy M (eds) The Limits of Rationality. The University of Chicago Press, pp.383–401.
OmataN (2018) Who takes advantage of mobility? Exploring the nexus between refugees’ movement, livelihoods and socioeconomic status in West Africa. African Geographical Review37: 98–108.
78.
ParmigianiARivera-SantosM (2015) Sourcing for the base of the pyramid: Constructing supply chains to address voids in subsistence markets. Journal of Operations Management 33–34: 60–70.
79.
ParthibanRQureshiIBandyopadhyayS, et al. (2020) Leveraging ICT to overcome complementary institutional voids: insights from institutional work by a social enterprise to help marginalized. Information Systems Frontiers22: 633–653.
80.
PhillimoreJ (2011) Refugees, acculturation strategies, stress and integration. Journal of Social Policy40: 575–593.
81.
PindadoEAlarcónSSánchezM, et al. (2023) International entrepreneurship in Africa: The roles of institutional voids, entrepreneurial networks and gender. Journal of Business Research166: 114109.
82.
PorterMHaslamN (2005) Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced personsa meta-analysis. JAMA294: 602–612.
Rappi PR Team (2023) Rappi orgulloso de ser colombiano y ser el aliado estratégico para el crecimiento del comercio en el país. Available at: https://global.rappi.com/ (accessed 30 July 2024).
RefaiDHaloubRLeverJ (2018) Contextualizing entrepreneurial identity among Syrian refugees in Jordan: The emergence of a destabilized habitus?The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation19: 250–260.
ShneikatBAlrawadiehZ (2019) Unraveling refugee entrepreneurship and its role in integration: empirical evidence from the hospitality industry. The Service Industries Journal39: 741–761.
SinkovicsRRAlfoldiEA (2012) Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative Research. Management International Review52: 817–845.
95.
SolimanSKelesJYFottouhN (2023) Refugee entrepreneurship and institutional voids: The case of syrian refugee entrepreneurs in Egypt. Academy of Management Discoveries9: 363–382.
96.
SolukJKammerlanderNDarwinS (2021) Digital entrepreneurship in developing countries: The role of institutional voids. Technological Forecasting and Social Change170: 120876.
97.
StephanUUhlanerLMStrideC (2015) Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies46: 308–331.
98.
SydowACannatelliBLGiudiciA, et al. (2022) Entrepreneurial workaround practices in severe institutional voids: Evidence From Kenya. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice46: 331-367.
99.
SzkudlarekBNardonLOslandJS, et al. (2021) When context matters: What happens to international theory when researchers study refugees. Academy of Management Perspectives35: 461–484.
100.
ToivonenA (2023) Refugee economic self-reliance practices: How institutional intermediations negotiate opportunities for refugee employment and entrepreneurship. Geoforum140: 103700.
Van RaemdonckL (2019) Comparison of Four Different Livelihood Programmes for Urban Refugee Women in Durban, South Africa: Insights from the Capability Approach. Journal of International Migration and Integration20: 497–519.
WautersBLambrechtJ (2008) Barriers to refugee entrepreneurship in Belgium: Towards an explanatory model. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34: 895–915.
113.
WebbJWKhouryTAHittMA (2020) The Influence of formal and informal institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice44: 504–526.
114.
WeiTWanQ (2024) Filling institutional voids: interactions between digital and individual intermediaries in facilitating corporate social entrepreneurs for building inclusive markets. Chinese Management Studies19: 416–439.
WilliamsNKrasniqiBA (2018) Coming out of conflict: How migrant entrepreneurs utilise human and social capital. Journal of International Entrepreneurship16: 301–323.
117.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
