As Medicaid continues to expand, it remains unclear if reimbursement rates for cleft care are keeping up with the national economy. The purpose of this study is to determine how financial trends in cleft lip and palate repair reimbursements compare to annual changes in the U.S. economy.
Design
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for cleft lip and palate repair were retrospectively reviewed between 2018 and 2023. Reimbursements were adjusted for inflation to 2023 U.S. dollars using Medicaid physician fee schedules. Annual percentage changes in inflation-adjusted reimbursements, and reimbursement Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) were compared to the annual change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Setting
Multi-state, Medicaid.
Participants
Medicaid reimbursements of 6 U.S. states, 5 with highest birthrates: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania. Colorado, the study institution, was evaluated.
Main Outcome(s)
Primary outcomes included annual changes in overall and inflation-adjusted reimbursement rates for cleft lip and palate surgical procedures as compared to annual changes in CPI.
Results
The U.S. CPI increased by 20.9% from 2018 to 2023, while the overall total percentage change in reimbursement rates for all cleft lip and palate procedures increased by 7.23%. The inflation-adjusted overall percent change in reimbursements for all procedures decreased by −12.81%. For all procedures, the average CAGR was −2.66%.
Conclusions
Inflation-adjusted reimbursement rates for cleft lip and palate repair have significantly decreased in contrast to the annual growth in U.S. CPI. These findings show a potential lack of financial sustainability for surgical cleft care, indicating the need for healthcare policy reform.
ParkerSEMaiCTCanfieldMA RickardRWangYMeyerREAndersonPMasonCACollinsJSKirbyRS, et al.Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(12):1008-1016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20735
3.
HuntOBurdenDHepperPJohnstonC. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(3):274-285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji004
4.
Hocevar-BoltezarIJarcAKozeljV. Ear, nose and voice problems in children with orofacial clefts. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(4):276-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215106000454
5.
de VriesIABreugemCCvan der HeulAMEijkemansMJKonMMink van der MolenAB. Prevalence of feeding disorders in children with cleft palate only: A retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1507-1515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1117-x
6.
YangCHLaiJPLeeACChengLHHwangCF. Prognostic factors for hearing outcomes in children with cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):368e-374e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005219
NguyenKHWilsonIBWallackARTrivediAN. Medicaid expansion, managed care plan composition, and enrollee experience. Am J Manag Care. 2022;28(8):390-396. doi:https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2022.89198.
9.
ShaddyREDenneSC, Committee on D, Committee on Pediatric R. Clinical report–guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):850-860. doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0082
10.
ReesJMuskettTEnderbyPStackhouseJ. Implications of untreated cleft palate in the developing world: Adaptation of an outcome measure. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(1):1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000440836
11.
CostaBMcWilliamsDBligheSHudsonNHotton MSwan MCStockNM. Isolation, uncertainty and treatment delays: Parents’ experiences of having a baby with cleft lip/palate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(1):82-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211055006
12.
MeilleGPostB. The effects of the medicaid expansion on hospital utilization, employment, and capital. Med Care Res Rev. 2023;80(2):165-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221133165
13.
L E. Plastic Surgery Milestones.
14.
BlauJAMarksCEPhillipsBTHollenbeckST. Disparities between operative time and relative value units for plastic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(3):638-644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008276
15.
GongJHKhuranaAMehraPEltoraiAEM. Medicare reimbursement trends for hospital-based oral maxillofacial surgery procedures: 2003 to 2020. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(9):1821-1827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.009.
16.
RochlinDHChayaBFFloresRL. National undervaluation of cleft surgical services: Evidence from a comparative analysis of 50,450 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;151(3):603-610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009922
17.
GuptaNHaglinJMMarosticaCWThornburgDACasey 3rdWJ. Trends in medicare reimbursement for reconstructive plastic surgery procedures: 2000 to 2019. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(1):1541-1551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006914
18.
SiotosCCheahMADamoulakisGKellyJSiotouKSchecterLSShenaq DSDermanGHDorafsharAH. Trends of medicare reimbursement rates for common plastic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(5):1220-1225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007878
19.
KandiLAJarvisTLShroutMThornburgDAHowardMAEllisMTevenCM. Trends in medicare reimbursement for the top 20 surgical procedures in craniofacial trauma. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(1):247-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008840
20.
YaffeNMQuereshyHAQuintonBAOttesonTDShahJR. Reimbursement trends in pediatric otolaryngology from 2000 to 2020: A CMS physician fee schedule analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;168(1):59-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221091697
21.
McCuskerSBSchmalbachCE. The otolaryngologist's cost in treating facial trauma: American academy of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery survey. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3):366-371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811429007
22.
HsiaoWCBraunPYntemaDBeckerER. Estimating physicians’ work for a resource-based relative-value scale. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(13):835-841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198809293191305.
23.
OstermanMJKBHMartinJADriscollAKValenzuelaCP. National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 72, Number 1 January 31, 2023. Published online 2021:15-44. Accessed November 29, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm.
24.
Total Number of Births KFF. Accessed November 28 hwkoos-in-o-bcsBc.
25.
State of California Department of Industrial Relations. Accessed November 29 hwdcgdFPM-ca.
26.
TMHP Fee Schedules. Accessed November 29 hptcFOFa.
27.
Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration Medicaid Reimbursement Schedules. Accessed November 29 hamcmrh-m-r-s.
Pennsylvania FeeLookup. Accessed November 29 hwn-scwpMF.
30.
Provider Rates and Fee Schedule | Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing. Accessed November 29 hhcgp-r-f-s.
31.
CPI Home: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed November 28 hwbgc.
32.
Sommers BD GDWIMMTMtEJdj.
33.
PickensGKaracaZCutlerEDworskyMEibnerCMooreBGibsonTIyerSWongHS. Changes in hospital inpatient utilization following health care reform. Health Serv Res. 2018;53(4):2446-2469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12734
34.
HsiangWRLukasiewiczAGentryMKimCYLeslieMPPelkerRFormanHPWizniaDH. Medicaid patients have greater difficulty scheduling health care appointments compared with private insurance patients: A meta-analysis. Inquiry. 2019;56:46958019838118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019838118
35.
SkinnerACMayerML. Effects of insurance status on children's access to specialty care: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-194
36.
HaucSCLongASLittlefieldTR StephanAPJunnAHRiveraJCDinisJJunnAPersingJAAlperovichM. Role of state insurance policy in orthotic helmet access for deformational plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(1):125-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010231
37.
TruongNMZhuangTLeversedgeCMaCBKamalRNShapiroLM. Medicaid insurance is associated with treatment disparities for proximal humerus fractures in a national database analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32(7):e366-e378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.016
38.
BarreroCEKavanaghNMPontellMESalineroLKWagnerCSBartlettSPTaylorJASwansonJW. Associations between medicaid expansion and timely repair of cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(7):2116-2120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009524
39.
HsiangWRWizniaDYousmanLNajemMMosier-MillsAJinGJainSKhunteADavisKAFormanHP, et al.Urgent care centers delay emergent surgical care based on patient insurance Status in the United States. Ann Surg. 2020;272(4):548-553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004373
40.
ClarkCROmmerbornMJCoullBAPhamDQHaasJ. State medicaid eligibility and care delayed because of cost. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1263-1265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1214874
41.
ParishSLRoseRAYooJSwaineJG. State medicaid policies and the health care access of low-income children with special health care needs living in the American south. N C Med J. 2012;73(1):15-23.
42.
PotakHIobstCA. Influence of insurance type on the access to pediatric care for children with distal radius torus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(5):237-240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000929
43.
DeleyiannisFWTeBockhorstSCastroDA. The financial impact of multidisciplinary cleft care: An analysis of hospital revenue to advance program development. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):615-622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6ffb
44.
AbbottMMMearaJG. Patient protection and affordable care act: Implications for pediatric plastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):217-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241b8a4
45.
WangKYHirschJANicolaGNGoldingLPLeeRKChenMM. Implications of the revisions and revaluation of office/outpatient evaluation and management codes for neuroradiology reimbursement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(7):1160-1164. doi:https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6619
46.
BisgaierJRhodesKV. Auditing access to specialty care for children with public insurance. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(24):2324-2333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1013285
JiangDDChakiryanNHGillisKAAcvedoAMChenYAustinJCSeidemanCA. Relative value units do not adequately account for operative time in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(5):883-887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.043
49.
DeleyiannisFWPorterAC. Economic factors affecting head and neck reconstructive microsurgery: The surgeons’ and hospital's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(1):157-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000263535.82260.f1
50.
KriegerLMLeeGK. The economics of plastic surgery practices: Trends in income, procedure mix, and volume. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(1):192-199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000128820.10811.0a
51.
PatelACluneJEForteAChangCC. The impact of the Medicare sustainable growth rate formula on reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):270e-271e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef952b
