Effectiveness of a Novel 3D-Printed Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance (D-NAM) on Improving the Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of the current study was to introduce and measure the effectiveness of a new 3D-printed nasoalveolar molding (D-NAM) appliance on improving the maxillary arch dimensions (MADs) in infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) before surgical lip repair.

Design:

A prospective, balanced, randomized, parallel groups, single-blinded, controlled trial.

Setting:

All the steps of the current study were carried in the Department of Orthodontics, Cairo University in Egypt.

Participants:

Thirty-four, nonsyndromic infants with UCLP.

Interventions:

The eligible infants were randomly assigned into either no-treatment (control) or to the new D-NAM groups. In D-NAM group, the maxillary models were 3D scanned into virtual models onto which segmentation and alveolar segments approximation were performed. Approximation movements were divided into 3 models representing 3 activation steps. On each of these models, virtual appliance construction was performed followed by 3D printing of the appliance. Nasal stent was added manually to the appliances of the second and third steps. Horizontal tapes were applied to infants in the D-NAM group only.

Main Outcomes Measures:

A Blinded assessors carried all the MADs measurements virtually on digital models collected at the beginning (T1) and after (T2) treatment.

Results:

Clinically and/or statistically significant improvements in all the measured MADs were recorded in D-NAM group at T2 before surgical lip repair in comparison to control group.

Conclusions:

The introduced D-NAM/3D-printed appliance is a simple and efficient technique to improve the MADs in infants with UCLP before surgical lip repair.

Keywords

cleft lip and palate nasoalveolar molding computer-aided design 3D-printing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breitsprecher

Fanghänel

Metelmann

Mlynski

Würfel

Freise

Knape

. The influence of the muscles of facial expression on the development of the midface and the nose in cleft lip and palate patients. A reflection of functional anatomy, facial esthetics and physiology of the nose. Ann Anat. 1999;181(1):19–25.

Brophy

. Bone surgery essential in the treatment of complete cleft palate. J Am Dent Assoc. 1923;10(2):3–18.

Campbell

Restrepo

Park

Navas

Deshpande

Swanson

Bjorn

Lisa

Ayala

. Influence of severity on aesthetic outcomes of unilateral cleft lip repair in 1,823 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(1):e2083.

Chang

Wallace

Chien-Jung Pai

Chiu

Hsieh

Chen

Yu-Fang

Jen-Wein

Kuo-Ting Chen

. Comparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized prospective single-blinded trial to compare nasal outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(2):275–282.

Figueroa

Polley

. Orthodontics in cleft lip and palate management. In: Mathes

, ed. Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2006:271–310.

Friede

Lilja

. Dentofacial morphology in adolescent or early adult patients with cleft lip and palate after a treatment regiment that included vomer flap surgery and pushback palatal repair. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1994;28(2):113–121.

Gkantidis

Papamanou

Karamolegkou

Dorotheou

. Esthetic, functional, and everyday life assessment of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–8.

Gomez

Donohue

Figueroa

Polley

. Nasal changes after presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) in the unilateral cleft lip nose. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(6):689–700.

Gong

. Correction of maxillary deformity in infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate using computer-assisted design. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(5 suppl):S74–S78.

10.

Grayson

Cutting

Wood

. Preoperative columella lengthening in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(7):1422–1423.

11.

Hocevar-Boltezar

Jarc

Kozelj

. Ear, nose and voice problems in children with orofacial clefts. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(4):276–281.

12.

Hoffman

. De Labios leporinos, von Hasenscharte. Bergmann; 1686.

13.

Latham

Kusy

Georgiade

. An extraorally activated expansion appliance for cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate J. 1976;13:253–261.

14.

Lisson

Schilke

Tränkmann

. Transverse changes after surgical closure of complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Clin Oral Invest. 1999;3(2):18–24.

15.

Loeffelbein

Ritschl

Rau

Wolff

Barbarino

Pfeifer

Schönberger

Wintermantel

. Analysis of computer-aided techniques for virtual planning in nasoalveolar moulding. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(5):455–460.

16.

Matsuo

Hirose

Tomono

Iwasawa

Katohda

Takahashi

Koh

. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(1):38–50.

17.

McNeil

. Congenital oral deformities. Br Dent J. 1956;101(2):191–198.

18.

Moher

Hopewell

Schulz

Montori

Gøtzsche

Devereaux

Elbourne

Egger

Altman

. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340(1):c869.

19.

Mossey

Modell

. Epidemiology of oral clefts 2012: an international perspective. Front Oral Biol. 2012;16(2):1–18.

20.

Rau

Ritschl

Mücke

Wolff

Loeffelbein

. Nasoalveolar molding in cleft care—Experience in 40 patients from a single centre in Germany. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118103.

21.

Ritschl

Rau

Guell

DiBora

Wolff

Schoenberger

Franz

Erich

Loeffelbein

. Pitfalls and solutions in virtual design of nasoalveolar molding plates by using CAD/CAM technology-a preliminary clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(4):453–459.

22.

Ross

Mac Namera

. Effect of presurgical infant orthopedics on facial esthetics in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994;31(2):68–73.

23.

Rousseau

Metzger

Frucht

Schupp

Hempel

Otten

. Effect of lip closure on early maxillary growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg, 2013;15(5):369–373.

24.

Schimming

Hunter

Mason

Milas

Bressmann

Sader

Horch

. Quality of life research in patients with cleft lip and palate: preliminary results. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1999;3(3):134–139.

25.

Shen

Yao

Magee

Chai

Zhang

. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding for cleft lip and palate: the application of digitally designed molds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1007e–1015e.

26.

van der Plas

Koscik

Conrad

Moser

Nopoulos

. Social motivation in individuals with isolated cleft lip and palate. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(5):489–500.

27.

Gong

Shen

. CAD presurgical nasoalveolar molding effects on the maxillary morphology in infants with UCLP. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(4):418–426.

28.

Gong

Wang

Qian

Shen

. A novel technique for presurgical nasoalveolar molding using computer-aided reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(1):142–146.

29.

Zhu

Chen

. Association between gingival recession and proclination of maxillary central incisors near the cleft in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective case-control study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(3):364–370.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB